Unfortunately, time and again, our needs have not been considered.
Clinically Vulnerable people have a 5.4x increased risk of Long Covid and an 8.5x increased risk of death (data from the final ONS Covid survey).
Withdrawing protections from schools has hit us hardest.
2/
Our increased risks, without any protections in place, make our lives more difficult and impact our children - even if they are attending school. It is a barrier to attendance and a barrier to learning.
3/
Many Clinically Vulnerable Families no longer feature in official attendance data, as they have been off-rolled, because schools and local authorities do not want their own data blighted.
4/
Clinically Vulnerable Families reject the incredibly distasteful title "Ghost Children".
Minimum estimates for Covid Orphans continue to grow.
Because by not protecting our children were are not protecting their households, families and communities.
6/
We have been collecting data,
We hope to share it with the Education Committee Inquiry into attendance, but we have yet to be invited to share our oral evidence.
Even winter pressures on healthcare affected our school attendance.
7/
All children are now frequently getting sick with Covid itself, as it remains in high prevalence year-round. This also has a direct impact on attendance figures.
Whilst some people may be asymptomatic, others can take a long time to recover - if they ever do...
8/
Children are developing post-viral conditions such as T1 diabetes which make them Clinically Vulnerable.
And highly vulnerable children are now locked out of high demand special schools due to a shortfall in provision.
However, there is something they could do...
9/
And it isn't recycling the old "Schools Bill" to crack down harder on struggling parents.
Because fines, prosecutions, social services referrals, and school attendance orders are blunt instruments, which only make matters worse and won't fix our problem.
10/
All we are asking for is a safe learning environment. It is a very simple and basic request.
Because even those who are in school are struggling. How can children learn or perform when 'personal responsibility' means that they are constantly managing risk?
11/
💙 We want to *live* with Covid
💜 #educationANDlives are essentials
💗 Everyone needs safe schools
Let's invest in health. Air filtration can reduce the risks for everyone.
By reducing Covid, 'flu, Strep A. & RSV we improve pupil & staff attendance and community health.
12/
Join us in the unmentionable place to find the most supportive community and to contribute to our attendance survey:
Search for : Clinically Vulnerable Families
Additionally, please complete the DfE survey requesting evidence on children missing from education.
The government just published its Pandemic Preparedness Strategy.
TLDR: Some welcome commitments inc. on ventilation. But Clinically Vulnerable people are still not clearly defined or automatically protected, and the prioritisation framework won't arrive until 2027.
1/🧵
What's new?
Published 25 March 2026, this is the UK's first major pandemic strategy since Covid.
It covers all 4 nations, sets out 12 principles and detailed action plans to 2030, backed by around £1 billion of investment.
But what about the detail...?
2/
They know another pandemic is coming... and epidemics are also a risk.
The question is:
Will Clinically Vulnerable families be protected when it does?
- This document raises the question more than it answers it.
⚠️East Kent Trust failed to report their first case for 2 days⚠️
Here's what you need to know.
TLDR: Peaked 13th March. No new cases since - with reporting delays, but that's even better news than it sounds.
1/🧵 👇 @laurabundock @SkyNews
THE OUTBREAK IS DECLINING but understates how well that's going. 📉
The earliest case became unwell on 9th March, with the latest on 16th March, and the peak was 13th March.
2/
Cases take time to be confirmed and reported.
The fact that nothing new has surfaced in the data as of 23rd March - despite the reporting lag - means the real-world situation is almost certainly better than the numbers show.
Meningitis
* Important thread for those who prefer balanced and factual information *
In order to understand risk we need to break down a few things....
🦠Risk from the bacteria
💙💜💗 Individual risk
🎓 Environmental risks 1/
The Kent outbreak is predominantly MenB (Group B). This is a serious infection - and potentially an adapted strain - investigations are ongoing...
Bacterial meningitis is rare but more severe than viral, and up to 1 in 10 cases of bacterial meningitis in the UK is fatal.
2/
MenB isn't new. There are around 300 cases of MenB per year in the UK, even with vaccination programmes.
What's unusual is the cluster - multiple cases linked to a single location in a short window. It has now spread to a student at a second university in Canterbury, Kent. 3/
UK COVID INQUIRY - CVF💙💜💗
@AdamWagner1 Closing Submissions
The Covid Inquiry has good ventilation protocols (as advised by CVF at the start of the Inquiry) including HEPA filters.
Under 1000ppm is therefore the safe threshold ( but without it would be under 800ppm).
1/
We need to understand airborne transmission in order to make all indoor environments safer for everyone, and especially for Clinically Vulnerable people.
2/
The need for Clinically Vulnerable people to have:
This week saw CVF's evidence & organisations representing: disability, domestic abuse, faith, migrants, homeless, prisons, local government.
Expert evidence focused on: later life, LGBTQ+, race and gender inequalities (Dr Clare Wenham, below)
1/
EXPERT RACIAL INEQUALITIES
Prof Laia Bécares discussed the risks in multigenerational households where there were keyworkers and children in schools.
2/
EXPERT LATER LIFE
Prof @JamesNazroo
CVF were concerned that many older people, who were at high risk, were not supported to shield - which included advice on how to stay safe, as well as food deliveries and community outreach.
Clean air matters - especially for #ClinicallyVulnerable children, staff and families. This is an important recognition that airborne transmission is preventable.
1/
But the proposed CO₂ thresholds are too high. 800ppm should be the upper limit - not 1500ppm. By 1500ppm, air is already significantly rebreathed. That’s not a precautionary standard for children, let alone those at higher risk.
If we’ve learned anything from the pandemic, it’s that minimum compliance is not the same as safety. #ClinicallyVulnerable pupils cannot “choose” lower exposure if the baseline standard is poor.
3/