US Politicians and political parties both Democrats and Republicans blame that voting machines are flawed, they can be hacked into and change votes and voting patterns.
They say mail in votes are bad and rigged. A thread 🧵 for awareness.
Voting is all a facade. If elections and voting made any difference, would you seriously think they’d let you vote, elections would be illegal.
Every voting machine is hackable under most circumstances. They say they don’t connect to the internet, but they do. For most machines, it’s easy to get full admin access in under two minutes.
They wouldn’t let us audit elections, audit the pentagon, audit the federal reserve system nor the flow of funds into the ukraine war funding.
IF ELECTIONS MATTERED OR VOTING MADE ANY DIFFERENCE, YOU KNOW THAT’D MAKE THOSE ILLEGAL
There are usually high hopes for people in Democratic nations on the politicians they elect.
What they were promised in elections vs. What they actually achieve after winning elections are quite a contrast.
WHAT YOU GET AFTER IS NOT WHAT YOU WERE PROMISED EARLIER
It’s all one big cartel. Central banks, #BigPharma, weapons manufacturers, corporate media and your governments. Elections are just a facade to make you feel you’re in control of who gets elected, but in fact most of these phony leaders are chosen by and sold to highest bidder.
The last three elections in USA were all rigged and CIA was in the middle of it.
Every country blames another for meddling in their elections.
China - you guys have elections 😂
I don’t always vote, but when I do I make sure I’m from a swing state
ALL prominent DEMOCRATS talked about how dangerous voting machines were before the 2018 elections. They could be hacked, could switch votes, they said.
Now, they blast anyone who questions them.
COMPLAIN ONLY WHEN YOU LOSE. TAKE CREDIT WHEN YOU WIN.
COMPLAIN WHEN YOU LOSE, TAKE ALL THE CREDIT WHEN YOU WIN.
BOTH PARTIES DO THIS EVERY ELECTION CYCLE, NOTHING CHANGES
How to steal an election
New *video evidence* of Maricopa Arizona, USA election officials illegally breaking into sealed election machines after they were tested, reprogramming memory cards, and reinstalling them #ElectionFraud
@KariLake should’ve won easily
81 million votes for Joe Biden, a two time loser presidential candidate with one of the most unpopular VP candidate in modern history.
Joe Biden is a puppet of Obama.
Obama is a #DeepState puppet.
#DeepState runs the show, no matter who wins or loses the elections.
Make mail in ballots illegal in all 50 states
HBO made this documentary after Stacy Abrams 2018 loss in Georgia to prove that voting machines can be hacked. This left leaning documentary proves we can not have free and fair elections using voting machines. #KillChain
Great… you got a sticker for voting
Politicians vs. Voters
The idiots are gonna vote for the uniparty again 🤷♂️
This is what election fraud looks like
If you believe Biden really won the elections without cheating, then you will believe these polls.
If not you already know they’re all fake.
Yes the game is rigged against you
Yes the elections are rigged as well
Rioters then vs. Rioters now
It’s a uniparty supporting the #MilitaryIndustrialComplex #BigPharmaComplex #MediaCensorshipComplex
Tucker Carlson:
“Nobody would say Joe Biden was a great candidate. He didn't campaign. Nobody said I want my kid to grow up to be Joe Biden. So, how did Biden get 81 million votes, 15 million more than Barack Obama?”
Great question… we all know how
Voting to either party is horrible when you have politicians on both sides sold out to corporate interests
You wanna shoot yourself with red bullet or blue bullet, your choice
The real 52% don’t care because they know it’s all a uniparty shit-show
How the heck did Joe Biden get 81 million votes, 15 million more than Barack Obama 🤷♂️
Myth: Voting makes a difference
Reality: Elections are rigged as usual
Elections are what happens when we allow corrupt individuals to rise to positions of power where they feel empowered to commit fraud openly
Though the entire country knows fraud is being committed, half don’t care because THEY THINK it’s in their favor
Just take a wild guess and make it 81 million or something
Keep hiring the wrong people and end up like America… wow that hit a nerve
Vote harder… hope for the better
If I was the #DeepState…
— I would rig the elections
— I would arrest my opposition
— I would control all the media
— I would confuse young people
— would indoctrinate instead of educate
So essentially Ron DeSantis agrees with Democrats more than Republicans
It’s always the uniparty bullshit that gets the bills passed together which benefit them and empower them
Voting machines and ballot scanners are the best things to happen to elections since sliced bread…
Just kidding, elections are plain scams
The probability of mail in ballots being in the correct sequence is 1 in trillions, a lot worse than winning a lottery. But they were in proper sequence in 2000.
