1. According to emails I'm releasing, Congress will correct the record on CDC Director Walensky's false statement about masks.
(Plus, I've uncovered conflicts of interest at Cochrane)
2. During a hearing before Congress, CDC Director Walensky made the false claim that a Cochrane review on masks had been "retracted." Social media influencer Zeynep Tufekci made an earlier false claim the review had been "corrected."
Fact check false!
3. Cochrane authors cannot force the NY Times to correct Tufekci's misleading claims and false statements, but Congress is correcting the CDC Director's false statement.
Here's the congressional staffer email thanking Cochrane for bringing this to the attention of Congress.
4. I also uncovered undisclosed COI regarding a Cochrane board member who helped author the statement undermining Cochrane's review of masks.
Catherine Marshall failed to disclose her COVID consulting gigs w/ New Zealand which instituted mask mandates.
5. Cochrane will not respond to questions about whether Marshall advised New Zealand to enforce mask mandates when Cochrane found little evidence they work.
It's becoming clear that Cochrane members use Cochrane to get consulting gigs.
6. Also, the congressional staffer said she's a big fan of @VPrasadMDMPH podcast and this is how she knew that the CDC Director was giving a false statement during the hearing.
To see more and read all the documents at @DisInfoChron:
1. NY Governor @KathyHochul is now promoting "off label" prescribing for COVID vax. Even though the vast majority of doctors in NY don't get the boosters, and don't get COVID jab for their own kids.
NY DOCTOR: "I have never worked in healthcare like this."
1) I'm on vacay and have gotten several calls from Hill staff and Trump officials about this @emilyakopp "exclusive" that repeats old stories--some OTHERS broke.
One IC official told me, "There's nothing new. This is just sleazy."
Emily has done this numerous times before; let's review
@Dylan_Housman
@_EricLieberman_
@VinceCoglianese
@JohnCFLoftus1
@DailyCaller
@SenJoniErnst
@tuckercarlson
@robbysoave
@RisingTheHill
@CarlHigbie
@lizlyons47
@ianmSC
@paulsperry_
#KOPPyKAT
2) EXAMPLE 1
Emily Kopp "exclusive" first reported by @SharriMarkson
#KOPPyKAT
3) EXAMPLE 1
Sharri Markson broke this story a few months back in 2021.
1) NIH Director released new priorities for national research. I was leaked a copy of document. Follow along.
"To rebuild public trust, NIH is enhancing oversight of funded research abroad and reinforcing its commitment to responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars."
2) DEI and affirmative action are out and replication in research is in.
3) A strategic plan on AI is coming.
Lots more nutrition research, it appears, with focus on long term studies to ID good and bad diets, starting before birth.
Max Koslov and the #sciomm writers at @Nature continue putting out fake news and propaganda. Koslov's publisher Springer Nature won't say if they got a DOJ letter from @EagleEdMartin, but I published that letter to Springer Nature a month ago.
Koslov just can't do journalism.
2) Here's the letter DOJ sent to Springer Nature's journal Nature Medicine, which published the corrupt "Proximal Origin" paper.
1) Trump administration has pivoted to investigate the much ballyhooed "Proximal Origin" paper by @scrippsresearch Kristian Andersen.
Read DOJ's letter to @NatureMedicine. Trump officials believe the paper was a quid pro quo for a Fauci grant. tinyurl.com/ykr7vxpv
2) Suspicions have long dogged this study, as emails have found the authors ran it past funders Tony Fauci and Francis Collins at the NIH, as well as @JeremyFarrar when he was at the Wellcome Trust.
In one email, Kristian Andersen praised them for "advice and leadership."
3) When Nature Medicine published the paper, editor in chief Joaa Monteiro claimed the paper “put conspiracy theories” about the pandemic’s possible lab origin to rest.
Is labelling an alternative hypothesis a "conspiracy theory" normal in science?