US Politicians and political parties both Democrats and Republicans blame that voting machines are flawed, they can be hacked into and change votes and voting patterns.
They say mail in votes are bad and rigged. A thread 🧵 for awareness.
Voting is all a facade. If elections and voting made any difference, would you seriously think they’d let you vote, elections would be illegal.
Every voting machine is hackable under most circumstances. They say they don’t connect to the internet, but they do. For most machines, it’s easy to get full admin access in under two minutes.
They wouldn’t let us audit elections, audit the pentagon, audit the federal reserve system nor the flow of funds into the ukraine war funding.
IF ELECTIONS MATTERED OR VOTING MADE ANY DIFFERENCE, YOU KNOW THAT’D MAKE THOSE ILLEGAL
There are usually high hopes for people in Democratic nations on the politicians they elect.
What they were promised in elections vs. What they actually achieve after winning elections are quite a contrast.
WHAT YOU GET AFTER IS NOT WHAT YOU WERE PROMISED EARLIER
It’s all one big cartel. Central banks, #BigPharma, weapons manufacturers, corporate media and your governments. Elections are just a facade to make you feel you’re in control of who gets elected, but in fact most of these phony leaders are chosen by and sold to highest bidder.
The last three elections in USA were all rigged and CIA was in the middle of it.
Every country blames another for meddling in their elections.
China - you guys have elections 😂
I don’t always vote, but when I do I make sure I’m from a swing state
ALL prominent DEMOCRATS talked about how dangerous voting machines were before the 2018 elections. They could be hacked, could switch votes, they said.
Now, they blast anyone who questions them.
COMPLAIN ONLY WHEN YOU LOSE. TAKE CREDIT WHEN YOU WIN.
COMPLAIN WHEN YOU LOSE, TAKE ALL THE CREDIT WHEN YOU WIN.
BOTH PARTIES DO THIS EVERY ELECTION CYCLE, NOTHING CHANGES
How to steal an election
New *video evidence* of Maricopa Arizona, USA election officials illegally breaking into sealed election machines after they were tested, reprogramming memory cards, and reinstalling them #ElectionFraud
@KariLake should’ve won easily
81 million votes for Joe Biden, a two time loser presidential candidate with one of the most unpopular VP candidate in modern history.
Joe Biden is a puppet of Obama.
Obama is a #DeepState puppet.
#DeepState runs the show, no matter who wins or loses the elections.
Make mail in ballots illegal in all 50 states
HBO made this documentary after Stacy Abrams 2018 loss in Georgia to prove that voting machines can be hacked. This left leaning documentary proves we can not have free and fair elections using voting machines. #KillChain
Great… you got a sticker for voting
Politicians vs. Voters
The idiots are gonna vote for the uniparty again 🤷♂️
This is what election fraud looks like
If you believe Biden really won the elections without cheating, then you will believe these polls.
If not you already know they’re all fake.
Yes the game is rigged against you
Yes the elections are rigged as well
Rioters then vs. Rioters now
It’s a uniparty supporting the #MilitaryIndustrialComplex #BigPharmaComplex #MediaCensorshipComplex
Tucker Carlson:
“Nobody would say Joe Biden was a great candidate. He didn't campaign. Nobody said I want my kid to grow up to be Joe Biden. So, how did Biden get 81 million votes, 15 million more than Barack Obama?”
Great question… we all know how
Voting to either party is horrible when you have politicians on both sides sold out to corporate interests
You wanna shoot yourself with red bullet or blue bullet, your choice
The real 52% don’t care because they know it’s all a uniparty shit-show
How the heck did Joe Biden get 81 million votes, 15 million more than Barack Obama 🤷♂️
Myth: Voting makes a difference
Reality: Elections are rigged as usual
Elections are what happens when we allow corrupt individuals to rise to positions of power where they feel empowered to commit fraud openly
Though the entire country knows fraud is being committed, half don’t care because THEY THINK it’s in their favor
Just take a wild guess and make it 81 million or something
Keep hiring the wrong people and end up like America… wow that hit a nerve
Vote harder… hope for the better
If I was the #DeepState…
— I would rig the elections
— I would arrest my opposition
— I would control all the media
— I would confuse young people
— would indoctrinate instead of educate
So essentially Ron DeSantis agrees with Democrats more than Republicans
It’s always the uniparty bullshit that gets the bills passed together which benefit them and empower them
Voting machines and ballot scanners are the best things to happen to elections since sliced bread…
Just kidding, elections are plain scams
The probability of mail in ballots being in the correct sequence is 1 in trillions, a lot worse than winning a lottery. But they were in proper sequence in 2000.
