1) User’s Manual to How Democrats Could Try to Make GOPers Sweat Over Santos
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) just blasted GOPers about Rep. George Santos (R-NY).
2) But why wouldn't Democrats try to engineer Santos's ouster from the House? They have the tools to do so.
3) But Jeffries says he has not yet spoken with various members of his caucus who want to expel Santos nor has he had a conversation about it with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA). Jeffries says they’ve been consumed this week because of the debt ceiling talks.
4) However, here are the mechanics:
Any member from either party could introduce a “privileged resolution” to expel Santos. By its nature, the House must consider a privileged resolution immediately or within a two-day window.
5) An expulsion requires a two-thirds vote (290 of 435, if everyone is voting). The House has only expelled five members in its history.
Here’s the gambit if Democrats were try to expel Santos:
6) There are a lot of Republicans who have called for Santos to “resign” or have declared he isn’t fit for office. So a Democratic resolution to expel Santos would put them on the spot. Democrats would likely have all 213 members vote to expel Santos.
7) So Democrats would be putting GOPers on the spot. Either they vote to expel Santos or they stand with him.
If the House gets two-thirds of its members to expel Santos, the deed is done. But even so, Democrats can point to the GOP members who voted against expulsion.
8) That is politically explosive in and of itself. Moreover, Democrats will have created a toxic vote for GOPers if Republicans stand behind Santos and DON’T expel him.
9) Democrats and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) could then weaponize the expulsion roll call vote against vulnerable Republicans from swing districts.
But Republicans could try to dodge the bullet.
10) They could move to table the Democrats’ resolution to expel Santos or move to refer it to the Ethics Committee (the Ethics Committee is already investigating Santos). Those parliamentary moves would be made on the floor.
11) If the House voted to table, the gig is up. Santos remains in the House. If the House votes to send the resolution to committee, that extinguishes it, too. Simple majorities are needed for those roll call votes.
12) Republicans will have avoided a straight up or down vote on Santos’s future. But Democrats could also use those roll call votes against the GOP by saying Republicans can’t even bring themselves to expel Santos.
Democrats can also make mischief for Republicans in another way.
13) Let’s say the House votes to expel Santos. He becomes the sixth member expelled from the House in U.S. history and the first since 2002.
His seat on Long Island is vacant. The governor cannot appoint someone to fill his seat.
14) There must be a special election for fulfill the remainder of Santos’s term. Santos flipped that seat from blue to red in 2022. Democrats believe they have a better than even chance of winning that seat back.
But it’s about the math.
15) If the House expelled Santos, the new breakdown would be 221 Republicans and 213 Democrats. There are 434 members. 218 is the magic number to pass anything. So McCarthy’s margin slips from four votes to three.
16) Moreover, if Democrats were to win a hypothetical special election in Santos’s district, the breakdown would be 221 Democrats and 214 Democrats with 435 members. The magic number to pass a bill is still 218. But McCarthy can still only lose three votes.
17) So, it’s unclear why Democrats won’t execute this gambit to expel Santos. Or, at the very least, make Republicans sweat and give them headaches.
18) One senior House source suggested to Fox that, ironically, BOTH SIDES NEED SANTOS around potentially to vote on a debt ceiling deal to avoid a default.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) Schumer on Tuberville's remarks about white nationalists in the military: Revolting. Utterly revolting. Does Senator Tuberville honestly believe that our military is stronger with white nationalists in its ranks?
2) Schumer: I cannot believe this needs to be said, but white nationalism has no place in our armed forces and no place in any corner of American society. Period. Full stop. End of story. I urge Senator Tuberville to think about the destructive spectacle he is creating
3) Schumer: His actions are dangerous. His words are gravely damaging. And his refusal to think about the consequences of his actions on our military personnel and families is a stain on this Chamber.
1) Top Dem on Oversight Cmte Raskin on GOP probe of Biden family: I haven't seen anything that touches President Biden. There's obviously a lot about Hunter Biden and allegations about other members of the family but I haven't seen him connects to President Biden.
2) Raskin: And these the SARS reports, which they're calling bank records or bank documents are unverified uncorroborated tips that are sent in saying that there might be suspicious activity but 96% of them never lead to any investigation
3) Raskin: They're also supposed to be completely confidential. So, you know, I think we should try and respect that but I understand the nature of the game here. I just don't think they've laid a glove on President Biden
1) The Hitchhiker’s Guide to What the Indictment Means for GOP NY Rep Santos and Could He Be Expelled
There are calls for House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) to expel Rep. George Santos (R-NY) after a his indictment.
2) It’s not up to the Speaker. But for now, expulsion is unlikely.
The reason? Santos has only been indicted, not convicted. Moreover, the House and Senate have only expelled a grand total of 20 members since the beginning of the republic. Five of those were House members.
3) Many expulsions stemmed from lawmakers siding with the Confederacy during the Civil War.
Here are the mechanics of a potential expulsion. And for starters, it’s a high bar. That’s why expulsion is so rare.
1) House Republicans hoped to pass a border security bill in the winter. But they lacked the votes.
Title 42 ends this week. That leaves House Republicans scrambling to adjust a border bill so it will pass Thursday when Title 42 expires.
But they don’t hsge the votes yet.
2) The House Rules Committee filed a “rule” establishing the parameters of debate on the bill after 1 am et today. But it’s possible they update the rule with changes to appease conservatives about E-Verify and a host of other concerns.
3) If the House can’t approve the rule, they can’t put the bill on the floor.
Fox is told Republicans will hash out prospective changes at the conference meeting this morning.
A) Top Dem on Armed Svcs Cmte Smith on Fox: China should return phone calls and be willing to meet with us..Secretary Austin..has been trying to meet with his counterpart, the Chinese defense minister, for months. They refused to do that.
B) Smith: I think China's taking a very aggressive approach. They feel like they are the rising power and they can sort of bully their way through the world, which is why it is important that we build partnerships and alliances to have a deterrence to that.
C) Smith: I don't disagree that we ought to be able to get along with China in the world. But it's got to be based on a mutual idea of what the rules are and at least at a minimum, having conversations. They refuse to have arms control discussions.