/1 We sent a FOIA to the National Archives for records related to Obama Foundation’s possession of presidential records & an apparent $3.3M dollar transfer from the Obama Foundation to NARA to move the records from the Foundation’s private facility to a NARA-controlled facility.
/2 On September 21, 2018, more than a year after former President Barack Obama left the White House, NARA and the Obama Foundation entered into a Letter of Intent (LOI) to allow the Obama Foundation to maintain possession of presidential records for the purpose of digitizing them… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
/3 According to the LOI, the Obama Foundation had kept presidential records—including classified records—at a private facility in Hoffman Estates, IL, but NARA would eventually move the records to NARA-controlled facilities, “that conform with the agency’s archival storage… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
/4 On February 15, 2019, NARA and the Obama Foundation entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) further detailing their roles and responsibilities to complete the Digitization Project.
/5 However, it’s unclear whether the Obama Foundation’s private facility had also conformed with NARA’s “archival storage standards.”
Instead, it’s likely that the Obama Foundation had illegally stored classified Presidential records in its private facility in Hoffman Estates,… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
/6 Furthermore, the Obama Foundation provided NARA with $3,300,000 as part of this deal. For one, the Antideficiency Act prohibits federal agencies from expending federal funds in advance or in excess of an appropriation.
/1🚨BREAKING: AFL SUES MARICOPA COUNTY TO STOP ILLEGAL ELECTION POWER GRAB🚨
Maricopa County is trying to unlawfully seize control of election operations in Arizona.
AFL just filed a lawsuit to stop this illegal election interference.
🧵👇
/2 AFL filed the lawsuit against the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors on behalf of Maricopa County Recorder Justin Heap.
The board is attempting to unlawfully seize control of election operations by refusing to give Recorder Heap the resources he needs to fulfill his statutory duty to administer elections.
/3 Arizona law requires the board to fully fund the recorder’s necessary expenses.
Despite this, the board recently passed a budget that permanently transfers the recorder’s key statutory duties to itself and underfunds the recorder’s office.
/1🚨BREAKING — AFL just sent a letter to DOJ exposing how the University of Virginia is disguising its discriminatory DEI infrastructure under a new lexicon of euphemisms to evade federal law.
The law is clear — and UVA is on notice.
DOJ is watching — and so are we.
🧵THREAD:
/2 On April 28, DOJ formally directed UVA to certify — “with precision and particularity” — that it had dismantled its discriminatory DEI programs to comply with federal civil rights law and President Trump’s Executive Orders.
UVA didn’t comply.
Instead, it formed a working group to “promote open inquiry” and build a “truly inclusive and welcoming community.”
/3 UVA has rebranded its discriminatory policies under new labels, using euphemisms like “Inclusive Excellence,” “Community Engagement,” and “Viewpoint Diversity.”
The names changed — but the substance didn’t.
“Inclusive Excellence” is the framework universities now use to disguise DEI — embedding unlawful preferences based on race, sex, national origin, and other protected traits into operations under the illusion of equity and belonging.
/1🚨BREAKING — AFL just moved to intervene in a major lawsuit to overturn an unlawful, decades-old, and race-based consent decree — and restore merit-based hiring in the federal government.
/2 For 44 years, a race-based consent decree has prohibited the federal government from using a standardized, merit-based exam to hire civil servants.
This is unconstitutional — and it must be overturned.
/3 In 1981, during the final days of the Carter Administration, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) entered into the Luevano consent decree, ending the use of a standardized written aptitude test in federal hiring.
Since then, OPM has failed to identify any test that satisfies the decree’s race-based requirements.
🔥 Unelected judges with apparent political agendas are blocking President Trump’s policies with “nationwide injunctions.”
These activist judges are abusing the judicial power and usurping the will of the people to sabotage the President’s America First mandate.
Here’s how 🧵
President Trump faced over 64 injunctions in his first term — more than any president in history.
Now, it’s happening again.
This isn’t a normal judicial process — it’s a full-scale judicial power grab to thwart the results of a valid election.
Less than 4 months into the second Trump Administration, the judiciary has already issued over 200 orders to halt the President’s agenda — including nearly 40 nationwide injunctions.
/3 Judge McConnell is presiding over New York v. Trump, a lawsuit brought by 21 states and D.C. challenging President Trump’s temporary freeze on federal funding.
In February, he ordered taxpayer money to continue flowing to the states, including to Crossroads Rhode Island, where he served as a board member and board chairman over a span of nearly 20 years.