Thread 1) @elonmusk is promoting racist misinformation in the wake of the #allentx shootings. There are a number of examples but I want to focus on this graph, which has been shared and liked hundreds of thousands of times. What's the story behind it, and why is it misleading?
2/ The graph is shared by an account called 'end wokeness' (agenda much), and the message is quite clear. 'Black-on-white violence is the biggest form of interracial violence but media focuses more on white-on-black violence'. First, where's the data from?
3/ The numbers presented are actually accurate and taken from a 2018 US Bureau of Statistics Report on Violent Victimization. Specifically, the data is taken from Table 14. However, the original table is not just about 'inter-racial' violent incidents bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pd…
4/ It is about inter-racial (between different race or ethnicity) and intra-racial (between the same race or ethnicity). The first thing that the graph maker did was to selectively present the figures to relate to inter-racial violence only. This has a profound visual impact
5/ As @GeorgeTakei 's response to Musk indicates, if you factor in white-on-white violence the graph looks dramatically different, as white-on-white violence is clearly the highest in the table. However, this is perhaps not the biggest problem
6/ The original report presented the information as percentages, not raw numbers. This is because percentages factor in the relationship with the number of victims as a whole. White victims are more likely to be victims because they makeup around 60% of the US population
7/ population, while Black or African Americans make up around 12% of the pop. In fact, the US bureau of statistics makes a point to create rolling averages in order to highlight this very point. As the graph below shows, the rates of white on black and black on whites aresimilar
8/ The graph gives the misleading impression that inter-racial violence, and particularly black-on-white violence, is the biggest issue in the States. In fact, intra-racial violence is by far the largest proportion of violent victimization incidents
9/ This brings us to @elonmusk, who replies wondering why the media would 'misrepresent the "real" situation'. Musk is doing several things here. Firstly, he is amplifying the graph by replying. Secondly, he is endorsing the graph as an accurate reflection of crime statistics
10/ in the US. Thirdly, he is making unfounded claims about the media coverage in the US of crime (a straw man). While findings vary about coverage of violent perpetrators in US news media, most studies tend to find that white people are OVERREPRESENTED as victims in crime
11/ Many studies tend also to find that black perpetrators are overrepresented, but the idea that the media focus on white-on-black violence lacks any substantial basis, with white victims (especially white women) overrpesented as victims.
12/ So the maker of the graph meme has done several things. 1) Disaggregated data to raw numbers to make them appear more sensational 2) Excluded data from the original report in order to emphasise black-on-white violence 3) Added a straw man in terms of how media covers crime
13/ These selective manipulations can be termed 'misleading statistics', and qualify as mis or disinformation (depending on whether you see it as deliberate). I just prefer to call it 'deception', since there is a clear desire to mislead to promote harm
14/ Hundreds of thousands of people have liked or retweeted the graph (not all in agreement), and Musk has essentially endorsed it. That such content flourishes in the wake of such tragedies again highlight attempts to exploit them for the purpose of societal polarisation
15/ So @EndWokeness is right about one thing, 'Perspective IS everything'. You can manipulate graphs and stats to suit your agenda, and maybe, the tech 'genius' Musk will embrace your content uncritically, cos he's a great scientist...
16/ And in case it wasn't clear, to share content that engages in manipulation to frame black people as inherently more violent is racist. To embrace that uncritically is ignorant, and probably reflects confirmation bias.
17/ Just an addendum. The US bureau of statistics reports are fairly descriptive, and of course do not go into various reasons that can motivate forms of violence, e.g. relative inequality, deprivation etc. There is plenty of good reading out there on this.
18/ These should always be factored in when trying to examine extant discrepancies in inter-racial or intra-racial violence (as well as institutional violence, e.g. police violence). Statistics only tell a very partial story and don't always offer explanatory power.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵1/ I analysed the headline and lead paragraph of 536 English news articles including the terms "Maccabi" + "Amsterdam" and classified them using Claude 3.5 Sonnet to determine how many framed Israelis as victims or non-Israelis as primary victims (as well as both).
2/ The results are fairly striking. 65% of articles frame Israelis as the victim, while only 5% frame Non-Israelis as victims. 24% are neutral while 9% framed both groups as victims. Quite clear the media emphasised violence as anti-Israeli and antisemitic, especially early on
3/ There isn't much evidence too of corrective framing at this point, although a small increase in neutral framing a week after the incident. Israeli victimhood was categorised as emphasis of violence initiated by non-Israelis, and focus on anti-Israeli or antisemitic violence
🧵 1/ Part of understanding what is going on in Amsterdam is also to understand the coordinated anti-Arab, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant campaigns run with huge amounts of money targeting Europe. Here's a short private Eye article about an investigation I did with @SohanDsouza
2/ Here's a write-up by @karamballes on the campaign in @BylineTimes "Disinformation Campaign on Social Media Reached More Than 40 Million People – but Meta ‘Alarmingly’ Hasn't Revealed the Culprits' bylinetimes.com/2024/08/30/qat…
@karamballes @BylineTimes 3/ ...How a covert influence campaign helped Europe’s far right
Our findings about the shadowy multi-platform operation attacking Qatar and stoking Islamophobia to further its far-right agenda in Europe and beyond call for immediate action. aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/…
🧵🚨1/ This is nuts. After mysteriously deleting a package covering the Amsterdam protests, Sky News have put up a new version. The new version completely changes the thrust to emphasise that the violence was antisemitic. See the opening screenshot change below
2/Even the tweet accompanying the video has changed. It has explicitly shifted from mentioning anti-Arab slogans to removing the phrase "anti-Arab" and using antisemitism. It also removes mention of vandalism by Israeli fans. An extremely clear editorial shift!
3/ They have also inserted into the video, right after the opening footage of Dutch Prime Minister condemning antisemitsm. This was not in the original video.
1/ If you break down the BBC's live reporting of what happened in Amsterdam, you can see the disproportionate attention it pays to Maccabi fans and Israelis as victims, with far less attention paid to the actions of Maccabi fans. Here are the sources interviewed.
2/ In terms of mentions of Arab, Dutch or other Ajax fans, there is very little emphasis on Arab safety, with the majority of coverage focused on Maccabi fans as victims. There are vox pops with fans, but very little interaction with non-Maccabi people.
3/ The language used to describe the attacks on the Maccabi fans is also much stronger, ranging from pogroms to brutal and shocking. Similar terms aren't use for the anti-Arab racism.
🚨1/ This New York Times piece is wild. Let's go through it.
Firstly, the lede is an emphasis that attacks in Amsterdam were based on antisemitism, yet it cites no evidence of this, but DOES cite evidence of anti-Arab chants.
2/ The claims of antisemitism are based primarily on the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, who tweeted that the attacks were antisemitic. Note - the Dutch Prime Minister didn't call out anti-Arab or anti-Palestinian racism from Maccabi fans.
3/ The piece links to an Amsterdam police statement to talk about the violence - although the police statement doesn't mention anything about antisemitism.
🧵 'At least 1,800 bots on the social media site X are promoting the controversial choice of Azerbaijan, a major oil and gas producer, to host next month’s ...#COP29, according to a new analysis shared exclusively with The Washington Post".
2/ The analysis by Marc Owen Jones, an expert on disinformation at @NUQatar, focused on roughly 2,800 X accounts that collectively sent around 10,800 tweets, retweets and replies about the conference between Oct. 17 and Oct. 24.
3/ Detection
73% of all accounts active in sample created in the space of 3 quarters in 2024.
Conservative estimates suggest 66% (1876) accounts in the sample are fake (bots) based on activity over the past week