On Ireland's #Eurovision2023
there was a song called "Midnight Summer Night" by Connolly which was leading after the industry vote, and with some stagecraft would have made it to the final, but the Late Late Show viewers went for sub-Coldplay dirge. 1/
That song was far more in line with the tastes of people who actually watch and vote on the Eurovision.
I remember watching the Irish Eurosong final, and when the public vote came in and Connolly didn't win my immediate reaction was...2/
Our song was exactly the sort of song someone would cynically write to try to win Eurovision, rather than writing something that had some soul. You may not like the Connolly song, but at least it isn't a soulless, failed attempt to write an anthem. 3/
We've gone from being Eurovision legends to being a Eurovision laughing stock, and when Dustin the Turkey (our Eurovision low points) showed up last night for a "comedy" bit, I was thinking that that is an apt representation of our track record in the last ten years. A joke. 4/
Having a public vote is right, but having it as part of a Late Late Show special isn't.
There should be a show on RTE 2 where people who would watch and vote on Eurovision have to make a special effort to watch and vote on it. 5/
As a songwriter, why would you enter a soulful bop which might do well at Eurovision if it can't get past the hurdle of also appealing to an aging RTE Friday Night audience, who would plump for out-of-date dirge if given the option? 6/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A new "trans person who agrees with us" account, and it's taken her just 21 days to do a "I can't believe the leopards are eating my face too" tweet. There's no mystery here, @kelly_cadigan. They're transphobes, you're a prop, and they'll never respect you as a trans woman.
What's hilarious is that she says "some conservatives, not all use "trans identifed male"" to describe trans women, which she finds disrespectful, as if it is something new, when "TIM" has been standard "gender critical" lexicon for YEARS.
If you're a trans person thinking of doing a Right Wing grift, first you don't just need to detransition, you need to renounce being transgender as if it were akin to worshipping Satan. Then you need to put out a book called something like "Gender Madness." Even then...
Any time "Arty Morty" tweets about trans kids, remember this: he's just a transphobic barman who calls the anti-trans movement his "better friends," even though they once held a Twitter space debating about whether he was a nonce or not, because he's gay, and they're homophobes.
"Arty" (not his real name) genuinely thinks that trans kids were invented around 2020, because he's an ignoramus.
Trans kids are not a "premise," they simply exist, they've always existed, and they'll continue to exist long after this anti-trans panic has faded.
"Arty" knows he is surrounded by homophobes in the anti-trans movement, and when he gets an attack of conscience, he'll call it out, usually with very, very little support, because, again, a lot of his "better friends" are just as homophobic as they are transphobic.
What happened here is that Graham and other "gender critical" people welcome a guy who called himself "suffragents" who turned out to have knocked his ex-girlfriend "the fuck out" (his actual words.) But who's the "scumbag" here? Me (and others) for calling it out, apparently. 1/
"How was Graham to know?" as if Graham hasn't spent the last 5 years saying that every trans rights advocate was a "friend of Peter's" after this random guy (who Graham followed!) tweeted some trans supportive tweets, and was subsequently convicted of child abuse. 2/
The point is that "gender criticism" attracts misogynistic men. Not a few weeks ago, Posie Parker knowingly appeared on the YouTube channel of a convicted domestic abuser to appeal to his followers. This is the movement that retweets men like Steven Crowder as if...3/
.@jk_rowling has said that her "gender critical" campaigning is informed by her experience of domestic violence, and wanting to protect other women, and yet the "suffragents" (puke) guy she just followed once knocked his ex-girlfriend "the fuck out" (his words, indicating pride.)
Here's the guys pinned post trying to explain it away because of provocation, and look at the "gender critical feminists" in his replies accepting him explaining it away. No guy who truly regrets punching a woman says "I knocked her the fuck out."
And this comes hot on the heels of Rowling describing Posie Parker as a "genius" a few weeks after she knowing appeared on the Youtube channel of a convicted domestic abuser.
This claim is to be "in this" because of being implaccably against domestic violence is in tatters.
- "groomer" rhetoric hypocrisy
- a cited study actually says the opposite of what claimed
- Oli dismissing other studies as conspiracy
- obvious grifting.
For years, this is always how bad "gender critical" arguments have been.
There's much more in this debate than I can summarise in a single tweet, but if you're 100% "gender critical" before watching it, and 100% GC after watching it, I don't know what to tell you about your critical thinking abilities.
Realise that there's nothing "intellectual" about your "beliefs."
Oli has simply picked up your nonsense propaganda, along with classic Religious Right anti-LGBT+ rhetoric to sell a book and get attention and make money. That's how cheap and easy and nothing your "beliefs" are.
Transphobes book a venue for a transphobic event.
The venue realise it's a transphobic event and cancel it.
The transphobes take a legal case, claiming their transphobia is actually a belief called "gender criticism."
This is nothing short of using the legal system for thuggery.
People breaking the window of a venue would cause it far less financial damage than that.
"Nice venue you have there, be a shame if we crowdfunded 100s of thousands to sue you if you stopped us holding our "gender critical" event."
"Gender criticism" is simply a cover for anti-trans activism.
These are secularists borrowing a trick from the Religious Right, who might get legal protection for being objectively homophobic by claiming homophobia as a religious belief.