Part of that was down to a high level of coordination in govt about the messaging: this was a meeting of minds and a win for hard negotiating with EU, rather than any kind of sell-out
Fine, as far as it went
4/
But #REUL is different, as there's no (formal) cross-linkage, despite some people's suspicions
And the UQ happening now is mostly MPs blaming govt too
8/
So this is becoming all very personalised, which might concern Sunak, who's built up his rep during 2023 on 'getting things done'
9/
It's also telling that while backbenches seemed to cope with deals with the EU, they aren't taking unilateral 'flakiness' (my word) nearly so well, suggesting that there remain strong limits on how biddable they are
10/
Evidently, we're not in full-blown rebellion yet and #REULBill amendments are likely to pass, but this hurts Sunak's narrative and all remaining plans for UK-EU coop in this Parliament
11/
And to finish, we might put all this back on the continuing unwillingness of No.10 (and not just the current resident) to try to be more open about what it's doing
While not unprecedented, it's unusual for such a letter to be written: treat it as a demonstration of collective intent and openness
2/
For those in the UK unfamiliar with #EuropeDay, it's the main occasion when the EU recalls its roots in the 1950 Schuman Declaration as a peace project, hence the opening of the letter
UK govt is fully able to fund any unilateral action it likes, so if it can't resolve the Horizon funding issue, then it can just go it alone, as it has already done to some extent
So it's all good, right?
Not really
Money is only one part of why Horizon is attractive: it's the scale of transnational networks that can be pulled together that's at least as important
Economies of scale apply to expertise as much as funds
That's not a problem by itself, but the SI appears to be creating new powers for that committee that go beyond what's in the Protocol/Framework itself
3/