Bit tired of people saying 'there are no votes in social conservatism or having Christian values inform your politics'. Not sure that that is necessarily true, but even if it is, I don't care. If the truth put me in a minority of one, the truth would be no less the truth
Establishment social libs of left and right sneer at any expression of soc con sentiment: 'I thought this was settled years ago', 'these people are so backwards'. They cannot even conceive of principled rejection of the cultural and social air that they breathe. Let them sneer
Their lazy liberal orthodoxy amounts to the philosophy of 'I am a selfish bastard who should be able to do whatever I want and damn the consequences for children or the poor'. They dress it up as principle, but that is what it is: licence in the garb of liberty
It isn't surprising that licentiousness and moral anarchy are popular in some quarters (tho not as popular as they think). Restraint and duty are hard. But don't pretend that your indifference and selfishness is some great moral crusade
Another thing: I thought that liberals were supposed to stand up for the right of people to hold unpopular minority views. Actually, they wish to crush and humiliate anyone who doesn't blindly accept their moral revolution. But I for one will die in a ditch to stop them
Because the next wave is coming. Commercial surrogacy. Designer babies. 'Assisted dying'. Trans self-ID. Late term abortion. Drug legalisation. They won't rest until they can completely eliminate or stupefy or dehumanise the dependent & the poor to make life easier for themselves
It is a complete barbaric attack on the entire Christian moral legacy of our civilization. It shares the ethic of the Victorian mill owner, the pagan Roman chucking babies to die on a rubbish heap, the slaveowner buying people's children to use up and wear out at their pleasure
Mercy & truth & love are on our side, not theirs. If their squalid Brave New World-style dystopia becomes a reality, we will see how much compassion really lies behind their #bekind rhetoric. Lies will always end up in some moral catastrophe if they become the basis of a society
So hold the bloody line and don't let these people convince you they have the moral high ground. 'Resist, steadfast in the faith'
Here endeth the sermon
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This seat in Cambridge has for many years been so safe for Labour that you weigh the vote. So big is the hatred for Labour's congestion charge plans that, despite huge national anti-Tory swing, the Tories got a 20% swing and nearly won
The incumbent cllr - Bob Dryden - is one of the few salt-of-the-earth working class Lab cllrs left, and he opposes the congestion charge. Middle class cycle-shagging 'Labour' liberals almost lost him his seat. He's been a Lab cllr continuously since 1995
Being in Cambridgeshire in this election feels like a weird parallel universe. Tories doing well all over the county due to the congestion charge being as popular as Gary Glitter opening a Mothercare branch
As we prepare to hear the King promise to 'maintain the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law' in his Coronation Oath on Saturday, today we remember the heroes of the Reformation who were burned for their trouble. Martyrs such as Cranmer, Latimer and Ridley
'Play the man, Master Ridley; we shall this day light such a candle, by God's grace, in England, as I trust shall never be put out.'
I am an old High Churchman with some quibbles with the Oxford Martyrs' theology, but I respect them immensely and I'm with them more than I'm not.
Since Britain didn't exist as a unified political entity until 1707, it would be pretty odd if it were otherwise. England, on the other hand, is a nation with such a continuous history and identity
All of the clever-clever 'invention of tradition'/'imagined community' 'it was all a 19th century fabrication' gotchas just don't work with England. England has been a continuous nation state with a distinctive language, legal system, culture etc since about Athelstan at least
Yes, we've been invaded a few times, put up with the Norman Yoke, and had various dynastic games of musical chairs with our royal family, but the English nation is a political and historical reality with very deep roots. Britain is quite another matter
Today we commemorate the blessed martyr Charles I, who on 30th January 1649 laid down his life for the sake of the apostolic integrity of the Church of England. He forgave his murderers on the scaffold having lived a life of unimpeachable Christian virtue.
Remember
A defender of the poor and weak against the enclosing landlords; an uxorious husband; a loving father; a pious upholder of the Church, he presided over 11 years of peace and prosperity until the fanatical self-interested Puritans fomented bloody rebellion and war
The net result of their rebellion, fuelled by Puritan extremism, was instability, bloodshed and anarchy, leading first to the rule of dismal Presbyterians who showed no more toleration in religion than Laud, then onwards to tyrannical military dictatorship
I've had a wave of bitter tweets going on and on about how appalling Britain is and how nothing can get better and we'd all better leave. Yes we have major problems, but this is hysterical rubbish, tbh. As many hysterical Britain-haters on the right as the left...
In fact, the virulence against Britain almost seems more bitter among some on the right. A country isn't just some contractual arrangement which you abandon when you feel the terms aren't being kept: it's a covenant, a mutual bond of obligations over time that you can't just quit
In any case, the grass is always greener. Many western countries have similar problems to the ones we have. Leave here and you'll find the same, or slightly different, problems. We're still a relatively safe and prosperous country, whatever our issues
Today the Church of England commemorates Charles Gore, Bishop of Oxford in the early 20th century, a great theologian and Christian apologist who did much to help Anglicanism respond with integrity and faith to the scientific and critical challenges of the 19th century
In this great book Gore responded with great subtlety to the secular headwinds of his day, making mincemeat of much of the liberal Protestant Biblical criticism of the 19th century. His work did much to steady the ship of faith among thinking Anglicans in unpropitious times
I think he's a great model because he responded intelligently to the challenges of secular thought but crucially WITHOUT trying to alter Christian faith and morals to fit the modish orthodoxy of the day. He was a staunch conservative on e.g. divorce, contraception etc