1/ Quick thread on the Russian May 9 Victory parade - quick because it was, in fact, over very quickly - the official video is less than 1.5 hours (1 hour 24 mins to be exact), compared to much longer parades of the past.
2/ Very few vehicles on display - just one T-34-85 tank leading the armored column, instead of several as in past parades. No other tanks at all, not even a single T-72. Several armored vehicles - Tigers, Kamaz, BTR-90, Boomerangs, plus Iskander, S-400 and Yars rockets.
3/ No aircraft flyover, usually one of the more interesting parts such parades. This time, the obvious empty spaces was filled with the military marching bands singing the song titled "Victory." (Btw, it was a BTR-82A and not the BTR-90 APC, correcting the previous post)
4/ President Putin spoke in person, and his speech did not offer any surprises, stating that victory will be Russia's against a global threat to his country. The short parade and the obvious absence of so many vehicles and systems indicated a nation under stress...
5/...that almost rushed through one of its key holiday celebrations. Other Victory parades across Russia were also greatly curtailed, and some cancelled altogether. Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Armenia and Uzbekistan leaders were present...
6/...displaying political and historical solidarity even as tensions simmer between Russia and some of these nations. This is usually one of the most-televised events in Russia, and tens of millions watching probably also noticed a very thinned parade lineup.
7/ A parade in Ulan-Ude in Buryat Region featured few vehicles as well - a few WW2 vehicles, lots of military trucks and some older armored cars, plus an Iskander unit. Buryat Region sent many of its fighters to Ukraine.
8/ Probably the more interesting parade was held in Verhnaya Pishma in Sverdlovsk Region - this annual historical parade featured only WW2 vehicles. Even here, there are major space gaps between each passing vehicle.
9/ Other useful threads about this parade, with data about previous parade lineups for comparison.
10/ In contrast with Moscow, the parade in Kaliningrad featured a T-72BM tank, along with Pantsir-S1 air defense system, Bal and Bastion anti-ship missile batteries, and a Grad MLRS.
11/ The parade in Perm featured MSTA and Nona self-propelled howitzers, and 2S31 Vena amphibious self-propelled mortar system, which were absent in Moscow. According to official Russian media, "some of these systems went directly to Ukraine after the parade."
12/ The parade in Novgorod featured lots of historical WW2 vehicles and systems, including GAZ-67 - a mass-produced Soviet "Jeep" equivalent.
13/ The parade in St. Petersburg also lacked an air show, and had a similar vehicle and systems line up as in Moscow: T-34 tank, Tiger vehicle, Iskander and Bastion missiles, and a S-400 system.
14/ The parade in Samara featured a mix of WW2 and modern systems, as did a parade in Tula. The parade in Volgograd featured a T-90 tank, along with WW2 vehicles.
15/ The airspace over Moscow was closely guarded, with many police and law enforcement personnel fielding CUAS rifles such as the one in the photo.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ From Russia's Rybar, one of the top pro-Kremlin Telegram channels, on the possibility of delivering Geran drones to Venezuela as a deterrent against US: "How will the situation change if Russian Geran UAVs are delivered to Venezuela?" t.me/rybar/73048
2/ "Let's imagine that, say, 2,000 Gerans are delivered to the Bolivarian Republic. Then the Venezuelans will be able to reach American bases in the Caribbean region, and under certain conditions, even facilities on the US mainland. What can the Gerans hit when launched from Caracas?"
3/ "The Guantanamo Naval Base in Cuba, which can accommodate about 50 ships of different classes and about 5,000 servicemen. It was from there that one of the littoral ships LCS-21, which is now circling near the coast of Venezuela, has departed."
1/ QUICK TAKE: For a long time, many Rus commentators and bloggers decried the lack of enough SIGNIT (radio electronic reconnaissance, or RER in Rus) at the front to identify and go after Ukr drones. In a translated post from a Ukr commentator Serg Marco, Rus bloggers note the following. t.me/RVvoenkor/97984
2/ Serg Marco explained some of the reasons for the Ukrainian military's difficult situation in the Pokrovsky direction. According to Marco, the problems began at the end of spring 2025, when the greenery bloomed, and the Russian army had the opportunity to actively use...
3/ ...mobile groups and equipment under the cover of foliage, which greatly complicated the defense, and the Ukrainian forces simply did not have the means to stop all Russian soldiers marching under the cover of treetops.
1/ QUICK TAKE by a Rus mil commentator on the importance of going after Ukrainian small tactical radars: "Why is it important to knock them out first? Many have wondered why there are fewer videos of strikes on airfields and air defense systems in the enemy rear?" t.me/rybar/72883
2/ "The answer is simple - since last year, the Ukrainian forces have been actively shooting down our recon fixed-wing drones with their interceptor UAVs, and it is no longer possible to fly there freely."
3/ "The enemy manages to effectively ensure interception of our UAVs by using air target detection stations. It would seem that this is a priority target for destruction, but for some reason there is still no systematic fight against them."
1/ THREAD: Rus TG channels on flying and operating drones in bad weather - when there is rain, snow, fog, wind and frost: "Key battlefield scenarios for using UAVs are collecting information and physical destruction of targets. For both, we depend on the viewing range..." t.me/Notes_of_the_J…
2/ "...for which the camera is responsible. Also, recon drones and FPVs have electronics that require moisture protection and power elements, the energy of which is spent not only on movement, but also on stabilizing the drone in flight. We will therefore consider..."
3/ "...how different weather factors will affect the drone components, and therefore, what restrictions on use will be imposed. Precipitation: rain and snow are water in the atmosphere, in a liquid or solid state. The size of the droplets varies from 0.5 to 5 mm."
1/ Russia's Rubicon Center, where most experienced drone operators are using radio-controlled and fiber-optic UAVs with devastating success, is officially a year old. A few observations from TG: "Rubicon's main achievement is not a quantitative or technical improvement, but an organizational one." t.me/VictoryDrones/…
2/ "Previously, a Russian UAV operator was simultaneously an operator, an engineer, a sapper, and a reconnaissance officer (while being some kind of grenade launcher according to the documents), but in Rubicon all these functions are separated."
3/ "The drone operator basically only controls the drone that is being prepared for him. Reconnaissance is separate, and the engineer is separate. Vertical connections are built in parallel, the video also directly mentions that reconnaissance and destruction work..."
1/ THREAD: What do Russia-based military experts think of the impact of drone warfare in Ukraine? In an analysis translated below, Director of Moscow-based CAST (Center for Analysis of Strategies and Tech) sounds off on the key battlefield changes. rg.ru/2025/07/09/dro…
2/ "It is obvious that as the element base becomes miniaturized and cheaper, combat operations will increasingly take the form of actions by incredible hordes of drones of the most diverse types, shapes, sizes and purposes (but mostly smaller and cheaper)..."
3/ "...and at the same time increasingly long-range and autonomous, which will become the main means of war, since they allow combining reconnaissance and strike capabilities. The battlefield and the rear for tens of kilometers will become a total "kill zone", in which drones will destroy everything."