Luca Prosperi Profile picture
May 17 11 tweets 6 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
0/🧵 @Tether_to announced $1.48b profits for Q1 2023 - omfg, and a bit of colour on their reserves

“IS $USDT BACKED?” is the oldest question in crypto

IMO, the appropriate question should be -> “IS $USDT FAIRLY COLLATERALISED?”

Here’s how I personally look at $USDT reserving… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
1/🧵By Q1’23 @Tether_to had issued $79.4b of digital tokens, and held $81.8b of assets -> in other words had net assets for $2.4b

Is this over-collateralisation enough? It depends through which lens you look at Tether:
1) Money transmitter (i.e. just a servicer)
2) Bank/ fund Image
2/🧵What are *MONEY TRANSMITTERS*?

Money transmitters should be mere service providers, they:
- Take your cash, and keep it in quasi-cash assets
- Give you back receipt token/ representation of your cash
- Commit to give you back cash 1-for-1

@circle is issuing $USDC like this
3/🧵Is @Tether_to a money transmitter?

Money transmitters have very (very) tight guidelines on how to store their reserves - and even like this they aren’t great, look at #SVB and @circle almost-debacle

Tether is definitely non-compliant with those guidelines, see yourself Image
4/🧵Ok so @Tether_to is not a money transmitter and has risk in their balance sheet

Is it a fund? Maybe

But Tether doesn’t want to be a fund, it wants to be a *BANK*

Why? Because banks can issue cheap liabiliites that are not securities - as Tether wants to do with $USDT
4/🧵 But banks (should) have adequate buffering for this privilege (ask @BIS_org)

Common Equity Tier 1 % is the best proxy we have to see whether this buffering is adequate

CET1 % = Equity Capital / Risk Weighted Assets

RWAs = like-for-like asset measure weighted for their… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
5/🧵 Trying to apply standard risk-weights to @Tether_to, we see:
* c. 20% assets not for money transmitters
* c. $10b opaque/ risky assets may require significant weighting
* Huge impact of their $BTC position

Best/ worst scenario is 19.8% / 8.9% CET1 % (vs. EU average 14-15%)
6/🧵 Below is my ultimate cheat-sheet for @Tether_to capital position:
* Gap of $1.5b with strict credit quality assumptions and punitive $BTC weighting
* Fair capitalisation with more benevolent assumptions

-> Tether’s capital position is tightly linked to their $BTC position Image
7/🧵 *HOWEVER* analysis has several assumptions:
* No non-performing credit
* No add-ons for interest rate, as well as operational risk
* Limited add-ons for directional market risk
* Fair representation of all positions

A bit too much for a 0-yielding quasi-money like $USDT
END/🧵 Here’s for the nerds (please @elonmusk don’t kill my S**s*a*ck link

open.substack.com/pub/dirtroads/…

@Tether_to $USDT @circle $USDC #stablecoins
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Luca Prosperi

Luca Prosperi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LucaProsperi

Apr 7
0/🧵 In January 2023 @g_dip, @Oliver_Schimek, and myself founded M^ZERO LABS_ (@m0labs) - this is why we did it

What will M^ZERO be? A neutral value transmission framework able to permissionlessly mint currencies under decentralized governance

This is *MY VERY PERSONAL* view 👇 Image
1/🧵 MONEY IS OUR MOST COMPLEX MASS-ADOPTED PRODUCT

> Money intermediates value exchange across very complex networks, minimizing friction

> In well-functioning money systems, this ease of use translates to extremely beneficial cost of funding for (sovereign) money minters Image
2/🧵 EXAMPLES OF SOLID MONEY SYSTEMS

> Thanks to a superior $USD system, @USTreasury has benefited from below-market funding rates for decades

> Thanks to the smooth CDP system, @MakerDAO has been benefiting from very low risk-adjusted cost of borrowing (DSR) from $DAI holders Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 20
🧵/ You can choose whether to look at the moon or at the pointing finger instead

