In today's #vatniksoup, I'll introduce a Danish "citizen journalist" and propagandist, Jesper Larsen (@JesperL01). He's best-known for his pro-Russian fake news blog, ipressen, and for his battle against East StratCom and @EUvsDisinfo.
1/22
Jesper's main target has been an organization called East StratCom, which he calls a "system of censorship". He states that in addition to "political funding", East Stratcom also has external funding coming from George Soros and intelligence services.
2/22
What East StratCom actually does is a lot of research on information operations and disinformation, so defaming it is naturally a high priority for any pro-Kremlin propagandist. The most famous project of East StratCom is the debunking website, EU vs. Disinfo.
3/22
In 2017, Larsen authored a critical report on East StratCom and sent it to Danish pro-Kremlin politician and former defence attaché in Moscow, Marie Krarup. Krarup and her comments have appeared on many occasions on Russian state-controlled media channel, Sputnik.
4/22
Larsen has dedicated a total of 11 blog posts on ipressen to defaming East StratCom, but fortunately these efforts have been in vain. He's also attacked European Values Center for Security Policy, an NGO directed by @_JakubJanda.
5/22
In a 2017 interview, Larsen said that he's made three tips to Crimea, two to Donbas and once to Kyiv to "see what is really happening". According to Jesper, these trips were self-financed. During his trips, he visited the Russia-sponsored separatists, allegedly celebrated...
6/22
with them and visited their military base, which he called "impressive". He also appeared on a local propaganda TV station called "Novorossiya TV". In the interview, he praises the "Donbas separatists" for their "high level of discipline" and for keeping the streets and...
7/22
...alleys of Donetsk clean. Jesper has claimed that he has never received any money from Russia or from pro-Russia media, but that he'd gladly accept payments to "cover my costs".
8/22
Larsen likes to frame absolutely everything as "Russophobia". One example of this is Bill Browder & the "Russophobic" Magnitsky Act. In 2005, Browder was blacklisted over made-up charges by the Russian authorities and his company assets were seized by the Russian government.
9/22
In 2009, Browder's lawyer Sergei Magnitsky died due inadequate medical treatment. After this, Browder started promoting for the Magnitsky Act (and its variants), an international law that would allow officials to sanction individuals for their crimes.
10/22
Larsen has also questioned the down shooting of MH17 by two Russians (including Igor Girkin) and one Ukrainian, parroting the RT narrative that the missile that took down the plane was actually under Ukrainian control (it was not).
11/22
In Oct 2017, Finnish super-vatnik Johan Bäckman interviewed Jesper Larsen in Helsinki, Finland. Most of the interview focuses on the "fake news" reported by the mainstream media in Europe and in the Nordics. Ironically, the video where these two claim that "there is no...
12/22
...free speech" In Europe, are the most productive spreaders of non-censored pro-Russian propaganda in the Nordics. He also attended a "International Expert Conference" called "Hybrid Threats, Nordic States & The Future of Donbass". The event was again organized by Bäckman.
13/22
In 2018, Larsen published a post titled "Toxic lies about Douma", in which he suggested that the video which showed the children victims of a chemical attack was fake, and that it was used to justify "NATO bombing" in Syria.
14/22
In the same article, he also cast doubts on the White Helmets, an NGO group providing humanitarian aid in Syria.
During the same year, Larsen also did an interview with Aleksandr Dugin, which I unfortunately couldn't find from these very 90's style website.
15/22
During 2022, Jesper was also active on Twitter. Some of his topics include the fake referendums, Zelensky's "cocaine addiction", Croatia blocking Finland's and Sweden's NATO membership, and "genocide in Donbas".
16/22
In Feb 2023, Larsen was broadcasting from a Danish "antiwar" demonstration called "The war is more than blue and yellow". The event featured a handful people, and it contained "songs and speeches against arms donations to Ukraine".
17/22
In Apr 2023, Larsen appeared on Bäckman's show with the title "Nordic Experts: Russian Victory in Ukraine leads to Ukronazified NATO", where he appeared alongside with prominent intellectuals, including Swedish Agneta Norberg and a guy from Norway called "Bjorn".
18/22
In this panel, the gang suggested that the news coming out from Nordic public broadcasting companies is no longer just propaganda, but "warporn". The main topic of discussion is a recently published, joint-effort documentary by Nordic public broadcasting companies ...
