Something I have been mulling for a while that I was too cowardly to face directly until this week is just how often riding transit predictably makes me feel bad about myself. If I respond, I'll feel bad. If I don't, I'll feel bad.
If you can just bow your head in silence while a crazy guy threatens you and everyone around you and then walk off that train completely unaffected, unmoved, and unbothered, then I'm very happy for you.
I cannot. It will ruin my day. I will think about it a lot.
I find it dehumanizing and emasculating. It makes me feel like a sad coward. But there's also no upside to engaging.
So you really cannot win.
I have a lot of my personality wrapped up in preferring cities, in an attraction to transit, in urbanism, generally, which is why this is a difficult thing for me to admit to myself.
And, man, I cannot get over the cacophony of voices this week insisting that if I want to live in a city, then I better get used to it, because that's just how it is.
"Go back to the suburbs, pussy."
Ok, then, I guess. Your terms are acceptable.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When conservatives talk about "reducing crime" they mean overall, a statistical measure at the population level. Progressives mean "deterring" every individual crime. That's why they say incarceration doesn't work. In their head locking someone up means you didn't stop the crime.
This might sound silly, but I've actually had this stated to me directly in the form of, "Incarceration can't work in principle because the crime was already committed!"
The most obvious way to square this circle (and the one progressives hate, because it implies that some people might actually just be more violent than others) is that crime isn't evenly distributed in the population. It's the same individuals doing all the crimes over and over.
I don't know about the claim that people "get more conservative" as they get older. What I'm finding is that I'm just less tolerant of disorder for the same reason a guy flicking your nose for 5 seconds is a minor annoyance but if he does it for 30 years it's torture.
I haven't really changed my mind about welfare or universal health care or whatever. I just don't want to be around disorder. I've had lots of years of saying it's not so bad and now I just kind of want the guy to stop flicking my nose.
There's something just so casually funny about a 25 year old who has been enduring the nose-flicks for 10 minutes insisting that it's no big deal and they're just better people than those lame intolerant old guys who have been getting flicked in the face for 30 years.
This is an embarrassingly shallow thread generated entirely out of motivated reasoning. Intellectual honesty is a fucking superpower. You can be a nobody and literally be smarter than a stats PhD at Harvard if you're capable of looking at a chart and describing it plainly.
I don't have any kind of prurient interest in racial crime data, but on the other hand just flat-out lying about it shouldn't be tolerated in academic or intellectual circles.
*sees chart*
"I bet the data are wrong and anyway I'm sure everybody lying about it has a good faith reason. I am a stats PhD candidate, by the way. Isn't statistics neat!"
Just an embarrassingly naive and cringe worldview, but part of becoming a fully realized adult is accepting that this is what intellectually topping out looks like for something like 75% of the population
I hate to break it to you, but nobody thinks about you *at all* until they notice something about your behavior. Nobody cares about you. At all. Until they notice you. Unless you're noticeable. So you should think about the ways in which you're noticeable.
Nobody wants to keep you down. Nobody cares if you win or lose. Nobody cares about you at all. Maybe your mother does. But that's about it. Nobody else cares.
“What are you talking about! We need to stop this!”
The water’s up to your neck.
“That tells us nothing about the leak’s cause” the voice replies.
“Do it now!” you cry.
“Root causes…” the voice tries to say, but it’s too late. Water fills your throat. The voice goes silent.
Root causes are interesting as an
abstract sociological matter and we should care about them, because we all have an interest in preventing the creation of future criminals. But they are largely uninteresting with respect to the existence of a criminal that already exists.
Of my 5 best friends in St. Louis two have been robbed at gunpoint.
A good friend in my second tier of friends was shot 5 times because his roommate brought home the wrong guys from the bar after closing (he's doing fine!)
In my broader group of acquaintances one homicide.
Maybe crime seems sort of abstract to you? I don't know. It doesn't to me.
Obviously, it's a given that every single person in that group has been threatened or had their car broken into or whatever. I'm just talking about the serious violent crimes that have touched a small group of normal people.