Here's a graph where cardiac and covid deaths are included in the same death rate (per 100,000 maternities).
The rate dropped markedly in 2018-2020 and was slightly higher from 2019-2021 but was comparable to 2014-2016.
In the meantime there was a massive rise in suicides of pregnant women which appears to be a 2020 phenomenon and a rise in thrombosis deaths.
There was also a rise in deaths from (pre)eclampsia and pregnancy related sepsis.
Looking at the period 2018-2021 and comparing to 2014-2017 we see the following excess maternal deaths. Cardiac and covid were grouped for this analysis.
These look more like policy induced deaths than covid deaths to me.
Access to healthcare saves lives.
If I was as pro-vax as possible then you could claim that the 2019-2021 saw 6 more deaths from cardiac and covid combined than the 2014-2017 average.
If we assume
a) they were all due to covid
b) they were all in the unvaccinated
c) that someone had invented a miraculous Vx that could have prevented all of those deaths
then vaccinating 2,066,997 mums in that period would have given an absolute risk reduction for the miracle of 0.0000029%
or 1 life saved per 340,000
N.B. There is no data by year which makes interpretation slightly challenging.
There is also no indication of how many women had more than one cause of death included in the data.
Someone has pointed out that the figures for cardiac deaths look like a repetition of the row above.
I do not know if there was an error in this report. @NPEU_UKOSS will know.
I have recalculated based on subtracting other causes from total.
Still big misclassification of cardiac death in 2018-2020.
With this corrected data, including all cardiac and covid deaths together, there was an excess of 31 deaths = 0.000015% of maternities.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
All the vaccines ever did was make people immune suppressed for two weeks.
The consequence was that those who were susceptible to a particular variant had their infections earlier than they would have.
You can measure after that point and get an illusion of benefit.
This trick only works if you vaccinate during a wave.
For the UK - we were fast getting to those most susceptible to dying. Our death wave looks like a witch's hat on top of Europe's because of the earlier infections.
The last 4 years has been a period of modelling based on assumptions laundered through the medical literature and called "The Science".
If you thought the "real world" evidence was more reliable think again. 🧵
@Jikkyleaks has exposed a massive fraud at the heart of the covid literature.
Instead of using the difficult, fragmented and hard to collate data from the actual real world, pharma sponsored datasets which contain modelled synthetic data were used.
Like all models this synthetic data will have been based on prior assumptions:
assumptions like vaccines preventing 96% of infections.
The consequent results stand out ludicrous disprovable claims.