Thread 1) @elonmusk is promoting racist misinformation in the wake of the #allentx shootings. There are a number of examples but I want to focus on this graph, which has been shared and liked hundreds of thousands of times. What's the story behind it, and why is it misleading?
2/ The graph is shared by an account called 'end wokeness' (agenda much), and the message is quite clear. 'Black-on-white violence is the biggest form of interracial violence but media focuses more on white-on-black violence'. First, where's the data from?
3/ The numbers presented are actually accurate and taken from a 2018 US Bureau of Statistics Report on Violent Victimization. Specifically, the data is taken from Table 14. However, the original table is not just about 'inter-racial' violent incidents bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pd…
4/ It is about inter-racial (between different race or ethnicity) and intra-racial (between the same race or ethnicity). The first thing that the graph maker did was to selectively present the figures to relate to inter-racial violence only. This has a profound visual impact
5/ As @GeorgeTakei 's response to Musk indicates, if you factor in white-on-white violence the graph looks dramatically different, as white-on-white violence is clearly the highest in the table. However, this is perhaps not the biggest problem
6/ The original report presented the information as percentages, not raw numbers. This is because percentages factor in the relationship with the number of victims as a whole. White victims are more likely to be victims because they makeup around 60% of the US population
7/ population, while Black or African Americans make up around 12% of the pop. In fact, the US bureau of statistics makes a point to create rolling averages in order to highlight this very point. As the graph below shows, the rates of white on black and black on whites aresimilar
8/ The graph gives the misleading impression that inter-racial violence, and particularly black-on-white violence, is the biggest issue in the States. In fact, intra-racial violence is by far the largest proportion of violent victimization incidents
9/ This brings us to @elonmusk, who replies wondering why the media would 'misrepresent the "real" situation'. Musk is doing several things here. Firstly, he is amplifying the graph by replying. Secondly, he is endorsing the graph as an accurate reflection of crime statistics
10/ in the US. Thirdly, he is making unfounded claims about the media coverage in the US of crime (a straw man). While findings vary about coverage of violent perpetrators in US news media, most studies tend to find that white people are OVERREPRESENTED as victims in crime
11/ Many studies tend also to find that black perpetrators are overrepresented, but the idea that the media focus on white-on-black violence lacks any substantial basis, with white victims (especially white women) overrpesented as victims.
12/ So the maker of the graph meme has done several things. 1) Disaggregated data to raw numbers to make them appear more sensational 2) Excluded data from the original report in order to emphasise black-on-white violence 3) Added a straw man in terms of how media covers crime
13/ These selective manipulations can be termed 'misleading statistics', and qualify as mis or disinformation (depending on whether you see it as deliberate). I just prefer to call it 'deception', since there is a clear desire to mislead to promote harm
14/ Hundreds of thousands of people have liked or retweeted the graph (not all in agreement), and Musk has essentially endorsed it. That such content flourishes in the wake of such tragedies again highlight attempts to exploit them for the purpose of societal polarisation
15/ So @EndWokeness is right about one thing, 'Perspective IS everything'. You can manipulate graphs and stats to suit your agenda, and maybe, the tech 'genius' Musk will embrace your content uncritically, cos he's a great scientist...
16/ And in case it wasn't clear, to share content that engages in manipulation to frame black people as inherently more violent is racist. To embrace that uncritically is ignorant, and probably reflects confirmation bias.
17/ Just an addendum. The US bureau of statistics reports are fairly descriptive, and of course do not go into various reasons that can motivate forms of violence, e.g. relative inequality, deprivation etc. There is plenty of good reading out there on this.
18/ These should always be factored in when trying to examine extant discrepancies in inter-racial or intra-racial violence (as well as institutional violence, e.g. police violence). Statistics only tell a very partial story and don't always offer explanatory power.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On 13/08, a fake quote attributed to Hamas official Khalil al-Hayya circulated on X:
“The countdown to the next massacre has begun. Next time we will slaughter all the Jews"
It was debunked, but Gemini later stated it as fact >
2/ Firstly, this super sus account was the first I could find spreading the rumour on X (7.49 am UK time 13/08). @RonanMark572778 - whoever this 'pilot and physician' is has sent >113k tweets since July 2023. He also has a verified account (rememeber verification = algo boost).
