US Politicians and political parties both Democrats and Republicans blame that voting machines are flawed, they can be hacked into and change votes and voting patterns.
They say mail in votes are bad and rigged. A thread 🧵 for awareness.
Voting is all a facade. If elections and voting made any difference, would you seriously think they’d let you vote, elections would be illegal.
Every voting machine is hackable under most circumstances. They say they don’t connect to the internet, but they do. For most machines, it’s easy to get full admin access in under two minutes.
They wouldn’t let us audit elections, audit the pentagon, audit the federal reserve system nor the flow of funds into the ukraine war funding.
IF ELECTIONS MATTERED OR VOTING MADE ANY DIFFERENCE, YOU KNOW THAT’D MAKE THOSE ILLEGAL
There are usually high hopes for people in Democratic nations on the politicians they elect.
What they were promised in elections vs. What they actually achieve after winning elections are quite a contrast.
WHAT YOU GET AFTER IS NOT WHAT YOU WERE PROMISED EARLIER
It’s all one big cartel. Central banks, #BigPharma, weapons manufacturers, corporate media and your governments. Elections are just a facade to make you feel you’re in control of who gets elected, but in fact most of these phony leaders are chosen by and sold to highest bidder.
The last three elections in USA were all rigged and CIA was in the middle of it.
Every country blames another for meddling in their elections.
China - you guys have elections 😂
I don’t always vote, but when I do I make sure I’m from a swing state
ALL prominent DEMOCRATS talked about how dangerous voting machines were before the 2018 elections. They could be hacked, could switch votes, they said.
Now, they blast anyone who questions them.
COMPLAIN ONLY WHEN YOU LOSE. TAKE CREDIT WHEN YOU WIN.
COMPLAIN WHEN YOU LOSE, TAKE ALL THE CREDIT WHEN YOU WIN.
BOTH PARTIES DO THIS EVERY ELECTION CYCLE, NOTHING CHANGES
How to steal an election
New *video evidence* of Maricopa Arizona, USA election officials illegally breaking into sealed election machines after they were tested, reprogramming memory cards, and reinstalling them #ElectionFraud
@KariLake should’ve won easily
81 million votes for Joe Biden, a two time loser presidential candidate with one of the most unpopular VP candidate in modern history.
Joe Biden is a puppet of Obama.
Obama is a #DeepState puppet.
#DeepState runs the show, no matter who wins or loses the elections.
Make mail in ballots illegal in all 50 states
HBO made this documentary after Stacy Abrams 2018 loss in Georgia to prove that voting machines can be hacked. This left leaning documentary proves we can not have free and fair elections using voting machines. #KillChain
Great… you got a sticker for voting
Politicians vs. Voters
The idiots are gonna vote for the uniparty again 🤷♂️
This is what election fraud looks like
If you believe Biden really won the elections without cheating, then you will believe these polls.
If not you already know they’re all fake.
Yes the game is rigged against you
Yes the elections are rigged as well
Rioters then vs. Rioters now
It’s a uniparty supporting the #MilitaryIndustrialComplex #BigPharmaComplex #MediaCensorshipComplex
Tucker Carlson:
“Nobody would say Joe Biden was a great candidate. He didn't campaign. Nobody said I want my kid to grow up to be Joe Biden. So, how did Biden get 81 million votes, 15 million more than Barack Obama?”
Great question… we all know how
Voting to either party is horrible when you have politicians on both sides sold out to corporate interests
You wanna shoot yourself with red bullet or blue bullet, your choice
The real 52% don’t care because they know it’s all a uniparty shit-show
How the heck did Joe Biden get 81 million votes, 15 million more than Barack Obama 🤷♂️
Myth: Voting makes a difference
Reality: Elections are rigged as usual
Elections are what happens when we allow corrupt individuals to rise to positions of power where they feel empowered to commit fraud openly
Though the entire country knows fraud is being committed, half don’t care because THEY THINK it’s in their favor
Just take a wild guess and make it 81 million or something
Keep hiring the wrong people and end up like America… wow that hit a nerve
Vote harder… hope for the better
If I was the #DeepState…
— I would rig the elections
— I would arrest my opposition
— I would control all the media
— I would confuse young people
— would indoctrinate instead of educate
So essentially Ron DeSantis agrees with Democrats more than Republicans
It’s always the uniparty bullshit that gets the bills passed together which benefit them and empower them
Voting machines and ballot scanners are the best things to happen to elections since sliced bread…
Just kidding, elections are plain scams
The probability of mail in ballots being in the correct sequence is 1 in trillions, a lot worse than winning a lottery. But they were in proper sequence in 2000.