IT’S AS IF THEY WERE ALL MANUFACTURED
Poll workers from 2020
- All duplicate ballots were for Democrats
- All challenges were straight refused
- Poll workers changed ballots to democrats with no due process
- Honest poll workers were shutout completely citing COVID restrictions
The election deniers
When they’re not confident Biden is gonna win, when they’re confident they can manipulate mail in ballots
This is what you’ll hear
❌ American media is corrupt
❌ American unions are corrupt
❌ American congress is corrupt
❌ American Wall Street is corrupt
✅ American elections are not corrupt
Make this make sense?
Listen to this Georgia poll watcher who says it’s statistically impossible to get batches of votes completely for Joe Biden
Voting fraud in 2020: Former Trump official Andrew Kloster confirms bombshell 2020 election fraud report out of Muskegon, Michigan
Voting Democrats vs. Republicans
Kamala Harris talking about offline voting machines and paper ballots
You might as well shut the case down
Michigan AG confirms the 8,000-10,000 ballot registrations turned into the Muskegon city clerk by a Democrat operative were *all* fraudulent. They hid this for 3 years and y’all think this is the only incident?
WEF founder Klaus Schwab talks with Google founder Sergey Brin on the possibility of a future without elections.
This is possible since the AI can predict people’s choices with great accuracy.
Politicians always blame the elections are stolen from you when they don’t win
The elections are fair and square when they win the elections though
Elections in 2020 were completely rigged. The absentee ballots were mostly fake. Hear this Democrat bragging about a car full of absentee ballots in Minnesota. He also says the only way you win elections is with money.
If we win elections are fair
If you win elections are rigged
2020 Election fraud runs deep. The USPS subverted American Democracy on Nov. 3, 2020 by backdating over 100,000 ballots for the 2020 Presidential Election.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The time has come for the UK government to reclaim sovereignty over its borders and protect its citizens by decisively repealing the Human Rights Act and withdrawing from the Refugee Convention. For too long, these outdated frameworks have handcuffed our ability to deport dangerous individuals who exploit the asylum system, leading to a surge in abuse, rapes, and violence perpetrated by immigrants who refuse to assimilate into British society. High-profile cases, such as the Ethiopian asylum seeker charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl in Epping just days after arrival, or the Sudanese migrant convicted of attempting to rape a woman in Wakefield, illustrate the grim reality. With over 200 asylum hotel residents charged with violent and sexual offences in 2025 alone, including multiple rapes, it's clear that the current system prioritizes the rights of foreign criminals over the safety of British families. Repealing these acts would empower swift removals, deter exploitation, and restore public trust in a immigration policy that puts Britain first.
By leaving the Refugee Convention and scrapping the Human Rights Act, we can end the cycle of unchecked migration that has brought chaos to our streets and communities. Immigrants who fail to integrate often form isolated enclaves where criminality festers, as evidenced by reports of arson, theft, and assaults linked to asylum accommodations. The government's own data reveals thousands of assaults and hate crimes within these facilities, but the real victims are ordinary Britons facing elevated risks from those who game the system. A bold exit from these international obligations would allow us to craft bespoke laws that prioritize assimilation, rapid deportation of offenders, and the protection of our values—ensuring a safer, more cohesive United Kingdom for generations to come.
BRITAIN MUST SECURE ITS BORDERS AND STOP THE MASS IMMIGRATION MADNESS
In a deeply disturbing case at Warwick Crown Court, a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton, Warwickshire, was allegedly targeted and raped last July by two asylum seekers, 23-year-old Ahmad Mulakhil and 24-year-old Mohammad Kabir, after they pursued her while she played in a park. The prosecution detailed how Kabir first grabbed and attempted to strangle the visibly young child, trying to force her away, before she escaped—only to later encounter Mulakhil, who led her to a secluded cul-de-sac, where he orally raped her, committed further sexual assaults, took indecent photos, laughed during the attack, and threatened to kill her family if she spoke out. DNA evidence from Mulakhil was found on her, and while he admits to the oral rape, he implausibly claims she consented and appeared in her twenties—a notion dismissed given her childlike appearance. This brutal assault, marked by the perpetrators' callous disregard for her age and vulnerability, exposes the perilous risks of unchecked mass immigration, demanding immediate action: the UK must halt the influx of unvetted asylum seekers and secure its borders to prevent such atrocities and protect its citizens from predatory threats.
Across the United States, an intricate web of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), daycares, autism treatment centers, transportation services, and related facilities has been uncovered in schemes that systematically divert billions in taxpayer dollars intended for child nutrition and care programs. Originating prominently in Minnesota with cases like the Feeding Our Future scandal, this network expanded to involve similar operations in states such as Washington, New York, and California. These entities often pose as legitimate providers for underserved communities, particularly immigrant groups, but exploit federal and state funding streams by fabricating enrollment numbers, inventing fictitious meal services, and establishing shell companies to funnel money. The scale of the fraud has grown to encompass COVID-19 relief funds, leading to federal indictments of dozens of individuals and the recovery of luxury assets purchased with ill-gotten gains.
