In discussing the upcoming Ukrainian offensive yesterday with a group of govt officials, one asked me “when will it start?”
I said: “in the attack, it starts when the commander feels it’s the right time…that’s an advantages of the offensive.”
I then explained RSOI. 1/10
RSOI is Reception, Staging, Onward Movement & Integration.
When units enter a combat zone, they are “received” in country, “staged” to move forward, then “moved” to the combat area, and then integrated into a larger unit.
How is this related to Ukraine, you ask? 2/
Remember that Ukraine’s army has been receiving all kinds of different equipment from many different countries, and they are training at different EU training areas on new skills with that equipment.
Some training takes longer than other, depending on the kit. 3/
When finished in, say, Germany, Poland, Estonia or other countries, they travel back to Ukraine & are “received” & “staged” with other types of partner units.
Once all together, they “move” forward, closer to the front lines, & are “integrated” into even larger units. 4/
Now, multiply this by the estimated 9 Brigades - armor, engineers, artillery, logistics, staff & commanders, etc. (many of whom are coming together for the first time) - and it’s easy to understand why…it takes as long as it takes.
Commanders assess when they’re ready. 5/
I once heard a Sergeant Major say “RSOI is converting piles of puzzle pieces into combat ready units.”
Spot on.
BTW, these “puzzle pieces” are being put together all across the 400+ km front lines, at points of Ukrainian general’s plan. 6/
A few days ago, Czech President Pavel publicly told Zelenskyy “don’t be pushed, attack when you’re ready.”
I’m sure others have said the same to Gen Zaluzhnyi, chief of Ukraine’s Army.
A mentor once told me (as I prepared a division for combat) “go slow to go fast!” 7/
Ukraine’s army will attack when they’re ready, at time and place(s) of their choosing, & they will be successful in their operation to regain sovereign territory, transitioning to offense takes significant preparation, coordination & synchronization.
This ain’t a video game. 8/
In 2007, I had the honor of commanding the Germany-based @1stArmoredDiv.
We were the first “plug & play” division…we deployed with our division staff but all our combat brigades came from 7 different divisions in the US & our support units came from 13 different states. 9/
Each unit’s RSOI execution during this “surge” was critical to getting forces into the fight.
This execution is what the Ukrainian Army is doing now.
Those wanting the offensive to start need to be patient.
It will go slow, then it will go fast. 10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I believe Ukraines’ upcoming offensive operation will achieve huge tactical and perhaps large operational success.
But for those who believe it will be represented by large arrows on maps, that will not be indicative of this phase. 1/
This will be a tough fight, with newly-formed Ukrainian units conducting (for the first time) large-scale combined arms breeches against prepared Russian defensive positions.
This will be a new phase of the campaign that will be very different. 2/
My belief is that Ukraines’ forces will perform well (even better than before) & the Russian force will continue to perform poorly (though not as bad as they have in the past).
That is partly due to switching roles (attacking vs defending, and time spent by each preparing). 3/
Last night, I tweeted that I had been assessing & considering the challenges Ukraine's Army (UA) Commanders were facing in preparing for the “spring offensives.
I said I'd share some thoughts on what I would be thinking if I were among them.
This is that 🧵 1/
First, there were people who thanked me for this, but There were dozens who said "don't give secrets to the Russians!"
Trust me, this 🧵: 1. Will not help RU 2. May help civilians better understand & manage expectation 3. Is based on what most militaries already know. 2/
Oh...one guy responded "do it, but don't make it too long."
To that guy I would say "this is it...deal with the length and try to stay focused!" 3/
Woke up early to Putin's "State of the Russian Federation" remarks. It's mostly being reported due to his comments about him deciding to end the New Start Treaty agreements.
While that was significant, there was MUCH more. 1/
Putin "vowed" to "systemically" continue the offensive in Ukraine.
As I said in this @washingtonpost piece published yesterday, Putin's military has failed, in all 5 phases of this war, in achieving his strategic objectives. 2/ wapo.st/3YRnCcs.
Putin was bold enough to say:
"Ukraine is not just a neighboring country. It is an inalienable part of our own history, culture & spiritual space. These are our comrades, those dearest to us."
There are various estimates of how many "soldiers" (& criminals) RU has mobilized & sent to the front. I'd guess it's equal to or slightly greater than the initial invasion force (190K).
But as I've said many times, these are untrained forces. 3/
The @GOP is debating on condemning @potus actions on the China Balloon at the SOTU. If they do condemn, after the gang of eight and then other members it will only show how unserious they are about national security.
As I said on Friday, as a former Cavalryman I learned that unless there is an immediate threat, a smart person spends time observing, reporting, and analyzing.
While the immediate reaction may be "shoot it down," experts may provide a more prudent approach.
That happened. 2/
We'll learn @NORADCommand tracked across the Bering Sea, Aleutians, Alaska & then Canada.
Based on experience, there was constant tracking, as has been reported, and immediate risk mitigation (jamming, spoofing, following).