Marc Owen Jones Profile picture
May 10 18 tweets 7 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Thread 1) @elonmusk is promoting racist misinformation in the wake of the #allentx shootings. There are a number of examples but I want to focus on this graph, which has been shared and liked hundreds of thousands of times. What's the story behind it, and why is it misleading? Image
2/ The graph is shared by an account called 'end wokeness' (agenda much), and the message is quite clear. 'Black-on-white violence is the biggest form of interracial violence but media focuses more on white-on-black violence'. First, where's the data from? Image
3/ The numbers presented are actually accurate and taken from a 2018 US Bureau of Statistics Report on Violent Victimization. Specifically, the data is taken from Table 14. However, the original table is not just about 'inter-racial' violent incidents bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pd… Image
4/ It is about inter-racial (between different race or ethnicity) and intra-racial (between the same race or ethnicity). The first thing that the graph maker did was to selectively present the figures to relate to inter-racial violence only. This has a profound visual impact Image
5/ As @GeorgeTakei 's response to Musk indicates, if you factor in white-on-white violence the graph looks dramatically different, as white-on-white violence is clearly the highest in the table. However, this is perhaps not the biggest problem Image
6/ The original report presented the information as percentages, not raw numbers. This is because percentages factor in the relationship with the number of victims as a whole. White victims are more likely to be victims because they makeup around 60% of the US population Image
7/ population, while Black or African Americans make up around 12% of the pop. In fact, the US bureau of statistics makes a point to create rolling averages in order to highlight this very point. As the graph below shows, the rates of white on black and black on whites aresimilar Image
8/ The graph gives the misleading impression that inter-racial violence, and particularly black-on-white violence, is the biggest issue in the States. In fact, intra-racial violence is by far the largest proportion of violent victimization incidents
9/ This brings us to @elonmusk, who replies wondering why the media would 'misrepresent the "real" situation'. Musk is doing several things here. Firstly, he is amplifying the graph by replying. Secondly, he is endorsing the graph as an accurate reflection of crime statistics Image
10/ in the US. Thirdly, he is making unfounded claims about the media coverage in the US of crime (a straw man). While findings vary about coverage of violent perpetrators in US news media, most studies tend to find that white people are OVERREPRESENTED as victims in crime ImageImage
11/ Many studies tend also to find that black perpetrators are overrepresented, but the idea that the media focus on white-on-black violence lacks any substantial basis, with white victims (especially white women) overrpesented as victims.
12/ So the maker of the graph meme has done several things.
1) Disaggregated data to raw numbers to make them appear more sensational
2) Excluded data from the original report in order to emphasise black-on-white violence
3) Added a straw man in terms of how media covers crime
13/ These selective manipulations can be termed 'misleading statistics', and qualify as mis or disinformation (depending on whether you see it as deliberate). I just prefer to call it 'deception', since there is a clear desire to mislead to promote harm ImageImage
14/ Hundreds of thousands of people have liked or retweeted the graph (not all in agreement), and Musk has essentially endorsed it. That such content flourishes in the wake of such tragedies again highlight attempts to exploit them for the purpose of societal polarisation
15/ So @EndWokeness is right about one thing, 'Perspective IS everything'. You can manipulate graphs and stats to suit your agenda, and maybe, the tech 'genius' Musk will embrace your content uncritically, cos he's a great scientist... Image
16/ And in case it wasn't clear, to share content that engages in manipulation to frame black people as inherently more violent is racist. To embrace that uncritically is ignorant, and probably reflects confirmation bias.
17/ Just an addendum. The US bureau of statistics reports are fairly descriptive, and of course do not go into various reasons that can motivate forms of violence, e.g. relative inequality, deprivation etc. There is plenty of good reading out there on this.
18/ These should always be factored in when trying to examine extant discrepancies in inter-racial or intra-racial violence (as well as institutional violence, e.g. police violence). Statistics only tell a very partial story and don't always offer explanatory power.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Marc Owen Jones

Marc Owen Jones Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @marcowenjones

May 11
🧵Thread 1/ Does a reply on Twitter from @elonmusk help amplify misleading information? While common sense tells us yes, facts & figures are helpful!