IT’S AS IF THEY WERE ALL MANUFACTURED
Poll workers from 2020
- All duplicate ballots were for Democrats
- All challenges were straight refused
- Poll workers changed ballots to democrats with no due process
- Honest poll workers were shutout completely citing COVID restrictions
The election deniers
When they’re not confident Biden is gonna win, when they’re confident they can manipulate mail in ballots
This is what you’ll hear
❌ American media is corrupt
❌ American unions are corrupt
❌ American congress is corrupt
❌ American Wall Street is corrupt
✅ American elections are not corrupt
Make this make sense?
Listen to this Georgia poll watcher who says it’s statistically impossible to get batches of votes completely for Joe Biden
Voting fraud in 2020: Former Trump official Andrew Kloster confirms bombshell 2020 election fraud report out of Muskegon, Michigan
Voting Democrats vs. Republicans
Kamala Harris talking about offline voting machines and paper ballots
You might as well shut the case down
Michigan AG confirms the 8,000-10,000 ballot registrations turned into the Muskegon city clerk by a Democrat operative were *all* fraudulent. They hid this for 3 years and y’all think this is the only incident?
WEF founder Klaus Schwab talks with Google founder Sergey Brin on the possibility of a future without elections.
This is possible since the AI can predict people’s choices with great accuracy.
Politicians always blame the elections are stolen from you when they don’t win
The elections are fair and square when they win the elections though
Elections in 2020 were completely rigged. The absentee ballots were mostly fake. Hear this Democrat bragging about a car full of absentee ballots in Minnesota. He also says the only way you win elections is with money.
If we win elections are fair
If you win elections are rigged
2020 Election fraud runs deep. The USPS subverted American Democracy on Nov. 3, 2020 by backdating over 100,000 ballots for the 2020 Presidential Election.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In just three months as the 47th President, Donald Trump has governed with a ferocity that seems fueled by the trials of his past—indictments, investigations, assassination attempts, and impeachments—emerging not as a man diminished, but as one emboldened to deliver on his promises with unrelenting focus. His campaign pledges, once dismissed by critics as bombastic rhetoric, are materializing at a breakneck pace, reflecting a leader who thrives under pressure and channels adversity into action. From sweeping border security measures to economic policies aimed at revitalizing American industry, Trump’s early tenure feels like a defiant rebuttal to those who doubted his resolve, proving that the chaos of his journey has only sharpened his determination to reshape the nation in his image.
What’s most striking is how Trump has turned promises into tangible outcomes, defying the inertia that often bogs down presidencies. He’s tackled illegal immigration with a vigor that’s already shifting the landscape, while imposing tariffs to bolster domestic production, moves that echo his “America First” mantra and resonate with a base hungry for results. Gas, grocery and egg prices have eased, a practical win for everyday Americans, while his administration’s bold strokes—like dismantling bureaucratic excess and confronting global adversaries—signal a rejection of the status quo. For a man who’s faced relentless scrutiny, Trump’s first 90 days suggest not just survival, but a triumphant assertion of his vision, delivering a governance style as unapologetic and unconventional as the path that brought him back to power.
The statement that "more squirrels and raccoons have been arrested than Epstein clients" highlights a stark disparity between the enforcement of minor, even absurd, regulations and the apparent reluctance to pursue justice against powerful individuals implicated in Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal network. In late 2024, the case of Peanut the Squirrel and Fred the Raccoon captured public attention when New York’s Department of Environmental Conservation raided Mark Longo’s home, seizing and euthanizing these animals over claims of illegal possession and rabies risks. The operation involved multiple agents and hours of effort, showcasing a swift and decisive response to what many saw as a trivial violation. This incident, amplified by social media outrage, underscores how authorities can mobilize resources to "arrest" or address wildlife-related issues, even when the targets are harmless pets, while seemingly ignoring far graver human crimes.
