Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
May 20, 2023 23 tweets 8 min read Read on X
Unhealthy Cheese 🧀🧀
#EMRgate 🧵

This is how it works.
Your hospital signs you up to an overseas EMR (health record) corporation.
They get your health data.
You get zip.

That data is used to generate artificial study data that promotes a drug, and Pharma makes $billions.

Image
Image
Image
Here's an example. @addenbrookes hospital - one of the biggest hospitals in the country and a massive #BigPharma advocate...

Gives your health data to @epic.
What, you didn't know?
It's written in the T&C. Right at the bottom of a 4,400 word disclaimer.
Can't you see it?
https://mychart.addenbrookes.nhs.uk/mychart/Authentication/Login?mode=stdfile&option=faq#GI_priv
Image
Now comes the smart part.
Usually @NEJM or @thelancet are involved.
A noob medic comes along with a first author paper from a massive collaboration of people who don't know each other.

The noob puts together an analysis of a 900,000+ patient cohort. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32864627/
There are 14 data sources from different countries.
>900,000 patients.
Data amassed over 20 years up to the same year of the publication (therefore limited time for analysis).
Cleaning, matching, imputing this data would take 2 years+.
@chrismartenson
Yet we are expected to believe that an orthopaedic registrar with no prior publication record did this in a couple of months.

Not possible.

The APPENDIX for the study alone is 130 pages.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=lane%2C+…
Multiple pharma and database companies were involved which would mean months of back & forth emails and agreements.

Some of the ethics approvals (where they bothered) would take months. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…

Image
Image
This is how we worked out that #surgisphere (#lancetgate) was fake.

Both @thelancet and @NEJM were involved, because they are simp journals for #BigPharma.

The study size prohibited any valid analysis in the time they proposed, it was impossible.
Which means these studies are either synthetic (created by modelling prior data sets gleaned by skimming your health data) or ghost written (written by Pharma employees with AI help).

In this case both of these things are likely to be true...
But @jennifercelane went along with it anyway. I have no idea what her contribution was but it looks like she was the "medic" front for a paper ghost written and produced by Pharma and @IQVIA_global who are the vaccine industry's data curators (or creators).
And here's the clincher.
This should have been a red flag to Jenny and @prieto_alhambra who was the supervising author.

You see, it's a simple fact that azithromycin isn't a treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Nor a long term treatment for anything in common use. Image
So it's just not possible that a third of the cohort taking hydroxychloroquine were also taking azithromycin long term.

Find a rheumatologist and ask them how many patients on HCQ they also treat with azithromycin.

Zero. It's not a treatment.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=azithrom…
Long-term azithromycin use is rare - bronchiectasis and other unusual indications. If it's used long term (I've never seen someone on it) it would be low dose, not the doses suggested in this paper.

We're talking less than 1:10,000 people
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=long-ter…
So the probability that one-third of a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients were also on long term azithromycin, when that is less than 1:10,000 people?

Zero.

I'm calling this paper fake until the data is available to public inspection...

"Patient level data not available". Image
So this paper must be assumed to be the 3rd in the #surgisphere #lancetgate scandal.

The 4th would have to be @bengoldacre's @OPENSAFELY paper in the @TheLancetRheum that is also not available to inspection.


All attempting to discredit #HCQpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33349815/
And all these papers (including the original #surgisphere papers) appear to have been ghost written, because it's not possible for the lead authors to do what they did in the time available.
And the real people that provided the health data have no idea that their data is being used to push a false Pharma narrative that is endangering them, and making billions for the pharma companies who then pump a few quid back into the institutions.

Bargain Basement Bribery
👆👆👆this is #EMRgate.

But this 👇👇👇 is just one thread of the back-story.

#surgisphere #surgisphere3 #EMRgate
@chrismartenson @FeeRedfern

Correction and apologies - @epic is not the twitter account of EPIC health care.... this was a typo.

Please feel free to remove your tag from the conversation as twitter doesn't let us edit or remove users from tweets
@chrismartenson @FeeRedfern BINGO and BOOM 💥💥💥

Here's your ghost writer.
Patrick Ryan of @OHDSI and @JanssenGlobal

The lead author should be the corresponding author.
If the corresponding author is not the lead author, it's because they don't want you asking questions of the lead author.
Image
Image
@chrismartenson @FeeRedfern @OHDSI @JanssenGlobal

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Oct 17
When "real world" data is this complete and the findings are too good to be true - contradicting those from the @CDCgov's own V-safe registry...

