Despite our original proposals, it's only right that our railways, water, mail and energy are kept in private hands. Profit margins are increasing massively for shareholders, and should go higher.
Education is not really a human right, so we believe that students should to take on a mountain of debt to learn. Discouraging working class people from higher education is not a problem.
Migrants are a bit like animals. They should be constantly tracked, even if this causes physical and mental strain on their health. But it's okay because migrants are not really human under a Labour government!
We can't trust trans children to know who they are. A Labour government will ensure that parents guide trans children to their standards. Autonomy for trans children is too much!
Labour know there are inclusive churches in the UK, but it's really important to win over pro-conversion therapy votes - no matter how many times we apologise for it.
We know that increasing the work force would help tackle the cost-of-living crisis, but frankly Britain is for the British. We need to limit opportunities, besides Brexit has worked really well.
Look, Labour represents the workers. Not unions, who are elected by the workers. We'll be sure not to listen to silly union reps who are not engaged with workers at all.
10) Not increase wages by inflation We know we said we'd listen to workers and not unions. But now that we did, workers are asking for too much. Sorry, a Labour government will offer a real terms cut.
Okay, we did say we would support workers. After all we are called the LABOUR party. But after thinking about it, Labour won't join workers on picket lines. Frankly that's for peasants.
We hear you. We listened ...to shareholders. It's important to continue privatising the NHS, because we've seen huge successes for profits in the US model. Health care is a human right, but do bring along your bank card. thetimes.co.uk/article/sir-ke…
13) Thatcher inspired policies on crime Yeah, we're literally just copying and pasting Tory policy now. Not even trying. But why solve social and economic conditions to reduce crime, when you can just jail the poor and encourage more crime?
We know that the Scottish parliament voted by 2/3 to support rights for trans people. And we know the Conservatives blocking trans rights and democracy is bad.
We know we can work with centre-left/left wing parties such as the Greens or SNP at the local level. But our new Labour is different. We're proud to be in coalition with Conservatives across the country!
Britain's future comes first. That's why we're proud to be backed by Scottish Conservative leader @Douglas4Moray if it means stopping other left leaning parties like the SNP and Greens.
We know there's a deep history for civil rights across the world, and we know "defund the police" just means we should invest in mental health and tackling poverty.
But instead I'll ignore this context because, uh, politics?
We could stand up for immigrants in the UK. But that's too much effort, so a progressive Labour government will largely copy UKIP's immigration policy.
You think all the above is bad? Then please remember that Starmer enabled abuse towards Apsana Begum, a victim of domestic abuse, and *ignored every single call* to support her.
Starmer and Labour sent condolences to many victims of tragedies beginning of 2023. Yet they didn't say a single word of empathy about the murder of a young trans girl.
The UK has one of the most undemocratic voting systems in the Western world. Despite leading democracies having forms of proportional representation, Labour will fix the problem by *checks notes* keeping the current system. thenational.scot/news/23486672.…
27) Who cares about Kashmir?
Despite the UN calling for Kashmir to have a free and democratic referendum to decide its future, again democracy is overrated.
That's why Labour won't show solidarity for Kashmiris. Besides, what's wrong with occupation?
Oh, we're sorry, did we pretend to be progressive to win over Labour member's votes and then just completely scrap our pledges? Well tough, we're in charge now and we can break as many pledges as we want.
PLEASE just forget that Keir Starmer did not vote against abolishing legally binding child poverty targets, cuts to child tax credits, cuts to Employment and Support Allowance, and cuts to housing benefit for young people. independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
32) Similar immigration policies
But wait, didn't we already go over this one?
We did, except this time Keir Starmer is literally admitting it. Like, just straight up saying it.
Starmer supporters in the replies are desperately trying to twist what Labour's policies are. So, to take them seriously for a moment, let's respond to a few of their points.
But briefly to Starmer supporters...
"Labour want a minimum wage of £10 an hour like Corbyn!"
The new living wage is £11.95 an hour in London and £10.90 elsewhere. Whoopsies!
No, they don't. Rather than nationalise big energy companies now, they want to focus on "the management of the investments, which we believe are essential to unlock these markets and opportunities".
This is a lie. When countries wish to join the EU, they need to meet the criteria set out in the chapters of the acquis. There is no specific deficit requirement within these chapters. A short 🧵
Croatia joined the EU in 2013, consistently running government deficits above 3%/GDP, including the year it joined. Cyprus joined the EU in 2004, a deficit to GDP of 3.7%, and the year prior at 5.9%. Hungary (2004) consistently ran a deficit above 3% to GDP between 2001 to 2011.
The 3% deficit to GDP rule that Alex Cole-Hamilton is referring to are Stability Programmes that are intended for EU member states that adopt the Euro, who specifically need to follow the Fiscal Compact.
Many people, rightly so, pointing out @agcolehamilton misogynistic undertones with this tweet. Of course this would not be the first time he's done this.
There was the time @agcolehamilton told @MareeToddMSP to "f*ck off" simply because he didn't like the answer he received, and then went on to partly blame Maree for his own language.
Made sneering comments about Nicola Sturgeon’s record on young carers because she did not have kids for herself. Judging women by their experiences with children is draconian, but it is made even more awful when he ignores Sturgeon’s previous miscarriage. holyrood.com/news/view,char…