IT’S AS IF THEY WERE ALL MANUFACTURED
Poll workers from 2020
- All duplicate ballots were for Democrats
- All challenges were straight refused
- Poll workers changed ballots to democrats with no due process
- Honest poll workers were shutout completely citing COVID restrictions
The election deniers
When they’re not confident Biden is gonna win, when they’re confident they can manipulate mail in ballots
This is what you’ll hear
❌ American media is corrupt
❌ American unions are corrupt
❌ American congress is corrupt
❌ American Wall Street is corrupt
✅ American elections are not corrupt
Make this make sense?
Listen to this Georgia poll watcher who says it’s statistically impossible to get batches of votes completely for Joe Biden
Voting fraud in 2020: Former Trump official Andrew Kloster confirms bombshell 2020 election fraud report out of Muskegon, Michigan
Voting Democrats vs. Republicans
Kamala Harris talking about offline voting machines and paper ballots
You might as well shut the case down
Michigan AG confirms the 8,000-10,000 ballot registrations turned into the Muskegon city clerk by a Democrat operative were *all* fraudulent. They hid this for 3 years and y’all think this is the only incident?
WEF founder Klaus Schwab talks with Google founder Sergey Brin on the possibility of a future without elections.
This is possible since the AI can predict people’s choices with great accuracy.
Politicians always blame the elections are stolen from you when they don’t win
The elections are fair and square when they win the elections though
Elections in 2020 were completely rigged. The absentee ballots were mostly fake. Hear this Democrat bragging about a car full of absentee ballots in Minnesota. He also says the only way you win elections is with money.
If we win elections are fair
If you win elections are rigged
2020 Election fraud runs deep. The USPS subverted American Democracy on Nov. 3, 2020 by backdating over 100,000 ballots for the 2020 Presidential Election.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The acronym "DOGE" "Democrats Officially Getting Exposed." It is used to imply that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk under the administration of President Donald Trump, is revealing or exposing alleged inefficiencies, fraud, and corruption supposedly linked to Democratic policies or government operations they've been in charge of or supported.
🚩Fraudulent Activities Uncovered by DOGE:
1. Improper Payments at the Treasury Department:
- DOGE has claimed that payment approval officers at the Treasury Department were instructed to approve payments indiscriminately, even to known fraudulent or terrorist groups.
2. USAID Operations:
- DOGE has been involved in the shutdown of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), asserting that it is rife with fraud and waste. Specific claims include the agency funding projects like a DEI musical in Ireland and transgender opera in Colombia.
3. Access to Sensitive Government Systems:
- There are reports of DOGE gaining access to sensitive data, including Treasury payment systems, which could involve personal financial information of citizens.
4. Alleged Waste in Federal Spending:
- DOGE has announced savings, such as canceling over $1 billion in federal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) contracts, suggesting these were wasteful or fraudulent expenditures.
5. General Claims of Fraud and Abuse:
- Broad assertions have been made by DOGE about uncovering "massive fraud, abuse, money laundering, and corruption" within government operations, though specifics beyond the above examples are less detailed in public reports.
The global financial system is extraordinarily sensitive to the pronouncements of the Federal Reserve's chief due to the pivotal role the U.S. dollar plays in international trade and finance. As the world's reserve currency, fluctuations in U.S. monetary policy directly influence global liquidity, interest rates, and economic stability. When the Fed chair speaks, whether it's about interest rate decisions, inflation targets, or economic outlooks, markets around the globe adjust in anticipation or reaction. Investors, from Wall Street to the smallest foreign exchange traders, scrutinize every word for hints of policy shifts that could affect asset valuations, currency strength, and investment strategies. This reliance stems from the understanding that changes in U.S. policy can ripple through economies worldwide, affecting everything from commodity prices to international borrowing costs.
This dependency is further amplified by the psychological impact of the Fed's statements. The markets operate on a blend of hard data and human emotion, where confidence or uncertainty can sway economic directions significantly. The Federal Reserve's chief, therefore, not only sets the tone for economic policy but also manages market psychology. A mere suggestion of tightening or easing monetary policy can lead to immediate market movements, as traders and investors adjust their portfolios to hedge against perceived risks or capitalize on new opportunities. This dynamic creates a self-fulfilling prophecy where the Fed's words can shape economic reality by influencing investor behavior, credit availability, and consumer confidence, often before any actual policy changes are enacted.
Moreover, the absence of a truly global monetary authority makes the Federal Reserve's chair one of the most influential figures in international finance. Other central banks and governments watch closely, often aligning their policies to mitigate or leverage the effects of U.S. monetary decisions. This isn't merely about following the dollar; it's about navigating the complex web of global economic interdependence where the U.S. economy, due to its size and influence, acts as a linchpin. The Fed's communication strategy, thus, becomes a critical tool not just for domestic policy but for global financial stability. This concentration of influence underscores a system where one person's words can dictate the financial health and economic direction of nations far beyond U.S. borders, highlighting our world's reliance on the Federal Reserve chief's rhetoric.
