Did you know that Brighton also have an out-of-possession phase beside the build-up phase? Jokes aside, quick thread to analyze the quite interesting De Zerbi's OOP strategy against Arsenal.
It was a very interesting match-up between two teams that master both build-up and pressing. Basically a chess match between De Zerbi and Arteta.
Arsenal (4-3-3): 4+1 build-up with wide FB, Jorginho as the DM. Odegaard and Xhaka would drop deep on the ball side to offer a pass line (sometimes side by side with Jorginho and forming a 4+2).
Brighton's approach was very aggressive and brave with man-to-man marking leaving only 3 players back.
Ferguson (ST) on Gabriel (LCB)
McAllister (AM) on Kiwior (RCB)
Gilmour (LDM) on Jorginho (DM)
Wingers on FBs
Gross (RDM) on Xhaka (LCM)
Colwill (LCB) on Odegaard (RCM)
What catches the eye the most is certainly what De Zerbi asked to Colwill, the LCB, who had to follow Odegaard man-to-man everywhere, even when the Norwegian was replacing Jorginho in the DM position or even as as the CB in a temporary back three.
It's a very risky choice because it effectively leaves a constant 3vs3 at the back, but De Zerbi's idea is to press high and contain Arsenal's build-up to the point where it is extremely difficult to find Saka, Jesus or Trossard.
One thing I found interesting was the narrowness of the pressure. A possible drawback to this is the freedom the FBs enjoyed, but Mitoma and Enciso were very able in running wide straight away to press them by exploiting the touchline as an extra man (also helped by the FBs).
I wanna conclude with three videos that I find very illustrative.
The 1st concerns a standard Arsenal right-sided pressure situation that forces Arteta's team into a long ball.
The 2nd is an example of Brighton's pressing on the left-side, with Gross at first pressing Xhaka forcing him to play it back to Kiwior. He then runs at Kiriow overshadowing Xhaka, forcing Arsenal wide where they almost win the ball back.
The last one is my favourite because it perfectly illustrates the hunger with which the Brighton players want to recover the ball. The action starts as a free kick and turns into a ruthless hunt for the ball, everyone chasing their man everywhere.
Il Milan è tornato indietro di un anno: 4-2-3-1 super aggressivo. L'idea era di bloccare sul nascere il dominio del centrocampo del Napoli che passa per i piedi di Lobotka. Bennacer a uomo su di lui ha avuto l'abnegazione e l'agilità di piedi necessaria a limitarlo.
Bruno Giorgi, storico allenatore del Cagliari, diceva che chi vince i duelli vince la partita. Il trio di centrocampo del Napoli ha vinto 5 duelli su 21. Tonali impressionante con 7 duelli vinti su 8.
Mitoma's goal stems from building up from the back even if it doesn't seem so. The whole idea behind building up from the back consists in attracting opposition's pressure to then find space behind pressure lines to attack, as happened here.
Brighton better than many other teams exemplify this concept by bringing many players into their own half of the pitch (if not into their own area) to attract pressure, break it with their passing technique and patterns to then attack with space.
Brentford (5-3-2) defended like this:
STs on CBs
LWB on RB
LCM and CM on CMs
RCM on LB
Brighton moves Mac Allister deeper and Welbeck wide to take out Brentford's CCB and RCB, creating a HUGE space between LCB and RWB perfectly exploited by Steele's pass and Mitoma's movement.
[THREAD] Tactical Analysis of Barcelona - Manchester United
Frantic and chaotic match in which individual mistakes have been decisive. Let's delve into the tactical aspects of the game.
I'll mainly focus on Barcelona, but it'd be impossible to ignore the gameplan of Man United.
Both managers opted for rather surprising choices. Ten Hag proposed a sort of 4-3-3 with Fred and Weghorst as #8 and Rashford central. From that position the Dutch had a central role out of possession and helped with aerial duels and layoffs, Rashford was a threat in-behind.
Xavi biggest surprise was starting Marcos Alonso instead of Christensen (one of the best player of Barça in this season). In addition, Koundé and Araújo switched position (the former CB, the latter RB), and Alba plays at LB instead of Balde.
Cautious approach:
- Narrow 4231
- Do not concede numerical superiority centrally
- Be ready to double up on wingers with Saka/Martinelli
Aggressive approach:
- Man-marking
- Zinchenko tucked in for 4vs4
- Martinelli/Saka covershadowing wingers
Partey and Jorginho in could severely undermine the effectiveness of the second approach though
I placed the ball centrally and in Dias's possession to give an overall idea of the movements on both flanks. Naturally, depending on the area of the pitch where the ball is, the movements and the markings should vary.
Una soluzione che vorrei vedere nei prossimi mesi: 1. Modulo base 2. Modulo in possesso 3. Modulo in non possesso
Preferirei Rog a Viola per mille motivi, ma per la struttura che si crea in fase di non possesso credo sia meglio Viola. Alternativa: Rog al posto di Mancosu.
Io credo che questa squadra abbia alcuni problemi di complementarità: come terzini sinistri abbiamo Barreca (o Carboni) che sanno dare ampiezza e spinta sulla fascia, e come esterni sinistri di fatto solo Mancosu che però viene dentro al campo.
A destra abbiamo solo terzini di spinta, ma come esterno abbiamo Nández che è l'opposto di Mancosu essendo un giocatore di spinta e che sa dare ampiezza. In parole povere: per trovare delle spaziature adatte dovremmo avere un terzino destro difensivo, per quello Capradossi là.
Analisi tattica di Ternana - Cagliari (o del perché il Cagliari non è riuscito a segnare)
Nell'analisi di oggi andrò dritto al particolare concentrandomi esclusivamente sul perché il Cagliari non è riuscito a trovare il gol ieri.
Non c'è molto da analizzare per quanto riguarda le altre fasi. La Ternana è passata in vantaggio subito e si è chiusa comprensibilmente nella propria metà campo lasciandoci totalmente il pallino del gioco. Non c'è pertanto molto da analizzare dal punto di vista della costruzione.
Breve cenno alla fase di recupero palla, dove siamo stati molto efficaci. Ogni volta che la Ternana recuperava/buttava la palla, arrivavamo sempre primi sulla 2a palla grazie alle preventive. Lato negativo (come vedremo): preventive a volte eccessive a danno della fase offensiva.