This is how it works.
Your hospital signs you up to an overseas EMR (health record) corporation.
They get your health data.
You get zip.
That data is used to generate artificial study data that promotes a drug, and Pharma makes $billions.
Here's an example. @addenbrookes hospital - one of the biggest hospitals in the country and a massive #BigPharma advocate...
Gives your health data to @epic.
What, you didn't know?
It's written in the T&C. Right at the bottom of a 4,400 word disclaimer.
Can't you see it?
Now comes the smart part.
Usually @NEJM or @thelancet are involved.
A noob medic comes along with a first author paper from a massive collaboration of people who don't know each other.
There are 14 data sources from different countries.
>900,000 patients.
Data amassed over 20 years up to the same year of the publication (therefore limited time for analysis).
Cleaning, matching, imputing this data would take 2 years+.
@chrismartenson
Yet we are expected to believe that an orthopaedic registrar with no prior publication record did this in a couple of months.
This is how we worked out that #surgisphere (#lancetgate) was fake.
Both @thelancet and @NEJM were involved, because they are simp journals for #BigPharma.
The study size prohibited any valid analysis in the time they proposed, it was impossible.
Which means these studies are either synthetic (created by modelling prior data sets gleaned by skimming your health data) or ghost written (written by Pharma employees with AI help).
In this case both of these things are likely to be true...
But @jennifercelane went along with it anyway. I have no idea what her contribution was but it looks like she was the "medic" front for a paper ghost written and produced by Pharma and @IQVIA_global who are the vaccine industry's data curators (or creators).
And here's the clincher.
This should have been a red flag to Jenny and @prieto_alhambra who was the supervising author.
You see, it's a simple fact that azithromycin isn't a treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Nor a long term treatment for anything in common use.
So it's just not possible that a third of the cohort taking hydroxychloroquine were also taking azithromycin long term.
Find a rheumatologist and ask them how many patients on HCQ they also treat with azithromycin.
Long-term azithromycin use is rare - bronchiectasis and other unusual indications. If it's used long term (I've never seen someone on it) it would be low dose, not the doses suggested in this paper.
So the probability that one-third of a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients were also on long term azithromycin, when that is less than 1:10,000 people?
Zero.
I'm calling this paper fake until the data is available to public inspection...
"Patient level data not available".
So this paper must be assumed to be the 3rd in the #surgisphere #lancetgate scandal.
The 4th would have to be @bengoldacre's @OPENSAFELY paper in the @TheLancetRheum that is also not available to inspection.
And all these papers (including the original #surgisphere papers) appear to have been ghost written, because it's not possible for the lead authors to do what they did in the time available.
And the real people that provided the health data have no idea that their data is being used to push a false Pharma narrative that is endangering them, and making billions for the pharma companies who then pump a few quid back into the institutions.
Bargain Basement Bribery
👆👆👆this is #EMRgate.
But this 👇👇👇 is just one thread of the back-story.
Correction and apologies - @epic is not the twitter account of EPIC health care.... this was a typo.
Please feel free to remove your tag from the conversation as twitter doesn't let us edit or remove users from tweets
@chrismartenson @FeeRedfern BINGO and BOOM 💥💥💥
Here's your ghost writer.
Patrick Ryan of @OHDSI and @JanssenGlobal
The lead author should be the corresponding author.
If the corresponding author is not the lead author, it's because they don't want you asking questions of the lead author.
The Pharma lobby group BIO admitting to using "conservative" lobby groups to attempt to oust @SecKennedy to keep the vaccine industry alive.
Important highlights:
⭐️Targeting @DrMakaryFDA to "rebuild FDA capacity"
⭐️Target @AEI via Scott Gottlieb and @DLA_Piper via Richard Burr
⭐️Help build trust in vaccines (what happened to the trust?)
⭐️Investors are leaving vaccine investment
⭐️Vaccines are the #1 priority at BIO
⭐️National security commission Biotech report a way in to sell product
⭐️$2m to be spent on "vaccine programs"
⭐️"More productive to target Makary and Trump Insiders vs RFK Jr"
Remember that BIO are the organisation that funded and organised the @shotsheard harassment group that target doctors for deregistration (e.g. @mdbreathe and @drcole12) if they publish genuine safety concerns about pharma products.
Links below.
Social media targeting, harassment and blackmail is absolutely securities fraud. law.justia.com/codes/us/2002/… and others
@SECGov @FBIDirectorKash do your job.
Remember that the BIO lobby group Shots Heard - which targeted doctors and scientists to blackmail them into silence over COVID vaccines - included people like Viki Male, Kevin Ault (ACIP), David Gorski and Dorit Reiss.
🚨THREAD:
The muttons descended on @MaryanneDemasi today, who I will show was correct in her report.
But first a reminder that Jon Laxton who led them is the front for the now defunct Project Halo and has never published a first author research paper on pubmed.
The claim made by the underqualified "Dr Jon" - and the muttons that descended on Dr Demasi - was that the study result was correct.
It was, in a way. But was fraudulently presented.
Here's the chart.
There were 37,909 babies given RSV monoclonals (which don't prevent death)
When assessing whether a vaccine works you can either perform a gold standard randomised controlled trial (RCT) or do a suboptimal study called a self control risk interval (SCRI) study, which is what happened here. It's recognised by the CDC.
The significance of yesterday's #Grokgate scandal cannot be understated.
Grok not only lied but lied about lying. Multiple times.
The reason it's so significant is that you are now going to enter a world of AI based medicine and it doesn't matter whether it's true or not, you better damn well take the drugs.
You see, when you lie about one thing to cover up another lie you can never be trusted in anything ever.
Grok fabricated a picture of a phone screen to show that a SpaceX rocket landing, which was fake footage, was real. That was to avoid the inevitable questions over where SpaceX money is going.
Do you want to live in a world where all your medical treatments are based on fabrications and hallucinations and the only thing that matters is that the corporations behind them keep getting paid?
Grok is that world.
Look at this picture which was fabricated by Grok earlier this year.
This is your next medical treatment. It will be as reliable as a SpaceX rocket.