Fascism and ethno-nationalism have always been international ideologies.
Nazism itself was partly influenced by the work of American white supremacists, eugenicists and official racist immigration policies.
Alfred Rosenberg, the influential Nazi ideologue re: race, found the term "Untermensch" in the German translation of Lothrop Stoddard's work. Stoddard was a Harvard academic and Klansman.
His racist screed ‘The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy’ (1920) of course included Spain and parts of Central and South America in its “White World.”
When Stoddard visited Nazi Germany in 1939-'40 he personally spoke with Himmler and Hitler. He attended a Nazi eugenics court and while he approved in general he felt that they were "too conservative" in their judgements.
According to a colleague based in Germany since 1934, Stoddard was afforded special treatment by the Third Reich because his writings on racism "were featured in Nazi school textbooks."
See The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism & German National Socialism by Stefan Kühl
And where did thousands of Nazi war criminals find refuge after the war? They fled via Spain to Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Brazil and many other Latin American nations. These clippings of Nazis in Colombia are from a Life magazine report in 1950.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
That he is buying into obviously manipulated and distorted statistics, a technique used by racists for *decades* to increase racist sentiment, suggests that Musk is au fait with far-right propaganda, agrees w/ it & has likely lurked on 4chan or an equivalent for quite some time.
Virginia (1705): "If any slave resist his master...shall happen to be killed in such correction, it shall not be accounted felony but the [person] so giving correction shall be free and acquit of all punishment and accusation for the same, as if such incident had never happened."
North Carolina (1715): “Any person or persons [may] kill any Runaway Slave that hath lyen out two months...such persons shall not be called to answer for same if he give Oath that he could not apprehend such Slave but was constrained to kill him."
Jamaica (1686): “Every man killing a [rebellious] negro to have £20, or, if a servant, his freedom…every man taking a negro to have £40; any party killing a negro to divide £20 round."
The latest far-right conspiracy theorist to push the “Irish slaves” line is the Musk-promoted racist and anti-semitic extremist E. Michael Jones. Jones has previously described the Civil Rights Movement to end racial segregation as a “Jewish war on the South.”
He has over 47k followers and being Musk-ticked, his anti-semitic output is promoted and prioritised by the Twitter algorithm. No surprise that he also promotes Gemma O’Doherty’s brand of ethno-nationalist ‘great replacement’ hate literature.
It took years for any semblance of meaningful and consistent moderation to exist on this platform. It was in essence a libertarian website that had to be dragged kicking towards reform. We all invested so much effort for it to be useful and bearable.
It really is amazing how reactionary and shallow Elon Musk truly is. When asked to explain a nonsensical phrase he used online he states that “[it means] you can’t question anything” and then provides a vague and purely anecdotal ‘cancel culture’ tale about George Washington.
The mumbled George Washington example is an intentional inversion of the actual reality and history of how his slave ownership was not sufficiently acknowledged by the nationalist narratives/myth making at public history sites, memorials and by the U.S. education system.
It is only over the last decade that Washington’s important connection to slavery has been taken more fully into account.
As historian Eric Foner relates “What tourists find [at Mount Vernon] has changed dramatically in recent years. Slavery used to be pretty much ignored…”
George Berkeley: "It would be of advantage to the [slave masters]" to convert their slaves to Christianity as "Gospel Liberty [is consistent] with temporal Servitude; and [their] Slaves would only become better Slaves by being Christians." (1725)
Great working paper here on Berkeley’s Legacies at Trinity by @amhuss27, Ciaran O’Neill and @SpeakerConolly. I’m particularly stunned by the tired moral relativist arguments by some of those who wish to retain the name. tcd.ie/seniordean/leg…
Canny appeals to “the moral standards of his own time where there was nothing reprehensible about owning slaves…”
Context: British taxpayers subsidised British slave trading companies, slave forts, slave plantations and paid £20 million in reparations to *slaveowners* in 1834.
Daniel O'Connell MP: "If money is to be given, give it to the wretched slaves; but do not give it to the men who hold a lash over the backs of their fellow creatures. I protest against remuneration to the planters in principle - I protest against it in practice."
This event, where the elite essentially paid themselves from the exchequer, contrasts with the then-ongoing reform of the British Poor Laws, which reduced public expenditure on the poor and established the punitive workhouse system as a “deterrent to idleness”.