Adil Ghaffar Profile picture
May 13 5 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Entire #PDM and Pakistan’s political leaders including #PPP, #PMLN, and their workers are blaming @PTIofficial and @ImranKhanPTI for the retaliation & aggression by workers, shown on 9th May, 2023.
They have also opened fire against the #judiciary for the greetings offered to @ImranKhanPTI
during his appearance in #Supreme_Court_Of_Pakistan.
This thread is to analyse seriousness in allegations.
In both the instances, learned leaders & their supporters are missing the main & core issue that @ImranKhanPTI was KIDNAPPED AND NOT ARRESTED, therefore, aggression/retaliation was against illegal detention & kidnapping & not against the arrest, had it was legally permissible.
Please be informed that this tweet does not favour the destruction caused during retaliation/aggression.

The greetings offered by #judiciary was a result of immediate reaction of abduction and based on presumption of innocence, a legal principle

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adil Ghaffar

Adil Ghaffar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AdilGhaffar18

Jul 3, 2022
@MiftahIsmail you have not only ruined your political career but have also tarnished & spoiled the political reputation of #PMLN.

Please be informed that the word "Regime Changers" (RC) used herein below includes all 11 political parties that formed #PDM
1/10
Including those who either, directly or indirectly, locally or internationally, were involved.

You miscalculated and was under the self-assumed impression that RC will eventually come to rescue you and #PMLN.
2/10
After assuming charge as Finance Minister on 19-4-22 you made several attempts with #IMF but failed to observe the seriousness and heat. You were under the impression that multilateral agency will be dominated by RC.
3/10
Read 10 tweets
Jul 2, 2022
Let's change our life style to fight against inflation.

1. If you're dining out 4 times a month reduce it to 2 or 3 times;
2. Restrict movement in cars for single purpose, organise usage & than allow one car;
1/6
3. Restrict electricity usage between 6.30 to 10.30 ideal time for family reunion in one room;

4. Keep an eye on gas usage, you will be surprised in your July'22 bill;

2/6
5. DO NOT, & I repeat DO NOT, spend on things you don't want, if you like some new innovation, spend some time asking yourself "do I really want & can't I live without it"

6. Restrict your purchases from luxuries to essential, small things matters like soap, shampoo, creams
3/6
Read 6 tweets
Jun 27, 2022

Strongly Disagree!! None of the rationale provided make any sense. I will respond to all your tweets in chronological manner.
1. "On Affluent people"
Please remember creation of wealth after paying taxes is not a crime. 1/19
You cannot penalise people who have created wealth after payment of all taxes.
These Affluent people are the ones who have taken not only business risk but also country risk and chose Pakistan to invest their hard earned tax paid income. 2/19
All the positive numbers in either manufacturing, Agriculture and/or Service sector are due to the investments made by these Affluent people, therefore these Affluent people are directly related to the economic development of Pakistan. 3/19
Read 20 tweets
Jun 25, 2022
Keeping in view my passion on taxation, a friend sent me the following article written by @ZehraFarooq. I am not her follower neither she is and this evaluation is not for the sake of criticism but for learning.

threadreaderapp.com/thread/1540430…
In our country people blindly follow and forward articles without even reading it give it a second thought.
There are many mistake in this article.
Through this article she has tried to evolve "Tax incidence of Corporates"
Firstly, though she emphasis on the importance of data yet failed to share the source of data.
Secondly, in 2nd para, she mentioned "roughly 44,000" and we know results cannot be based on approximately or roughly while analysing data.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(