In this thread, I explore to what extent Musk's endorsement of a misleading and racist tweet from @EndWokeness helped amplify it Image
2/ As many of you know, Musk replied to the below tweet showing a misleading and partial interpretation of violent incident statistics in the US.

The original tweet by @EndWokeness was sent on May 5th at 19:14 Coordinated Univeral Time UTC). Musk replied on 6 May at 06.57 UTC Image
3/ (I have written UTC in red as our browsers convert UTC into local time).

In order to determine the influence of Musk's reply, we should explore the engagement with the End Wokeness tweet both before and after Musk's intervention.
Read 12 tweets
Mar 31
A.I., Brain Scans and Cameras: The Spread of Police Surveillance Tech nyti.ms/42UpHXy
A lack of transparency and oversight for the way surveillance technologies are used opens up the potential for abuse, said Marc O. Jones, author of the book “Digital Authoritarianism in the Middle East” and a professor at Hamad Bin Khalifa University in Qatar.
“The region has become so securitized, and under M.B.Z., the U.A.E. has become so focused on security there’s almost this fetishization of technology,” he said.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 30
🧵 1/ This is what 286,000 tweets, retweets and replies calling Joe Biden a 'pedophile' look like. This is just the past 8 months too.
2/ The claim, which dates back to at least 2020, and which was previously debunked, is not going away. This graph shows that there are thousands of tweets per month about Biden being a pedo. At least once a month, one of these goes viral, getting thousands of RTs
3/ Below shows a recent viral tweet from @DineshDSouza - with an unverified screenshot from Ashley Biden's diary where she claims she was molested by her dad. Ashley Biden's diary was reportedly stolen & sold to Project Veritas, a far right group that creates deceptive content
Read 10 tweets
Mar 28
1) Hateful misleading information does require a certain amount of ignorance and/or malice. Take this "meme", it singles out 4 mass shooters who identified as non binary or trans. It OMITS the fact 2831 mass shootings occurred since 2018 when these four shootings occurred Image
2) Four out of 2831 is around 0.1%. Meanwhile, 98% of shootings are carried out by men, a fact which is not mentioned here. Shootings have increased since 2019. One expert interviewed by the BBC even suggested "toxic masculinity" might be one among several variables responsible Image
3) for the increase. This animosity towards minorities and the lgbtq community was evident when fake news spread about the Uvalde shooter being trans. Again, it points to a demonisation of marginalised groups while ignoring the giant elephant in the room - guns used by men
Read 5 tweets
Mar 27
Fascinating, the UAE paid a Swiss-private investigator (and smear campaigner) to dig up 'dirt' on the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe. What resulted was a colossal campaign in which this mercenary essentially monetised smearing anyone who was within

newyorker.com/magazine/2023/…
earshot of someone close to the Muslim brotherhood. One American lost his business as a result. The piece reveals a number of other things.

1) Reputational damage and manipulating Wikipedia has real world consequences
2) The industry of paid-for-writers who write hit pieces is
probably much bigger than we think (this campaign involved paying freelance writer in London, as well as journalists)
3) Academics can be and are used as 'cutouts' for such operations to feed journalists.
4) Humanitarian aid has suffered as a result of these smear campaigns
Read 12 tweets
Mar 8
1/5 Since Musk's official take over of Twitter, a very antisemitic, racist and white victimhood/supremacist hashtag has been consistently visible. Around 40,000 tweets from approx 16,000 unique accounts have been involved on the hashtag that spreads conspiracy theories, Image
2/5 From vile antisemitic caricatures and stereotypes to thinly veiled holocaust denial, the hashtag is promoting the idea of a global Jewish cabal controlling the world - including creating Covid19. ImageImageImageImage
3/5 It doesn't look like it's going away. From its initial trend in October/November 2022 (when Musk took over) to now, it still appears fairly consistent in terms of tweet numbers. There is also nothing being done about it - all accounts promoting it back in Oct are still here Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(