Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
May 20, 2023 β€’ 23 tweets β€’ 8 min read β€’ Read on X
Unhealthy Cheese πŸ§€πŸ§€
#EMRgate 🧡

This is how it works.
Your hospital signs you up to an overseas EMR (health record) corporation.
They get your health data.
You get zip.

That data is used to generate artificial study data that promotes a drug, and Pharma makes $billions.

Here's an example. @addenbrookes hospital - one of the biggest hospitals in the country and a massive #BigPharma advocate...

Gives your health data to @epic.
What, you didn't know?
It's written in the T&C. Right at the bottom of a 4,400 word disclaimer.
Can't you see it?
Now comes the smart part.
Usually @NEJM or @thelancet are involved.
A noob medic comes along with a first author paper from a massive collaboration of people who don't know each other.

The noob puts together an analysis of a 900,000+ patient cohort. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32864627/
There are 14 data sources from different countries.
>900,000 patients.
Data amassed over 20 years up to the same year of the publication (therefore limited time for analysis).
Cleaning, matching, imputing this data would take 2 years+.
Yet we are expected to believe that an orthopaedic registrar with no prior publication record did this in a couple of months.

Not possible.

The APPENDIX for the study alone is 130 pages.
Multiple pharma and database companies were involved which would mean months of back & forth emails and agreements.

Some of the ethics approvals (where they bothered) would take months. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…

This is how we worked out that #surgisphere (#lancetgate) was fake.

Both @thelancet and @NEJM were involved, because they are simp journals for #BigPharma.

The study size prohibited any valid analysis in the time they proposed, it was impossible.
Which means these studies are either synthetic (created by modelling prior data sets gleaned by skimming your health data) or ghost written (written by Pharma employees with AI help).

In this case both of these things are likely to be true...
But @jennifercelane went along with it anyway. I have no idea what her contribution was but it looks like she was the "medic" front for a paper ghost written and produced by Pharma and @IQVIA_global who are the vaccine industry's data curators (or creators).
And here's the clincher.
This should have been a red flag to Jenny and @prieto_alhambra who was the supervising author.

You see, it's a simple fact that azithromycin isn't a treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Nor a long term treatment for anything in common use. Image
So it's just not possible that a third of the cohort taking hydroxychloroquine were also taking azithromycin long term.

Find a rheumatologist and ask them how many patients on HCQ they also treat with azithromycin.

Zero. It's not a treatment.
Long-term azithromycin use is rare - bronchiectasis and other unusual indications. If it's used long term (I've never seen someone on it) it would be low dose, not the doses suggested in this paper.

We're talking less than 1:10,000 people
So the probability that one-third of a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients were also on long term azithromycin, when that is less than 1:10,000 people?


I'm calling this paper fake until the data is available to public inspection...

"Patient level data not available". Image
So this paper must be assumed to be the 3rd in the #surgisphere #lancetgate scandal.

The 4th would have to be @bengoldacre's @OPENSAFELY paper in the @TheLancetRheum that is also not available to inspection.

All attempting to discredit #HCQpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33349815/
And all these papers (including the original #surgisphere papers) appear to have been ghost written, because it's not possible for the lead authors to do what they did in the time available.
And the real people that provided the health data have no idea that their data is being used to push a false Pharma narrative that is endangering them, and making billions for the pharma companies who then pump a few quid back into the institutions.

Bargain Basement Bribery
πŸ‘†πŸ‘†πŸ‘†this is #EMRgate.

But this πŸ‘‡πŸ‘‡πŸ‘‡ is just one thread of the back-story.

#surgisphere #surgisphere3 #EMRgate
@chrismartenson @FeeRedfern

Correction and apologies - @epic is not the twitter account of EPIC health care.... this was a typo.

Please feel free to remove your tag from the conversation as twitter doesn't let us edit or remove users from tweets
@chrismartenson @FeeRedfern BINGO and BOOM πŸ’₯πŸ’₯πŸ’₯

Here's your ghost writer.
Patrick Ryan of @OHDSI and @JanssenGlobal

The lead author should be the corresponding author.
If the corresponding author is not the lead author, it's because they don't want you asking questions of the lead author.
@chrismartenson @FeeRedfern @OHDSI @JanssenGlobal

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Jan 25
@JaninePaynter @PetousisH Following 4 years of enforced medical interventions does the public trust or distrust public health?
@JaninePaynter @PetousisH Always worth recording after the early polling and before the pharma companies send in their accounts.

It's like Georgia. Someone flood the polling station quick! Image
@JaninePaynter @PetousisH And here we have it.
The poll started off in one direction, and as soon as the pharma brigade got hold of it, it went the opposite way.

The problem is that they now have 19 hours to keep the bots going.

@elonmusk please make poll voting a 2-step interaction. TY.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 28, 2023
BOOM πŸ’₯πŸ’₯
It's a gene therapy.
It was a gene therapy yesterday.
It will still be a gene therapy tomorrow.
With a plasmid, it's two gene therapies.

The OGTR confirms:
"Under the gene technology act an [OGTR] approval would have been required"

@SenatorRennick @double_christ
@SenatorRennick @Double_Christ This was a lie from Dr Raj Bhula.
It's transfection.
It's in the Pfizer documents that the TGA have.
Everybody knows it's transfection.
If Dr Bhula doesn't know, she should resign immediately.
The OGTR failed.
From the document that @SenatorRennick is referring to.

They never knew what they were doing. They just needed to make you take it.
Who told them to do that?
And why was it necessary for you to have 3 transfections in order to earn a living?

Read 9 tweets
Oct 25, 2023
Hi @peterdaszak now that I have your attention why did Alice Latinne hide those viral sequences from your 2019 Nature paper, and where did the GP-120 sequences come from?

Asking for 6.9m people who can't, because they died.

Read 7 tweets
Oct 23, 2023
Well, it used to be rare.

This is the same rare lymphoma that Michel Goldman wrote about developing after a COVID mRNA "vaccine".

(see next tweet).

Michel Goldman's story in the Atlantic
Original paper - which was Michel Goldman's own story, published in Frontiers.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 22, 2023
Were the claims made in this press conference by a high profile CNN doctor true?

Watch the conference clip and follow the thread below.
It is impossible to know what is happening in another part of the world unless you are there.

But the statements made by Gassan Abu-Sittah cannot be true as made.

If not true they could even qualify as an incitement to further violence. Image
The claims made by Dr Abu-Sittah are not accidental or misinterpreted.

He specifically claimed that 500 people were killed - days after the press conference when it was known that was not true.

Read 15 tweets
Oct 18, 2023
The author of the BMJ article quoted by Viki as if it is gospel is a freelance journalist. He chose not to include that qualifier in this BMJ piece.

This tweet from Viki is propaganda because it suggests something that is not true, adding the @bmj_latest label for authenticity
@bmj_latest Here is the request for the data underlying the MBRRACE report.

Data from the @NPEU_UKOSS has previously been requested under FOI and denied.

This is not their data, it belongs to the British public who fund them.

@bmj_latest @NPEU_UKOSS The BMJ article itself is just an opinion piece from a freelance journalist, basically repeating the party line - that only unvaccinated pregnant women died of COVID.

This is a misrepresentation of the truth.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!