Er.... @FeeRedfern @carl_jurassic why does the Epstein-linked @nyphospital turn up everywhere we look? ohdsi.org/wp-content/upl…
WHOA!
And every where we look... under every stone... we find @IQVIA_global
The "data collaborator" for every COVID study you will never see the data for.
@MartinNeil9
@IQVIA_global @MartinNeil9 BINGO. Holy crap.
This study was published in 2020 and was basically the third in the #Lancetgate series.
Completely unverifiable and no possibility of being real data.
Where did the data come from?
IQVIA. Jennifer Lane (an unknown). Oxford. OHDSI...
@nyphospital (Jeffrey Epstein)
Oxford.
Astrazeneca.
Columbia Irving.
Erasmus (Marion Koopmans)
Vanderbilt
David Geffen
Bayer
Chinese Academy (CCP)
No such thing as a "conspiracy theory" when the conspiracy is this big.
They didn't know this when they chose "88" as their theme?
Well, maybe symbolism will be their downfall.
Hades?
Give me a break.
@1979pop
And who the hell is this guy?
Absolutely nothing to see here.
I'm going to try and spell this out.
@OHDSI are a shell corporation for #BigPharma, recruiting geeks with no clinical experience to push synthetic data sets generated by @IQVIA_global to create papers that convince the world to buy their products.
That's it.
#COVIDin1tweet
@OHDSI @IQVIA_global And you know what?
If @OHDSI or @IQVIA_global don't like what I've just revealed, they can give me access to Jennifer Lane's full dataset and I will show you whether it's real.
You know why?....
@boriquagato @ndorms @jennifercelane
@OHDSI @IQVIA_global @boriquagato @ndorms @jennifercelane ...because #hydroxychloroquine is one of the safest drugs on earth and there is ZERO chance that it is associated with a 65% increased risk of cardiac mortality as claimed by @jennifercelane
This paper is literally #surgisphere 3.
You know how I know?...
@OHDSI @IQVIA_global @boriquagato @ndorms @jennifercelane Because I've been in this business longer than Jenny from the block and she had never written a first author paper of any significance before IQVIA ghost wrote this one for her.
I'm going to explain why this chart is so important and why @jsm2334 is being disingenuous by ignoring it - whilst making points that undermine the "real world vaccine data" industry.
It's a Kaplan-Meier curve and it obliterates Jeffrey's argument.
Just to go over it... the lines show what proportion of subjects (children) ended up without chronic disease up to 10 years after being studied.
It's called a survival analysis because it's used for cancer survival.
If the red line was a cancer drug it would be a blockbuster
It shows that by the end of the 10 year follow-up, of those that they could still follow up (who stayed in the study) 57% (100-43%) of vaccinated kids had chronic disease (e.g. asthma) and 17% (100-83%) of unvaccinated kids did.
Janet Diaz was the person that led the #MAGICApp guideline committees that stopped your grandma getting antibiotics for her post-viral pneumonia, leading to her death.
But she did this with the help of @pervandvik who deleted his account
Diaz here tells you that COVID kills you by an overreacting immune response, but that was never true.
She was an intensivist recruited by the WHO in 2018.
None of this was true, but it sold a LOT of drugs and killed a LOT of people
Which US govt organisation blew a hole in the ozone layer in 1958 by sending atomic bombs to the troposphere over the Antarctic in operation Argus - then blaming the resulting destruction of ozone on CFC's?
It wasn't just Pfizer that hid the fact that the mRNA-LNP complex went to the ovaries (where it could not possibly provide its declared function in the lung).
The AMH drop (ovarian reserve) after vaccination was later shown by the Manniche paper after being denied by the Kate Clancy and Viki Males of the world.
But this time the Arnold foundation's @RetractionWatch have not only revealed with their "exclusive" that they were directly involved in trying to get this important paper retracted...
🧵If you have decided after 48 hours that "The Israelis did it" you have not only fallen for the deep state's playbook again... but you probably think that Ashley Babbitt was killed by a movie gunshot to the shoulder.
Stop falling for the narratives.
[credit: @wooz_news ]
For the record the official cause of death was listed as "gunshot wound to the left anterior shoulder". This is not possible as the cause of death of the woman in the video as portrayed.
Instantaneous death as portrayed in the Babbitt video cannot happen with a gunshot to the shoulder as it does not involve the spinal cord or brain.
There are also no major vessels to bleed out (which would take a while) other than the subclavian. If that bled out enough to cause mortality there would be a bloodbath.
The Wooz news video confirms the lack of bleeding.