#2 Masks did work during the pandemic, but not in the way they were communicated. They were used as a social conditioning tool to remind everybody of an alleged deadly pandemic. They were a daily reminder of an invisible enemy that turned out to be much less deadly than claimed.
#3 Already during the Spanish flu, it was claimed that masks would reduce transmission by 99%. However, studies suggest that wearing them for a long time caused bacterial pneumonia back in 1918 (bit.ly/42bRlOU).
#4 This raises a question that could stump even Sherlock Holmes himself: If masks were once considered as effective as a sieve in a submarine, why the sudden flip? Does the truth lie in the past, or are we just playing a global game of hide and seek?
#5 The logic of transmission prevention was extremely random and of political nature. Does the virus have the ability to differentiate between BLM supporters or MAGA supporters? Or can it tell if you're sitting in a restaurant versus walking to the restaurant bathroom?
#6 Even the @WHO was initially against masks until May 2020. Suddenly, they changed their stance without proper scientific research.
@WHO #7 In a world where masks were deemed as effective as a chocolate kettle, 2020 arrived with a plot twist. Despite a historical consensus branding masks as futile, experts abruptly changed their tune. One wonders, what sparked this dramatic shift?
@WHO #8 The mask revolution wasn't confined to a single region. It spanned continents. Notably, Pfizer's Brazilian protege @oatila, who once scorned masks, did a full 180 in time to march in step with Pfizer's grand parade.
@WHO@oatila #9 But wait, there's more. What's with the sudden hush from the usually chatty scientific world? Why are they going along with measures that don't make much sense? It's like someone hit the mute button on all our outspoken experts.
@WHO@oatila #10 The puppet masters of this silence? The Global Players. Consider German virologist @c_drosten, who was responsible for the fraudulent Covid PCR test. His statement was simple: Doubt all who dare question the official narrative.
@WHO@oatila@c_drosten #11 And then there are health officials like Theresa Tam (@CPHO_Canada), pushing boundaries to new levels. Preaching masks even during the most intimate moments and endorsing glory holes as the pandemic-proof solution to carnal desires.
🧵THREAD: In 2015, the Nobel Prize in Medicine was awarded to William C. Campbell and Satoshi Ōmura for their discovery of Ivermectin. This broad-spectrum anti-parasitic drug has been extensively used to treat infections caused by numerous parasites.
#2 In fact, among all treatments, IVM has been demonstrated to be the most effective, showing a 63% improvement. In contrast, the potentially harmful Remdesivir, which costs $3,200 and is thus 3,200 times more expensive than IVM, has been promoted by Fauci and his colleagues.
#3 Ivermectin's low cost is just one reason for its vilification. The risk of people being healthier during a pandemic than before was likely decisive. Who'd get vaccinated if ivermectin eased fears? Hence, a media smear campaign was required. (h/t @Plandemic3Movie)
A man named @MattGertz from Media Matters (@mmfa) just shared this leaked video attempting to discredit Tucker Carlson and portray him negatively. However, the posted clip seems to have the opposite effect, making him appear even more sympathetic.
Hey @MattGertz - if media truly mattered, as you seem to suggest, why aren't you outraged that @CNN has admitted to manipulating public opinion regarding Covid and climate issues?
By the way, meet @AlyssaRosenberg, the wife of @MattGertz, who's attempting to slander @TuckerCarlson. Why am I not surprised that people who view Tucker as a threat to the media share and spread such a twisted and alarming mindset!?
Hey @AlastairMcA30, two years ago you claimed that the experimental gene therapy was 100% effective and had no side effects. Have you already apologized to the millions of surviving victims, or are you just ignoring the consequences of your words?
You won't be able to avoid this forever, @AlastairMcA30. Eventually, your past statements will catch up with you – like this one where you mockingly dismissed vaccine injuries as "unimportant nonsense."
Even with your claim about herd immunity through vaccination, you were completely off the mark, just like almost everything you've said over the past 3 years. Instead of showing remorse, you continue to attack those who have ultimately been proven right. Why is that, Alastair?
Hey @latimes, it seems to me as if @hiltzikm has disqualified himself from writing for you with all his authoritarian and fascist statements. What do you think?
This is not the first time that @hiltzikm has let his fascist fantasies run free. A year ago, he already said that critical people should be despised and mocked. You also published this misanthropic statement.
And what do fascists do when they are exposed as fascists? Exactly - they block. Both @hiltzikm and you belong on the pyre of history. You are part of the problem and not part of the solution. Shame!
🧵THREAD: In an age of alleged pandemic urgency, supposed good intentions have led to discrimination against the unvaccinated and coercion for gene therapies. This thread unveils the bad guys' deeds that must not be allowed to fall into oblivion.
A special note of disapproval.⬇️
#1 Thank you to all the citizen journalists for calling out the nefarious activities of the government and stopping the Mary Poppins-singing censor czar @wiczipedia from scheming to infringe upon the people's right to free speech.
#2 Thank you, @BillGates, for finally admitting that your vaccines don’t stop transmission and don’t stop infection. Now, please stop buying up farmland and injecting our food with mRNA.