at the AI hearing, I expect the usual amount of heated, panicky rhetoric plus suggestions for being more like Europe w something along the lines of an 'FDA for Artificial intelligence,' licensing for AI providers or NEPA for algorithms.
On that idea... medium.com/@AdamThierer/n…
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman is apparently going to suggest some sort of formal licensing regime for AI + a new federal bureaucracy. It's common for incumbents to raise the walls against competition, but it's a huge mistake for the public & US competitiveness. 👎🏼reuters.com/technology/ope…
here's what OpenAI's Sam Altman (@sama) should instead being saying at this #AI hearing regarding what an important chance the U.S. has to again be the global leader on emerging tech using a balanced, pro-innovation governance framework: rstreet.org/commentary/wha…@RSI
It is essential that the U.S. be a leader in #AI to ensure our continued global competitive standing & geopolitical security. To do so, we must avoid overly burdensome mandates that undermine AI’s benefits to the public and the nation as a whole. thehill.com/opinion/congre…@RSI
in my recent @RSI study on "Getting Innovation Culture Right," I explore the disastrous history of licensing for communications & media, and explain why America rejected it for the Internet. We must reject it for #AI, too: rstreet.org/research/getti…
the U.S. must reject the E.U.'s innovation-killing top-down model of AI regulation and instead embrace a more flexible, bottom-up governance approach for #artificalintelligence. Here's my big @RSI study on how to strike that balance: rstreet.org/research/flexi…
also, I bet no one at the Senate AI hearing today mentions the First Amendment issues at stake here as the govt looks to create a massive new AI information control regime via licensing regs & new bureaucracies. Stay tuned.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Bureaucratic rigidity has supplanted human responsibility. This is a foundational flaw in the operating system of modern democracy. The hierarchy of democratic authority... exists only on paper."
- from an important new essay by @PhilipKHoward: riponsociety.org/article/democr…
2/ Howard recommends many smart reforms of laws & bureaucracies, including the creation of "spring cleaning" commissions that help craft "simpler codes that leave room for officials and citizens to use their common sense in most situations." 👍
3/ this is similar to "Fresh Start Initiative" that @EconPatrick, @MattMitchell80 & I proposed last year in a @mercatus white paper. We need a formal federal & state approach to regularly revising archaic rules that undermine public welfare. Here it is: mercatus.org/publications/c…
1/ It’s very clear now that for a great many conservatives, when it comes to modern media policy, the ends justify the means. Social media & digital tech platforms are simply part of a broader cultural & political war. And so they say sweeping regulatory controls are justified.
2/ some of you will laugh and say: Well that's always been true! No, it actually hasn't. There was genuine movement in the Reagan-era conservative movement away from treating media as a means to an end or a plaything of whichever party was in power at the time.
3/ Those like Brent Bozell & others who favored the Fairness Doctrine to help conservatives lost out to those who opposed govt control over media platforms. Just go re-read Reagan's powerfully-worded 1987 veto of effort to reinstate Fairness Doctrine. techliberation.com/2020/10/17/a-g…
Conservative responses to the Facebook oversight board decision are now trending even harder in favor of extreme regulatory solutions: breakups, common carriage mandates, or a revived Fairness Doctrine. According, here are several things I've written addressing these proposals...
excellent new law rev article by @GaryMarchant1 on "Governance of Emerging Technologies as a Wicked Problem." A great framework for understanding tech governance challenges & options. vanderbiltlawreview.org/lawreview/2020…
Gary identifies 4 reasons why emerging technologies present major challenges for traditional regulation: (1) the "pacing problem;" (2) many lie outside scope of existing jurisdictions; (3) breadth of application / span many fields; (4) unprecedented uncertainty about them.
He uses this 4-part framework for thinking through the various alternative strategies for governing emerging tech, and categorizes them along two dimensions: ex ante vs. ex post & permissive vs. prohibitive.
1/ @micsolana’s powerfully worded “Extract or Die” essay notes the growing importance of innovation arbitrage as a modern tech policy issue. He notes how CA's “techxodus” -- the migration of the tech industry out of the state -- is accelerating. solana.substack.com/p/extract-or-d…
2/ I’ve written @ innovation arbitrage in essays & my latest book where I defined it as, “The movement of ideas, innovations, or operations to those jurisdictions that provide a legal and regulatory environment more hospitable to entrepreneurial activity.” medium.com/tech-liberatio…
3/ Innovation arbitrage can also be thought of as a form of jurisdictional shopping & can be facilitated by competitive federalism & “voting with your feet." [See @IlyaSomin’s excellent book, “Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration & Political Freedom”] amazon.com/Free-Move-Migr…
1/ Remember when critics were panicking about AT&T's acquisition of DirecTV 5 years ago? Well, now T is already looking to sell at considerable loss. wsj.com/articles/at-t-…
It's another powerful example of technological change decimating market power. But the weird thing is..
2/ history repeated here & neither business exes or regulators learned any lessons. This exact same thing happened to Rupert Murdoch 15 years ago when he & News Corp took a considerable loss on DirecTV, calling it a "turd bird" while spinning it off. dslreports.com/shownews/Murdo…
3/ At time of News Corp-DirecTV deal, one FCC Commissioner worried the deal would “result in unprecedented control over local & national media properties in one global media empire. Its shockwaves will undoubtedly recast our entire media landscape.”