Another nice example recently of the importance of a systematic approach to assessment of mitral regurgitation during TOE
Indication was known MR, assess suitability for TEER
Mid oesophageal 4Ch & 5Ch views...wondering if we have the right patient! No real MR to see...
The segmentation approach in the bicommisural view is a very reliable and easy-to-do method
Start at the lateral side of the valve with X-plane (Philips) / MultiD (GE) and you have A1-P1 coaptation on the right side...do this with 2D only & then with colour Doppler too
Then move to the middle of the valve with your cursor, cutting through A2 in bicomm view so you see A2-P2 coaptation on the right side
It takes time to read the paper, read the supplementary appendix, analyse the results, think about them etc!
Some thoughts...🧵
On Sunday I wrote a thread about asymptomatic severe AS and what we knew already from RECOVERY & AVATAR RCTs and what the guidelines currently advocate
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), when performed with care and diligence, can reveal a lot about the valve. TOE isn't necessary in all cases to determine leaflet pathology.
A worked example below:
In the PLAX view, you can assess the scallops of the leaflets
In a true PLAX view with aortic valve clearly visible, you mostly see the A2-P2 interface. Here, you can see a clear & large prolapse of the posterior leaflet
If you tilt upwards towards the PLAX RV outflow (pulmonary valve) view you see mostly the A1-P1 interface
Here, you can see the valve looks slightly different & no prolapse is seen
PE has garnered a reputation for huge profits as they typically buy into a company, aggressively ⬇️ costs whilst ⬆️ profit margins, leverage debt if needed, and then sell, often at a large profit
Does this matter when it comes to delivering healthcare services?