This is the body of the Kurdish toddler Alan Shenu. His image appeared everywhere to drive sympathy for Merkel's 2015 mass migration catastrophe.
What was unreported: Shenu's family had already settled in Turkey; they were by no understanding of the term "refugees" anymore.
From his totally secure location in Turkey, where he also had employment, Shenu's father tried to secure passage to Canada, but failed because of incomplete paperwork. Then he booked passage with smugglers on a raft to Kos (Greece), and his son died when the raft capsized.
Somehow all of this was made to be, first, Germany's fault; and then, Canada's fault, although any German or Canadian whose son died in similar circumstances would probably have all their other kids taken away from them and face criminal charges.
Of course, none of it was Turkey's fault, although the photograph was taken on a Turkish beach. Also too, it was Turkish authorities who failed to stop the migrant smugglers before the fact, and did very little aside from some pro forma arrests to stop it after the fact.
The moral of this story, is that everything you ever hear in any media or press source about migrants, anywhere, in any connection, is a total top-to-bottom egregious fucking misrepresentation. It is all a pack of lies.
The only thing that is not a lie, is their presence here.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Can't fully agree here.
In the early 2020, the elite-supported "covid narrative" downplayed SARS-2 risk. It wasn't until the Italian lockdown that the Great Narrative Reversal happened, with the bulk of elites & the right switching sides.
Drosten (of PCR notoriety) said it would be for most people "a mild cold" in the first days of March; Fauci co-authored a statement in NEJM (published late March, written I think in Feb.) which suggested the risk might be comparable to influenza.
Were some elite-adjacent morons like Fingle Dingle shitting their pants from January? Yes. And were some important right-wing figures counter-signalling the risk from the beginning? Also yes. But the dynamics of the discourse were totally inverted –
1) Adam Lanza has clearly just read New York Magazine, 'Travis the Menace', published Jan. 2011 – the definitive investigative piece on the incident. He mentions many details that are exclusive to this article.
2) Lanza finds episode intriguing b/c he's blank-slate environmentalist. He believes we're born as chimps & our parents shape us. Thus, Travis's attack arises from his upbringing, and Lanza is very impatient with the standard 'well chimps are wild face-eating animool bro' line.
Am reluctant to tweet this but I will anyway, b/c why be anon on internet otherwise:
Wat it mean, how it feel, if you are hyperneuroatypical autiste freak and you're fed blank slate bullshit ("you're a product of your environment") since age 5.
Sometimes I think about Travis, who was shot to death by a Stamford police officer on 16 February 2009, after attacking and apparently eating the hands and face off of Charla Nash, a local woman who was friends with and employed by his owner, Sandra Herold. He was 13.
It was widely reported that Travis was famous for media and advertising appearances, but this seems untrue. Many of his alleged prodigious abilities to drive cars, surf the internet, etc., also seemed to be unsubstantiated and based in local reporting.
Travis was a minor celebrity in Stamford and the locals seemed to have exaggerated his abilities and importance. His parents were a retired zoo chimpanzee named Suzy, and Coco, who had been kidnapped from Africa apparently for purposes of breeding.
The ideal tweet thread is a series of self-contained statements that advance a central argument, one after the other.
It’s hard to meet this ideal, but when done well, a thread allows readers to interact separately with every statement.
Threads are also systematically favoured by the algorithm, as each subsequent tweet re-promotes the whole thread and increases its exposure on followers’ timelines.
It’s a unique genre, which focusses the author’s and the reader’s attention on every individual sub-argument.
Long tweets otoyh are just crippled blog posts. Ify Musk’s goal is adding substack functionality, then long tweets should display as article link w/ image card. When clicked, these would open a separate blog-style post with .html formatting, maybe even their own comment section.
Often in response to my antiliberal commentary, I hear that our current system in fact offers unprecedented freedoms & circumscribes the arbitrary depredations of the powerful - the whole liberal book of hymns.
I beg you to realise that none of this is actually true.
The whole trick of liberal democratic systems, is to promise all manner of autonomy and freedoms, and then to sneak the old abhorred tyrannies in through the back door - most recently, under such banners as those of positive rights, health and safety.
Power camouflaged as hygiene & security & the popular will is much worse than naked power by itself, for being so much harder to oppose. Likewise, a crypto-aristocracy masquerading as public servants will extract and tyrannise while half of everyone defends their depredations.
While the world's foremost steelmänner invent faek & ghey polemical constructs like ThE SafE UnCErTainTy FaLLaCy, let's contemplate how you fuck up & shit the bed over a ret@rd fairy tale like AI Risk.
We'll call it the Artificially Restricted Possibilities Fallacy.
A long time ago, people like Bostrom and Fat Yud were peddling pseudoconundra like Pascal's Mugging, which are basically scenarios where some creep demands that you give him 5 Euro, or he's going to do five billion Holoc ... Holodmores ... in a parallel universe.
Nao replace "5 billion" with "number greater than all atoms in universe." Assume almost any nonzero probability that your mugger is lying, assign nontrivial value to single human life, suddenly you need to be giving 5 euro to every freak who stops you in underground.