3/ The narrative then was picked up on X by other accounts and influencers, changing ever so slightly. Accounts like @FleurHassanN @thevoicetruth1 (lol) got a lot of engagement and 'legitimised' the rumour.
NOTE: Not one of these accounts is providing a source to the quote.
🧵🚨1/ This verified X account posing as an American doctor has been spreading pro-Israel propaganda, justifying the killing of journalists, and posting predominantly anti–Sudanese Armed Forces content. The account is fake.>
#disinformation #gazagenocide #Sudan
2/ The first clear red flags are the tweets versus creation date ratio.
The account was created in 2009, but has only tweeted 1090 times, and the first of those was on April 2025. This means the account has been appropriated/hacked/bought and its old tweets scrubbed.
3/ I located the unique user id of the account. I ran this user id via the botometer archive of bots and it tells me that in February 2023 the account was called 'sitaramks', not 'nate_jone'
1/ Propaganda botnet alert! About 50 accounts, tweeting in English & Arabic, have pushed out thousands of posts about #Sudan’s war over the past few months. Almost all certainly using genAI, all pushing a pro-UAE, anti-SAF & anti Muslim (Brotherhood) narrative. #disinformation
2/ They all follow the same script:
> Blame Burhan, the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Muslim Brotherhood for Sudan’s suffering.
> Praise the UAE for “stability” and “humanitarian aid.”
> Wrap it all in moral language about peace, tolerance, and unity.
3/ Much of the phrasing is synthetic: with odd, weird idioms, and em dashes. Classic traces of Chat GPT or another LLM agent. The slogans repeat across accounts:
e.g. “Brotherhood’s Butler”, “Brotherhood in Uniform”, “Ministry of Brotherhood Enforcement”, "Sudan bleeds"
🤖 1/ Ok this is pretty wild. I saw some sus pro-Israel astroturfing activity on a BBCNews Facebook post about aid arriving in Gaza. Lots of Hasbara comments like "Hamas will take the aid". The following 2 identical posts were side by side so I looked into it. #disinformation
2/ Specifically I looked at Dean O' Connor. Firstly up, there were two almost identical Dean O'connor pages, both created on consecutive days last week (15 + 16 May). The one that posted is the one on the right.
3/ When I reverse image searched the picture I was inundated with dozens of pages from forums about romance scams asking about people using this same picture. A lot of people scammed out of thousands. Someone even asked on Quora about O'Connor!
Macron Cocaine Thread/ - The first 10 hours of the @EmmanuelMacron @Keir_Starmer @ZelenskyyUa Cocaine disinformation.
Seemed to be promoted initially by a few dubious accounts like @Veritiste @SitgesFranck @99percentyouth @SilentlySirs @goddeketal
#disinformation
2/ Before being boosted by the right-wing ecosystem and conspiracy accounts e.g. @DineshDSouza @RealAlexJones @CollinRugg. No serious journalists reported this story (because it's absurd). Nonetheless, those tweeting in the first 10 hours generated over 103 million views on X!
3/ The boosting of the info by Putin's envoy Kirill Dmitriev was via Alex Jones, who as the above timeline shows - wasn't the first to put it out on X - but the most widely viewed.
🚨1/ Fake News Alert: A number of accounts are spreading false information that a church in #Wales was burned down by two Pakistan migrants/muslims. There are other narratives, but this is the dominant one. It is false but has obtained millions of views. some data> #disinfo
2/ It is true that a church did burn down. It was set alight by two local teenagers. The South Wales police have tweeted that other rumours circulating are false - they are of course talking about the false info about the ethnicity of the attackers (right).
3/ The most shared claim comes from 'RadioEuropes'. This is a 'Dysinfluencer' account - an account that repeatedly spreads false and malicious information - in this case xenophobic and anti-Muslim content. You can see its false tweet garnered over 3.6 million views