$mmtlp "The deposit losses at JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo ($464.7 billion) are more than twice of 4,000 small banks lost in total during the same period. Their combined loss in deposits was just $210 billion."
JPM cusip # 9R33424
WF # 591994371
BOA cusip # ??
$mmtlp My thinking is:
1. I can hold indefinitely (can't speak for others)
2. NBH requested SEC comment (69 workdays ago), or else they will go on with their plan
3. SEC knows about the N.shorts; they have Blue data - ALL RADARS WENT OFF
4. # of Beneficial Owners UNKNOWN
5. Nov 29, 2021 foia email revealed top Fraud dept & 3 SEC officers were looking into $mmtlp 2 months after it began trading contrary to its purpose & plan
6. Dec 2, 2033 FOIA email reveals finra fraud dept & SEC received several tips from someone or perhaps multiple sources.
7. Dec 5, 2022 FOIA email reveals $MMTLP hit Fraud teams radar & a lot of OTHER RADAR screens
8. All top Fraud dept guys at SEC & Finra still involved
9. SEC been in touch with Finras General Councels office & Patti
10. Dec 6, 2023 Corp notice issued
11. Dec 8, notice revised
Sec officers & the HEADS @ finras fraud dept were looking into $mmtlp since Nov 29, 2021.
Mmtlp hit ALL their fraud radars including "other radars"
I am confident that no one at $trch or $mmat or next bridge committed fraud - mmtlp purpose plan all submitted in sec filings
$mmtlp In my opinion:
IF just a few million naked shorts in next bridge existed, why are the top fraud dept guys at finra & SEC getting tipped off, doing zoom calls, speaking to Finra's G.C.O.
SEC wud have issued a comment on the S1, if the problem was easy to resolve
$mmtlp in my opinion:
For all the reasons above & more, I believe naked shorts in next bridge are above 500,000,000.
06.24.2021 - Mmtlp issued & mirrored trch naked positions, which increased after it began trading 10.6.2021
$mmtlp 2 months ago I tweeted about the Securities Act 1933, "Section 8A(b) - hearing will be fixed between 30-60 days after service of notice INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS to "respondent(s)"
Feb 1st, 2023- s1 amendment filed requesting SEC comment; 68 days
$mmtlp - Pg.28 10k filing by NBH on March 31, 2023:
"In computing the number of holders of record, all broker-dealers & clearing corporation holding shares on behalf of its customers, the holders of the common stock, is counted as a single shareholder....
64,000 NBH common stock holders, "INCLUDES" broker-dealers & clearing corporations as "SINGLE SHAREHOLDERS"
I interpret this to mean, if TD Ameritrade has 1000 accounts with 50,000,000 $MMTLP NBH stock, that AST has registered TDA as 1 Shareholder representing all those accounts
$mmtlp New Video - Breakdown of @FINRA Question 4 - has a lot of important info.
I've provided my understanding of what Finra is stating.
I recommend investors watch this 5 minute video & think about the summary.
I will post more info here
@FINRA $mmtlp the Federal Law that Finra may be referring to cud be Reg S and Rule 144A:
Qualified Institutional Buyer = QIB
Rule 144A provides a mechanism for the sale of securities that are privately placed to QIBs that do not—and are NOT required—to have an SEC registration in… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
@FINRA $MMTLP I asked chat GPT about Rule 144A & Reg S:
@FINRA Exceptions for SEC RULE 15c2-11 do NOT apply to non-tradable Series A preferred Dividend shares, dividend shares which were specifically made & approved by the @SECGov for investors to receive a dividend from the sale of Oil & Gas assets which were then spun off into NBH; $mmtlp
May 28, 2021 - $TRCH submits S3 (#:333-256632) to SEC - TRCH provides the SEC with a general description MMTLP, Common Stock, Warrants, Rights, Units and let's them know they will keep info up-to-date
June 14, 2021 - @SECGov Notice of Effectiveness for 333-256632
@FINRA in relations to your modified Q&A regarding $MMTLP, can you provide:
1. Proof of the "coding issues"(screenshot); 2. The names of the broker-dealer(s) that relied on an exception to SEC Rule 15c2-11 to get $mmtlp to trade contrary to the instructions of the company CEOs;
@FINRA 3. The CEO's & Retail alerted @finra of $mmtlp illegally trading, why didn't @finra issue a halt to explain the situation as you did in this Q&A to "protect" investors?
4. MMTLP given to TRCH holders prior to merger with MMAT. Original S1 states MMTLP wud get divi from sale of… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…