19/22
...called "The Shadow War". This documentary focuses on Kremlin's espionage efforts against Nordic wind farms, oil platforms, and undersea cables.
20/22
Fortunately, the Nordic countries have become quite resilient to Kremlin narratives, and most of the Nordic propagandists are now in a very tiny marginal, where Larsen also resides.
21/22
Nevertheless, he's still active in the Danish and Nordic scene, broadcasting pro-Russian demonstrations and participating in various podcasts. I'm sure we will see more of him in @johanbek's "Z-streams", where they call for "less Russophobic" news coverage.
In this 8th Debunk of the Day, we’ll discuss complaints about US financing of NATO, in particular how the US allegedly pays for European defense, leading to calls for a US withdrawal from the Alliance — which would only make it easier for Putin to invade more countries.
1/7
NATO by itself costs peanuts. In fact, the core of NATO is a principle, an agreement, that ideally costs nothing. The main cost is defense spending, which the US is eagerly doing anyway: Trump has just announced a 50% increase in military spending for his “Department of War”. 2/7
To sow division and thereby weaken the Alliance, vatniks deliberately mix up different figures, such as contributions to the NATO common budget, with defense spending. And US military spending has been huge by the sheer fact that the US is the world’s largest economy.
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we’ll talk about why we’re doing this: why we think Ukraine is so important and why we believe that souping vatniks and debunking their propaganda narratives is so crucial to counter Russia’s & their allies’ wars of aggression and achieve real peace.
1/20
War is expensive, and Russia is not a rich country that could afford this: Hospitals? Roads? Plumbing? No: everything into terror and destruction.
But not only that. There is a 2nd item in the Russian state budget that remains strong no matter what:
Manufacturing support for that terror and destruction. Propaganda. Vatniks. “Innocent” travel bloggers. “Independent” journalists. “Patriotic” politicians. Russia spends hundreds of billions of rubles a year ($5 billion) on this, and that kind of money buys you A LOT of BS.
In this second (and possibly last) Basiji Soup, we’ll explore how the Islamic Republic of Iran has prepared for a conflict with the US and Israel. We won’t cover the military aspects, but another kind of war — information warfare.
1/20
In the 1st Basiji Soup, we souped the Islamic Republic, its disinformation operations, its hypocrisy, its support of terrorism including Russia’s, its (one-sided?) relationship with Putin, and the mass protests against it that started two months ago:
The Internet blackout has been crucial in allowing the regime to cover up its massacre of the protesters and especially the scope of it, making it difficult to assess the number of victims. They went to great lengths to jam Starlink, after having made its use illegal.
In this 7th Debunk of the Day, we’ll expose the “Chickenhawk” fallacy. The chickenhawk accusation or the “go to the front!” imperative is a dishonest attempt to silence anyone supporting Ukraine by pushing them to go fight. A barely hidden death wish, as it’s always uttered… 1/5
…with zero regard for who you are or what your personal circumstances might be — you could already be there, on your way there, a veteran, or unable to fight. More broadly, not everyone can or should be a soldier, just as not everyone can or should be a policeman or a nurse. 2/5
Yet a society still needs those things to be done, and the fact that not everyone can go to medical school or fight crime does not mean that we have to surrender to invaders and criminals, nor that we cannot all have an opinion on healthcare. 3/5
In this 6th Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about a complex and controversial topic: conscription. It is used by vatniks to attack Ukraine for drafting men to fight, while conveniently ignoring the alternative, including the horrors of conscription into the Russian army. 1/8
Military obligations are a reality in many countries, from the most peaceful democracies to the most tyrannical dictatorships — unless you have “bone spurs”. Some argue it is a necessity for defense against invading armies, especially for small countries. 2/8
Others point out that it goes against individual rights or that a professional army is better. And Zelenskyy might agree: he did in fact end conscription. But then a full-scale invasion happened: exactly why many nations, including the US, still keep some form of draft. 3/8
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we’ll introduce the International Olympic Committee (IOC) @Olympics . It’s mostly known for organizing sporting events, and for being supposed to foster the Olympic ideal while actually submitting to dictators.
1/15
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) was founded in 1894 in Paris by Pierre de Coubertin with a noble goal: promote peace through sports. Politics out, sportsmanship in: sounds great in theory.
2/15
But in practice, the IOC has a long history of accommodating authoritarian regimes, always in the name of “neutrality,” “dialogue,” and “keeping sports separate from politics”, usually not in a particularly consistent or moral way.