Er.... @FeeRedfern @carl_jurassic why does the Epstein-linked @nyphospital turn up everywhere we look? ohdsi.org/wp-content/upl…
WHOA!
And every where we look... under every stone... we find @IQVIA_global
The "data collaborator" for every COVID study you will never see the data for.
@MartinNeil9
@IQVIA_global @MartinNeil9 BINGO. Holy crap.
This study was published in 2020 and was basically the third in the #Lancetgate series.
Completely unverifiable and no possibility of being real data.
Where did the data come from?
IQVIA. Jennifer Lane (an unknown). Oxford. OHDSI...
@nyphospital (Jeffrey Epstein)
Oxford.
Astrazeneca.
Columbia Irving.
Erasmus (Marion Koopmans)
Vanderbilt
David Geffen
Bayer
Chinese Academy (CCP)
No such thing as a "conspiracy theory" when the conspiracy is this big.
They didn't know this when they chose "88" as their theme?
Well, maybe symbolism will be their downfall.
Hades?
Give me a break.
@1979pop
And who the hell is this guy?
Absolutely nothing to see here.
I'm going to try and spell this out.
@OHDSI are a shell corporation for #BigPharma, recruiting geeks with no clinical experience to push synthetic data sets generated by @IQVIA_global to create papers that convince the world to buy their products.
That's it.
#COVIDin1tweet
@OHDSI @IQVIA_global And you know what?
If @OHDSI or @IQVIA_global don't like what I've just revealed, they can give me access to Jennifer Lane's full dataset and I will show you whether it's real.
You know why?....
@boriquagato @ndorms @jennifercelane
@OHDSI @IQVIA_global @boriquagato @ndorms @jennifercelane ...because #hydroxychloroquine is one of the safest drugs on earth and there is ZERO chance that it is associated with a 65% increased risk of cardiac mortality as claimed by @jennifercelane
This paper is literally #surgisphere 3.
You know how I know?...
@OHDSI @IQVIA_global @boriquagato @ndorms @jennifercelane Because I've been in this business longer than Jenny from the block and she had never written a first author paper of any significance before IQVIA ghost wrote this one for her.
What @TheBurninBeard is saying here is that the clinical samples that had "COVID" also had gene signatures of Mycoplasma fermentans, a US military pathogen that can be used as a vector to carry viral clones.
@SabinehazanMD found it too.
🧵
#spraygate @BrokenTruthTV
Can you see that Norman Pieniazek, who headed up the CDC's research division at the time that the @CDCgov sent biological weapons to Iraq to start a war, took himself out of this thread?
Every vaccine scientist will try to convince you that the drop in u25 cancers was due to the vaccine when it was merely due to the change in screening.
But check out the HUGE RISE in 25+ cancers. This pattern is repeated in Scotland and Australia where similar changes to the screening age were made a few years after the introduction of coerced vaccination, obfuscating the figures to hide a scandalous rise in 25-29 age cervical cancers after the vaccine rollout.
For clarity most cancers in this age group are early and detected on screening before they become advanced. Moving the screening age meant that they were diagnosed later and therefore in an older age bracket.
The big red arrow is pointing to the preinvasive diagnoses which tend to mirror the actual cancers - the upper chart was too busy.
Here is the same from the OP with arrows showing both cancer (above) and precancer (below) which both rose significantly after the vaccine rollout
And here is the same data from Cancer Research UK (smoothed) showing a doubling of cancer rates in the over 25s for at least 5 years after the vaccine rollout. cancerresearchuk.org/health-profess…