Here's why systems dominated by certain sectors might inherently fail to achieve broader societal goals:
🚩A Country Run by Banks Will Always Be in Debt:
- **Profit Over Stability:** Banks inherently aim to maximize profit, which often involves lending money and charging interest. This creates a cycle of perpetual debt for the state, as governments need to borrow to fund operations, infrastructure, and crises. The more debt there is, the more interest accumulates, ensuring that the debt never truly diminishes.
- **Economic Dependency:** By controlling financial policies, banks can dictate economic conditions that favor debt accumulation, like low interest rates that encourage borrowing or high inflation rates that devalue currency, increasing the nominal value of debt.
🚩Healthcare Run by Big Pharma Will Never Cure Disease:
- **Financial Incentives:** Curing diseases is less profitable than managing chronic conditions. Big Pharma benefits from long-term treatments where patients need continuous medication, rather than one-time cures which would eliminate future revenue from that ailment.
- **Research Focus:** The pharmaceutical industry's R&D is heavily influenced by potential market size and profitability rather than public health needs, often sidelining research into cures for less common or less profitable diseases.
- **Regulatory Influence:** Through lobbying, big pharma can influence regulations and drug approval processes to favor treatments that don't eradicate diseases but manage symptoms, thus ensuring sustained sales.
🚩A State Run by War Will Never Know Peace:
- **Perpetual Conflict:** Military-industrial complexes thrive on conflict. Wars justify defense budgets, contracts, and arms sales. Peace reduces these opportunities, hence there's an institutional bias towards maintaining some level of tension or conflict.
- **Political Power:** Military leaders or regimes often gain and retain power through war, making peace less appealing as it might lead to a reduction in their control or influence.
- **Economic Dependency:** Economies can become dependent on war industries for jobs and innovation, creating a cycle where peace is economically destabilizing.
🚩A Nation Run by Media Will Never Know the Truth:
- **Profit from Sensationalism:** Media outlets often prioritize sensational, controversial, or divisive content to attract viewership, which can distort facts or omit context for the sake of engagement.
- **Control Over Information:** Media conglomerates can influence public opinion by controlling what information is disseminated, how it's framed, or even by suppressing stories that don't align with their interests or those of their sponsors.
- **Bias and Agenda Setting:** Whether through political alignment, ownership biases, or advertiser influence, media can skew narratives away from objective truth towards narratives that benefit their agendas or maintain viewer loyalty.
In each case, the systemic incentives and structures prioritize outcomes that align with the dominant institution's interests rather than the public good or societal well-being.
The issue of Muslim grooming gangs in Britain involves groups of men, primarily of Pakistani heritage, who were involved in the systematic sexual exploitation of young, mostly white, girls. These crimes took place over several decades, particularly highlighted in towns like Rotherham, Rochdale, and Telford.
**Nature of the Crimes:**
These gangs would typically target vulnerable young girls, often from disadvantaged backgrounds, using methods such as providing gifts, alcohol, or drugs to manipulate and control them. The abuse included rape, trafficking, and other forms of sexual exploitation, often occurring in a group setting where girls were passed among multiple men for abuse.
**Scale of Impact:**
While exact numbers are difficult to ascertain due to the scale and historical nature of these crimes, various reports suggest:
- In Rotherham alone, an independent inquiry estimated around 1,400 children were sexually exploited between 1997 and 2013. However, some sources suggest that the total number of victims across the UK could reach into the tens of thousands over the span of decades.
- In Telford, one investigation suggested that over 1,000 girls could have been affected over several decades.
**Cover-up Allegations:**
The allegations of cover-ups primarily involve:
- **Police**: Concerns have been raised that the police were reluctant to act due to fears of being perceived as racist or stirring up racial tensions. This hesitation led to insufficient action, with some victims' complaints being dismissed or not taken seriously. There were instances where police officers reportedly did not pursue leads or investigations because they were concerned about community relations or accusations of racial profiling.
- **Labour Party Politicians**: Critics argue that Labour politicians, particularly in areas with significant minority populations, were aware of these crimes but prioritized community cohesion and electoral considerations over addressing the abuse. There have been accusations that local councils, often led by Labour, downplayed or ignored the ethnic dimension of these crimes to avoid accusations of racism, thereby failing the victims.
- **Silence and Inaction**: The term "political correctness" has often been cited as a reason for the silence, where fear of backlash for highlighting the ethnicity of the perpetrators led to systemic failures. This included not only inaction but also in some cases, active suppression of information or downplaying the severity of the incidents.
**Public and Political Response:**
The issue has become politically charged, with debates over the extent to which ethnicity played a role in both the crimes and the cover-up. There has been criticism from various political quarters about the handling of these cases, with calls for more accountability, better policing strategies, and cultural changes within communities to address such issues.
The response from both police and political figures has evolved over time, with more recent commitments to tackle these issues head-on, including the establishment of task forces to investigate grooming gangs. However, the historical mishandling remains a point of contention and has been used in political discourse to critique the approach of past administrations and local governance.