The mechanics of this money laundering involve sophisticated tactics to steal public funds while maintaining a facade of charitable work. Operators submit inflated reimbursement claims to government programs, claiming to serve thousands of children daily when in reality, facilities may be empty or non-existent. Funds are then cycled through a series of interconnected NGOs and businesses, often involving wire transfers to overseas accounts or investments in real estate and vehicles. In Minnesota alone, prosecutors have described this as the largest pandemic-related fraud in the country, with over $250 million siphoned off initially, ballooning to estimates of up to $9 billion when including related schemes. This laundering not only depletes resources meant for vulnerable families but also undermines trust in social safety nets, as audits reveal minimal oversight allowed the fraud to persist for years.
Enabling this widespread theft are allegations of political complicity, where elected officials in affected states—predominantly Democratic-led—have benefited from campaign contributions tied to fraud perpetrators, potentially influencing lax regulations and delayed investigations. Reports indicate over $50,000 in donations from indicted individuals to Minnesota Democrats, including figures like the state attorney general, raising questions about kickbacks disguised as legitimate political support. This symbiotic relationship allows the network to thrive, as politicians secure election funds while turning a blind eye to red flags, prompting federal interventions like funding freezes across multiple states to curb the abuse. While some claims of direct kickbacks remain unproven, the pattern suggests a cycle of corruption that prioritizes personal and party gains over taxpayer accountability.
A Somalian Democrat in Maine started a money transfer business
- He then bought a commercial real estate building
- In it there are 4 Medicaid funded home health care businesses
- Large bags of cash are being seen sent from it headed to Somalia
Crime statistics stand as irrefutable pillars of truth, drawn from meticulously documented police reports, arrests, and victim surveys compiled by agencies like the FBI and Bureau of Justice Statistics, offering a clear lens into societal realities without bias or agenda. For instance, data reveals that Black males aged 14-49, comprising just 3% of the U.S. population, are responsible for 43% of all murders, a stark disparity rooted in verifiable trends from 1980-2008 and echoed in more recent FBI Uniform Crime Reports showing Black offenders accounting for over 50% of homicides despite being 13% of the population. These numbers aren't fabricated; they're cross-verified through methods like the Supplementary Homicide Reports and National Crime Victimization Survey, exposing patterns that demand attention rather than denial, such as the overrepresentation in violent crimes that persists across decades and guides effective policy when embraced honestly.
Yet, governments and officials often undermine this objectivity by manipulating data or reshaping narratives to fit political ideologies, eroding public trust and hindering real solutions. Examples abound, from the Biden administration's claims of historic crime lows based on selective FBI stats later criticized as misleading, to investigations into D.C. police allegedly altering felony classifications to downplay crime rates, and New York PD's documented pressure on officers to underreport incidents for favorable optics. Such efforts, often driven by a reluctance to address uncomfortable racial disparities, only perpetuate cycles of violence by diverting focus from root causes like socioeconomic factors and urban decay, proving that twisting the truth serves no one and stalls progress toward safer communities.
A thread on three letter agencies and their subordination to political narratives👇
Lip reading, often portrayed in media as a foolproof method for deciphering spoken words from visual cues alone, falls far short of reliability when used as primary evidence in criminal cases. The human mouth produces visually similar movements for numerous words and sounds—consider how "pat," "bat," and "mat" appear nearly identical on the lips—leading to error rates that can exceed 50% even among trained professionals. Factors such as poor lighting, camera angles, facial obstructions like beards or masks, accents, or rapid speech further exacerbate inaccuracies, turning what might seem like clear footage into a guessing game. Studies from organizations like the National Deaf Children's Society highlight that lip reading is context-dependent and subjective, with interpreters potentially injecting unconscious bias or misinterpreting non-verbal cues, rendering it unsuitable as standalone proof of guilt in high-stakes legal proceedings.
In courtrooms, where evidence must meet rigorous standards of admissibility and scientific validity, relying on lip reading as the main pillar of a prosecution risks miscarriages of justice. Legal precedents, such as those in U.S. cases invoking the Daubert standard, emphasize that expert testimony must be based on testable, peer-reviewed methods with known error rates—criteria lip reading often fails to satisfy due to its interpretive nature and lack of standardization. Courts in the UK and elsewhere have similarly dismissed or heavily scrutinized lip reading evidence, noting its vulnerability to challenge and the potential for alternative explanations. Ultimately, elevating such a flawed technique to primary status undermines the principle of "beyond a reasonable doubt," inviting appeals, wrongful convictions, and eroded public trust in the justice system; it should instead serve, at best, as corroborative support alongside more robust forensic or auditory evidence.