CourtWatchMA Profile picture
May 18 6 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
This piece thoroughly examines the extreme racial disparities in pretrial detention and 58A requests.

But there's a math error in this video: boston25news.com/news/lawmakers…

By these numbers, the percent of district court cases in Suffolk with a dangerousness hearing is 2.2%, not .02%. Screenshot from Boston25 in...
That said, a bigger problem: the figure has a misleading denominator.

80% of MA cases involve a lead misdemeanor charge. The *vast* majority of misdemeanors are *statutorily ineligible* for these hearings.

The denominator should be cases with *eligible* offenses, not all cases.
Getting those numbers right matters because it allows for a more precise investigation into @DAKevinHayden's claim that his office uses these hearings judiciously.

They routinely file them on possession offenses without any individualized assessment of the particular defendant.
And @DAKevinHayden should get critical questions about this because as @RepChynahTyler said last year during the budget fight when Gov. Baker pitted increased jailing against #NoCostCalls, 90% of people Suffolk prosecutors try to jail are people of color!
We've been talking about racism in prosecutorial requests for 58A hearings & pretrial detention in #mapoli for years.

It's really important to understand who is being detained in the name of safety, even though in reality jail makes us all less safe.
Every few years someone writes a bombshell report about the alarming, continuing increase in 58A hearings, but they often leave out the racism issues.

Thank you to @boston25 @KerryKavanaugh @ReporterMarina for making that a centerpiece of your story.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with CourtWatchMA

CourtWatchMA Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CourtWatchMA

May 15
🧵 Big day for equal protection litigation in criminal cases, with significant pronouncements from the MA Supreme Judicial Court.

In Van Rader, J. Gaziano for a unanimous court affirms that the selective enforcement standard in Com. v. Long applies to all types of policing!  The issue having been squa...
Justice Gaziano notes that, like traffic stops, pedestrian stops are deliberate choices by police officers, that proving a negative (people not stopped) is nearly impossible for defendants to do, and that the lack of data requires a totality standard to make EPC claims workable. For similar reasons, the th...The inaccessibility or unav...5 We note that the decision...
Justice Gaziano also clarifies how selective prosecution & selective enforcement differ.

In doing so, he confirms that the "presumption of regularity" applies to decisions by police/prosecutors to charge someone with a crime, but NOT to police investigatory tactics & decisions. i. Selective enforcement an...The presumption of regulari...
Read 9 tweets
Apr 27, 2021
At some point policy proposals like this aren't accidental. Our highest court acknowledges traffic enforcement throughout MA targets Black & Brown people.

So policy like this? It's racist. "Disparities" aren't unintended consequences, they're foreseeable & probable. Purposeful.
When commentators frame policy like this as being dense and unthinking--instead of knowing and intended to increase police power to stop the usual people in the usual way--it gives white supremacy an out.
Textbook carceral state expansion playbook:

1. Name bills for sympathetic crime victims
2. Lie to the public that tougher penalties deter behavior (empirically untrue)
3. Enhance law enforcement discretion
4. Create penalties for conduct that is already independently punished
Read 4 tweets
Feb 20, 2021
Today the Mass. Appeals Court published a 3-2 decision upholding a racist stop & frisk of a Black 16-year-old girl in public housing at the urging of the @SCDAONews Appeals Unit.

Every day, @DARollins' Appeals Unit erodes the constitutional rights of poor people of color.

🧵 MILKEY, J. (dissenting in part, with whom Henry, J., joins).
This case involved Samora Lopes, a BPD gang unit cop who the Supreme Judicial Court *already found* has a pattern of making unlawful, racially discriminatory traffic stops.

Lopes was acting on a 3-hour-old tip that some kids had a gun outside a housing development.
Lopes, 60 feet away inside his car, watched a girl walk away from a group of kids & repeatedly look over her shoulder + put her hands near her waistband, though he couldn't really see what she was doing since he was watching from behind. On that basis, he decided she had a gun.
Read 13 tweets
Oct 31, 2020
We hear there are now 63 confirmed positives at Norfolk, and people are being moved from single cells to 35-men dormitories.

A positive test does not always mean a positive case. But isolating all people together in one large group WILL spread the virus.
The DOC has shown reckless disregard in responding to COVID-19. It ignores the CDC best practice of *testing all staff* in the prisons. When an outbreak emerges, they conduct "facility-wide testing" BUT *excluding staff,* the primary vectors of bringing disease into a prison!
The DOC ignores quarantine & isolation protocols. In April, in one known case, the DOC gave a medically vulnerable woman COVID by quarantining her *on the COVID unit* after she returned from an unrelated outside hospitalization. They didn't isolate confirmed COVID cases!
Read 9 tweets
Apr 5, 2020
THREAD

1/ Some people may be released under the tinyurl.com/sjcruling! That's so important.

But let's get the facts. We broke down who can seek relief w/ @justicehealing.

This ruling creates relief beyond existing law for people jailed on bail revocation or a probation hold.
2/ People held pretrial on bail, bail revocation, or a probation hold can file a motion for review & get a hearing within 48 hours.

Anyone held on nonviolent/nonserious offenses* gets a presumption of release, which can be rebutted.
__
*Not in Appendix A: mass.gov/files/document…
3/ Already, the bail statute presumes release - regardless of charge - unless there's risk of flight.

But under the SJC case, release is presumed only for people charged with non-excluded offenses, and it can be rebutted by an "unreasonable danger" or "very high risk" of flight.
Read 10 tweets
Sep 4, 2019
Arraignments continue today from this weekend's arrests

The lead @nlgmass lawyer representing arrestees, @SusanBChurch11, was just TAKEN INTO CUSTODY on contempt for reading case law into the record about how denying nolle pros violated the law!!

Judge Sinnott is OUT OF CONTROL
@nlgmass @SusanBChurch11 Today @SCDAONews ADAs are lawfully declining charges w/ Rule 16 nolle prosequis. We're grateful to @DARollins for her clarion leadership on this!

Dreadful, unlawful judicial behavior > > > new standard ADA practice for declining charges in all BMC courts!
@nlgmass @SusanBChurch11 @SCDAONews @DARollins Court support for the contempt hearing come to BMC central 5th floor courtroom 17
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(