It's likely to be synthetic, until proven otherwise.

There is ZERO reason to restrict this data.
jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman… x.com/jsm2334/status…Image
BINGO.

In France in 2021 only 25% of women received a COVID vaccine during pregnancy and most of those were second trimester.

Therefore it's not possible that 25% of the French pregnancy registry received 1st trimester vaccination.

Image
Image
This is also strange.
The Quentin registry study shows a big jump in vaccination rate by age group but the Bernard study doesn't show the same.
This is more like what a synthetic data set might show based on assumed characteristics of the underlying data.

There are possible explanations for all of these anomalies, but this is the problem with secret registry data:
It's not credible when it conveniently matches a narrative and nobody is allowed to see it.

Bernard jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman…
Quentin registry
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
@franklin_reeder @chrismartensonImage
Read 7 tweets
Oct 15
I'm going to explain why this chart is so important and why @jsm2334 is being disingenuous by ignoring it - whilst making points that undermine the "real world vaccine data" industry.

It's a Kaplan-Meier curve and it obliterates Jeffrey's argument.

THREAD response🧵below Image
Just to go over it... the lines show what proportion of subjects (children) ended up without chronic disease up to 10 years after being studied.

It's called a survival analysis because it's used for cancer survival.

If the red line was a cancer drug it would be a blockbuster Image
It shows that by the end of the 10 year follow-up, of those that they could still follow up (who stayed in the study) 57% (100-43%) of vaccinated kids had chronic disease (e.g. asthma) and 17% (100-83%) of unvaccinated kids did.

A huge difference not explainable by chance. Image
Read 17 tweets
Oct 4
HOLY 🧀

The lead of the WHO steering committee - that stopped your elderly relative getting antibiotics for COVID - was Janet Diaz.

But Fiona Godlee, who lied about @DrAndyWakefield, and lied about the @bmj_latest being paid by Merck, was on the committee https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/be027488-3a45-4ba2-b413-6914d198714f/content
Janet Diaz was the person that led the #MAGICApp guideline committees that stopped your grandma getting antibiotics for her post-viral pneumonia, leading to her death.

But she did this with the help of @pervandvik who deleted his account

Image
Diaz here tells you that COVID kills you by an overreacting immune response, but that was never true.

She was an intensivist recruited by the WHO in 2018.

None of this was true, but it sold a LOT of drugs and killed a LOT of people
Read 7 tweets
Sep 26
Hey @Grok...

Which US govt organisation blew a hole in the ozone layer in 1958 by sending atomic bombs to the troposphere over the Antarctic in operation Argus - then blaming the resulting destruction of ozone on CFC's?

When was DARPA created?
nuke.fas.org/control/ctr/ne… x.com/grok/status/19…
Read 4 tweets
Sep 25
🚨THREAD:
At first glance this is a non-story as Moderna will claim that what they said was a mistake.

BUT @RWMaloneMD must know something as he states clearly that Pfizer manipulated the biodistribution images.

Why did they want to hide that it went to the ovaries?
👇👇 Image
It wasn't just Pfizer that hid the fact that the mRNA-LNP complex went to the ovaries (where it could not possibly provide its declared function in the lung).

Other "scientists" - acting on behalf of Pfizer - were mobilised to hide this scandal
arkmedic.info/p/whats-your-a…
The AMH drop (ovarian reserve) after vaccination was later shown by the Manniche paper after being denied by the Kate Clancy and Viki Males of the world.

mdpi.com/2076-393X/13/4…
Read 14 tweets
Sep 19
Laura Wilson of @tandfonline can either choose to uphold scientific integrity.

Or choose to be an accessory in the biggest securities fraud scandal of our time.

I wonder what she will choose.

@STMAssoc is sponsored by @Silverchairnews

@Kevin_McKernan
#pubpeergate Image
Image
Can you see how it works?

Institutes like the @STMAssoc get their money from the journals who get their money from pharma.

And Bill Gates.

All controlled by big money interests.

Laura has no chance.
Unless she blows the whistle to the @SECGov

But this time the Arnold foundation's @RetractionWatch have not only revealed with their "exclusive" that they were directly involved in trying to get this important paper retracted...

But are trying to make Wilson the fall guy.

stm-assoc.org/people/laura-w…Image
Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(