“Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity” is a terrific new book by @DAcemogluMIT & @baselinescene
Now, I have an idea!
Read the book, share your questions, & let’s collectively grill Daron Acemoglu in my podcast next month! #bookclub 🔥
In my opinion, this is the best book @DAcemogluMIT has written because it really engages with culture, eg on how
- churches legitimised medieval exploitation
- white Americans normalised Jim Crow
- the power of charisma, and how
- we can rethink our vision of technology
@DAcemogluMIT & @baselinescene argue that the direction of progress depends on society’s ‘vision’: how should society be organised? what’s acceptable?
‘Vision’ is thus an ideological battle of persuasion.
This emphasis on ‘vision’ is very different from Why Nations Fail and The Narrow Corridor
- which largely implied that each group wants to advance their self-interest and they’re more able to do so if they’re strong and unified.
Inequalities may go unquestioned.
@DAcemogluMIT & @baselinescene argue that rich people command higher status, which makes them more persuasive.
That ideological power is reinforced by institutions, which entrench elite wealth.
So our vision remains influenced by rich elites.
Let me give the example of Trump:
Some people venerate wealth & perceive him as a great businessman. This heightens his ideological power.
As DA & SJ argue, as more people listen, he gains status & success.
In Alabama, white people referred to him as ‘our president’.
Economics is another example
@DAcemogluMIT & @baselinescene argue how the reverence for Economists like Milton Friedman and the Chicago school strengthened their ideological power & social influence.
Likewise (almost) everyone bought the line that “banks must be bailed out”.
Ideological persuasion is not only vested in charismatic leaders and thinkers but also popular culture.
The film “Birth of a Nation” fostered racist stereotypes and increased hate crimes across the US aeaweb.org/articles?id=10…
So culture is not set in stone.
It is malleable
Having made the case for charisma & ideological persuasion, @DAcemogluMIT & @baselinescene argue that technology *can* be redirected.
People could be convinced to rethink the social bias of technology & demand that it is regulated in ways that promote productivity & prosperity.
Are they right??
Tbh, I think it’s an upward struggle.
Google is already using AI to enhance its corporate power - argues @parismarx.
By scraping together answers from around the web, Google keeps users on its page and monopolises advertising revenue. disconnect.blog/p/google-wants…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) There’s mounting evidence that religiosity promotes social cooperation.
This is consistent with earlier work suggesting a co-evolutionary process between the axial age, belief in supernatural punishment and growing socioeconomic complexity.
2) The authors make a very nice point that gods might be called upon to enforce social cooperation where secular alternatives are inadequate.
Distrust in states and markets may motivate religiosity.
Technology leapfrogging is regarded as a win in economic development.
But is the same true for culture?
If one group grows up patriarchal & expects deference while another rapidly changes, this may trigger backlash.
Let me illustrate with France, Spain, & Latin America
🧶
People develop their gender ideologies by observing their families and local communities.
Once forged, these gender stereotypes are hard to dislodge.
Confirmation bias means that we tend to ignore disconfirming information.
Social change thus occurs one funeral at a time.
For this reason, sons of working mothers are much more likely to have working wives.
Boys see the benefits first-hand, they regard it as normal, and they probably know how to cook for themselves. They’re less likely to expect female servitude.