With #CreditSuisse #SVBank at al. getting pumped back to life by the State, we should start asking whether the state-bank alliance makes much sense anymore

BANKING IS BROKEN, HALLELUJAH 👇
1/ The fact that #SVBank failure was a shock for markets tells a lot about the quality of markets (and regulators)

Below, an extract from SVB's regulatory disclosures. What was the regulator doing instead of observing the most classic of bank’s maturity mismatches?
2/ I don't want to go all the way to conspiracy theory, but who was extracting the most value from #SVBank, or in other words who had more (short-term) incentives for SVB to keep operating as it was?

Below, another extract. Hint: not only tech benefited from low IR...
Read 10 tweets
Feb 14
0/ I’m on a personal fight to remove the word Real-World Assets (or RWA) from the DeFi jargon

It is truly a logical insult and a counterintuitive definition that can do way more harm than good

*PLEASE* help - here is why 👇🏻
1/ EVERYTHING IS AN ASSET

Whether you can ascribe value to that, and with confidence, it’s a different story. But everything is an asset, from housing to $BTC to watches to reputation to time
2/ WE HAVE BEEN MATERIALISING ASSETS FOR CENTURIES

We started simple and became convoluted. Currently, even (sub-types of) risk, even volatility, is an asset. You own a CDS contract on your balance sheet you have an asset with a fair value
Read 6 tweets
Nov 18, 2022
0/ I’m a broken record but *I DON’T CARE*

It is easy to write post mortem on how bad was @FTX_Official fuck up, but useless

I’ll do something else, I will show you what parallelisms there are between FTX and a so-called OG I know well, @MakerDAO

Might be useful 🧵
1/ Sin 1 - CENTRALISED DECISION-MAKING

@FTX_Official power was controlled by a small group of insiders tight around the founder @SBF_FTX, with investors staying silent

@MakerDAO is de facto controlled by @RuneKek the founder and a tight group of insiders - proved in LOVE vote
2/ Sin 2 - LACK OF CHECKS AND BALANCES

@FTX_Official had completely unsatisfactory risk controls, making risk management impossible

@MakerDAO has developed Risk controls only for transparent ERC-20 exposure, but zero for off-chain exposures now approaching 500m
Read 8 tweets
Sep 5, 2022
0/🧵

DeFi liquidity went down from 200b ATH to current 60-ish, bettered by interest rates, frauds, bad execution

I couldn’t be happier to invest and build today. These are my:
# 3 most relevant protocols
# 3 protocols I’d stay away from
# 3 things we are missing IMO

🧵 👇🏻
1/10 Most relevant protocol # 1: @LidoFinance

With the merge coming, there’s no protocol that has higher potential to transform DeFi:
- Develop new primitive with $stETH
- Spin out native stable
- Expand across other PoS chains
- Express pressure on $ETH governance
2/10 Most relevant protocol # 2: @maplefinance

We all know DeFi needs institutional liquidity, but institutional liquidity needs quality of execution

Maple has worked hard to develop the infrastructure

We invested at @CherryVentures and it feels only the beginning
Read 11 tweets
Jul 15, 2022
0/7 > I had the intuition that flat & naive 1-token-1-vote crypto governance systems are *AWFUL* in uncertain environments, so I tried to prove it. This week Dirt Roads is for *NERDS* and modelled gonzo-mathematical games of governance 🧵👇

dirtroads.substack.com/p/-43-first-pr…
1/7 > 1st game: Optimistic Governance Game - OGG:
* Voters are good people
* Voters are not proponents
* Proposals can be benevolent or malevolent, and cannot be distinguished
* Malevolent proposals have huge private benefit at the expense of a probability of blow-up Image
2/7 > Even by being trivial, OGGs give us few hints:
* There’s incentive for bad proponents to promise a lot
* There’s a dominant incentive to look good
* Illiquidity (delayed outcome) has a premium
* Maximising for value isn’t equal to maximising for survival Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(