A systematic review shows the potential of parent-targeted eHealth educational interventions in reducing infant procedural pain. These interventions can be accessed through various eHealth platforms, providing parents with accessible & flexible ways to learn at their own pace.
Parental involvement during procedures, such as providing skin-to-skin contact or breastfeeding, effectively reduces pain experienced during acute procedures.
Although parents are concerned with how to protect their infants from pain or stress in early life, they often are not aware of their capacity with procedural pain management.
Equipping parents with information about infant procedural pain management can lead to greater parental involvement and the provision of effective pain management for infants.
#eHealth educational interventions can lead to greater parental confidence, knowledge, attitudes, and use of procedural pain management strategies.
eHealth interventions can be accessed through video conferencing, mHealth apps, web-based platforms, videos, interactive training, simulation, and SMS, providing parents with multiple ways to access information and learn.
Parents generally have a high acceptance of eHealth interventions about infant procedural pain management, which highlights the importance of providing parents with accessible and flexible educational resources.
eHealth interventions can be an effective way to educate parents about infant procedural pain management. It can lead to improvements in parental involvement, confidence, knowledge, attitudes, & use of procedural pain management strategies, which ultimately benefits infants.
PTSD rates are higher in Emergency First Responders (EFRs) compared to the general population. However, the role PTSD plays in the life of the EFR's family is missing from literature.
A new qualitative systematic review included 5 studies with rich qualitative data regarding the experience of family members of EFRs with PTSD.
Qualitative research allows a more nuanced exploration of the effects on family members and
highlights risk factors.
During #JBIMethodology Month we’ll be sharing a series of #MethodsInAMinute tweetorials. We’ll begin with key points on Umbrella Reviews by A/Prof Edoardo Aromataris 👇
With the ever-increasing number of systematic reviews & research syntheses available to inform topics in healthcare, SRs of existing reviews, or umbrella reviews, are increasingly being conducted to summarise a broad scope of issues related to a given topic.
An umbrella review is also ideal in highlighting if the evidence base around a topic or question is consistent or if contradictory or discrepant findings exist, and in exploring and detailing the reasons why.
JBI’s approach to evidence-based healthcare is unique. JBI considers #EBHC as decision-making that considers the feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness and effectiveness (FAME) of healthcare practices. Read below to learn more about the JBI Model of EBHC.
The inner circle represents the pebble of knowledge while the inner wedges provide JBI’s conceptualisation of the steps involved in the process of achieving an evidence-based approach to clinical decision-making.
The outer wedges operationalise the component parts of the Model and articulate how they might be actioned in a pragmatic way. The arrows indicate that the flow can be bi-directional.
The latest issue of the JBI Evidence Synthesis journal is out now and includes THREE diverse evidence syntheses, each employing a different #JBIMethodology.
A qualitative systematic review aims to identify, critically appraise, and synthesise the available evidence on the experiences of people with progressive memory disorders who are involved in non-pharmacological interventions: journals.lww.com/jbisrir/Abstra…
Qualitative methods & data are increasing in usage in #EBHC research. Instead of quantifying or statistically portraying the data or findings, qualitative research focuses on individuals & gives voice to the patient/client or provider in the healthcare decision-making process.