"They naturally extract CO2 from the air and use it as feed. The more CO2 plants absorb, the less CO2 remains trapped in the atmosphere." 2/6
As plants decompose, CO2
is released back to the air
"If left alone, plants are eaten by other organisms and releasing the carbon back to the carbon cycle within months."
3/6
Anoxic conditions slow decomposition
"In anoxic waters, plants decompose extremely slowly, effectively storing the carbon much longer." 4/6
The Black Sea is the ideal location
"It is the largest anoxic body of water on earth, 2km deep, surrounded by fertile lands. The Black Sea is the optimal environment allowing affordable, environmentally safe, gigaton scale #CarbonRemoval in this decade." 5/6
🚨 The Royal Society has published a new briefing today finding that techniques to reflect a small portion of sunlight back into space (#SRM) could help lower global temperatures if deployed worldwide, but cannot replace emissions cuts or fully address climate impacts.
🧵1/7
2/ ➝ The report reviews solar radiation modification (#SRM) approaches, including stratospheric aerosol injection (#SAI) and marine cloud brightening (#MCB), outlining their potential to temporarily reduce warming and associated risks.
3/ ➝ It notes that SRM would only mask the effects of GHG emissions and would not address issues such as ocean acidification.
🚨🌲 New research reveals that even intact boreal forests, some of the planet’s strongest natural carbon sinks, lose their ability to absorb CO₂ as they age.
Here’s what the scientists found & why it matters for our climate models🧵1/9 #CarbonSink #CarbonRemoval
2/ Boreal forests cover vast regions across Canada, Russia, and Scandinavia and store enormous amounts of carbon in trees and soil.
They’re often seen as stable, long-term carbon sinks, but this study challenges that assumption with new global-scale data.
3/ Using seven global Net Ecosystem Productivity (NEP) datasets and a high-resolution forest age map, researchers tracked how C uptake changes as forests grow older.
They used a space-for-time substitution method, comparing forests of different ages to infer long-term trends.
🚨A major 6-country survey (N=5,310) finds Europeans support -ve emissions to meet climate goals, but strongly prefer nature-based solutions like afforestation over engineered options like Direct Air Capture. Trust hinges on benefits for nature & future generations.
🧵1/10 #CDR
2/ When allocating how to tackle emissions, respondents clearly prioritized immediate mitigation:
🚨A new study warns that efforts to cool the planet through stratospheric aerosol injection (#SAI) could face far greater challenges than models predict, from unpredictable monsoon shifts to material shortages & engineering limits, every step adds new risks.
🧵1/8 #SRM
2/ The authors explore both micro-level (engineering) and macro-level (governance & supply) factors that could restrict feasible deployment.
Key finding: these constraints could drastically raise costs, risks, and uncertainty, especially for “solid” (non-sulfate) aerosols.
3/ Traditional SAI uses sulfate aerosols (like volcanoes).
But alternatives, CaCO₃, TiO₂, Al₂O₃, ZrO₂, even diamond, promise less ozone damage.
Yet producing, aerosolizing, and dispersing these solids in submicron form is technically daunting.