In contrast, the Epstein case—despite overwhelming evidence of a sex trafficking operation involving influential figures—has seen remarkably little accountability for his clients. Epstein, a financier with ties to politicians, billionaires, and royalty, was arrested in 2019 and died in custody, officially ruled a suicide, though conspiracy theories abound. Court documents unsealed in recent years name numerous associates, yet few, if any, of these high-profile individuals have faced arrest or prosecution. The disparity fuels public frustration: while a squirrel’s fate can prompt a government raid, the powerful men who allegedly exploited minors alongside Epstein remain largely untouchable, shielded by wealth, status, or legal loopholes. This juxtaposition paints a compelling picture of a system that prioritizes the enforcement of petty rules over the pursuit of justice for heinous crimes, leaving society to question where true accountability lies.
The influence of corporate money in politics is a pervasive force that often shapes government inaction on issues like genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Companies like Bayer and Monsanto, with their deep pockets and extensive lobbying networks, have the resources to sway policymakers in their favor. They contribute millions to political campaigns, ensuring that elected officials remain sympathetic to their interests. This financial leverage creates a system where legislation or regulation that might harm these corporations’ bottom lines—such as banning or heavily restricting GMOs—is quietly sidelined. The revolving door between government agencies and corporate boardrooms only deepens this entanglement, as former industry executives often take regulatory roles, bringing their biases with them.
Beyond direct political influence, these corporations have mastered the art of shaping public perception through partnerships with universities and media outlets. By funding research at academic institutions, they can produce studies that downplay or dismiss health concerns related to GMOs, lending a veneer of scientific legitimacy to their products. These studies are then amplified by media campaigns, often subtly sponsored or influenced by the same corporations, to reassure the public that GMOs are safe and necessary for feeding a growing population. Dissenting voices—independent researchers or whistleblowers raising red flags about potential health risks—are drowned out or discredited, leaving regulators with a convenient excuse: the “science” isn’t conclusive enough to justify action.
Finally, the government’s inertia can be attributed to a broader economic calculus that prioritizes short-term gains over long-term public health. GMOs are deeply embedded in the agricultural industry, which contributes significantly to GDP and employs millions. Disrupting this system by cracking down on GMO foods would ripple through the economy, threatening jobs, trade relationships, and corporate profits—consequences no administration wants to face. Politicians, wary of being labeled as anti-business or anti-progress, opt for the path of least resistance, allowing these food giants to operate with minimal oversight. Meanwhile, any evidence of harm to human health is buried under bureaucratic delays or dismissed as anecdotal, preserving the status quo where profit trumps precaution.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s leadership at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) promises a transformative shift by prioritizing transparency and rebuilding public trust in a system that many Americans have grown skeptical of, particularly since the COVID-19 pandemic. His commitment to "radical transparency" addresses a core issue: the erosion of confidence in federal health agencies due to perceived corporate influence and opaque decision-making. By vowing to dismantle conflicts of interest—such as the revolving door between regulatory bodies and the pharmaceutical industry—Kennedy aims to ensure that health policies serve the public, not profit-driven corporations. This approach could restore faith in institutions like the CDC and FDA, making them more accountable and responsive to citizens’ needs rather than entrenched interests.
Beyond transparency, Kennedy’s focus on tackling the chronic disease epidemic offers a bold departure from the status quo. He has signaled an intent to investigate previously "taboo" or under-scrutinized contributors to poor health—ultra-processed foods, environmental toxins like glyphosates, and overreliance on pharmaceuticals—through rigorous, unbiased science. This proactive stance contrasts with the reactive, symptom-management model that dominates current healthcare. By shifting HHS’s emphasis toward prevention and root causes, Kennedy could reduce the staggering burden of conditions like obesity, diabetes, and autoimmune disorders, particularly among children, potentially saving billions in healthcare costs and improving quality of life for millions.
Finally, Kennedy’s outsider perspective and willingness to challenge entrenched norms could revitalize an agency often criticized for bureaucratic inertia. His history as an environmental lawyer and advocate demonstrates a tenacity for taking on powerful entities, suggesting he won’t shy away from overhauling outdated systems or questioning long-held assumptions, such as the childhood vaccine schedule’s scope. While his skepticism of certain medical orthodoxies has sparked controversy, his pledge to let science guide policy—coupled with a commission to address chronic disease—offers a chance to modernize HHS. If he succeeds in aligning the agency’s vast resources with a mission to "Make America Healthy Again," Kennedy could turn HHS into a dynamic force for genuine health reform, rather than a caretaker of a broken status quo.