Alamgir Mosque, built by pulling down one of the most sacred Vishnu temples of Kashi i.e. Bindu Madhav temple. The temple was built by Rajput Maharaja Man Singh of Amer. The temple was so grand as described by French traveller Tavernier that the idol was 5-6 feet high and was
garlanded with Gold, Rubies, Pearls and Emeralds. It was the most impressive sight on Banaras riverfront with four great towers on four of its corner and a lofty Shikhar rising over the sanctum. Tulsi das in whose age this temple was built praised it in many of his poems.
The temple was destroyed by Aurangzeb just years after Tavernier saw it and to match the grandeur of the former temple, he built this lofty mosque over the site. In words of later colonial writers, the Alamgir's mosque completely dominated this otherwise Hindu city.
But the lofty towers built to match the grandeur of the temple couldn't live long, due to safety issue, the British cut both minaret in half, and even later one of the minaret still fell, then the other one was further truncated, which gives it today's look. Meanwhile
the Bindu Madhav temple was shifted to a nearby small and inconspicuous house in the shadows of this mosque where the lord is still worshipped.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is another perspective which no "historian" wants to talk about. There is too much controversy regarding Mughal-Rajput marriages mostly ignored by mainstream or are unaware. Mundiyar ri khyat says that "Jodhabai" of Jodhpur married to Jahangir was daughter of a concubine.
In Jodhpur rajya ki khyat, it is mentioned that a concubine's (पातर) daughter was married to Akbar.
There is great numbers of controversies reg mothers of Jahangir and Shah Jahan. And many historians argue and doubt Akbar's marriage with Bharmal's daughter or support concubine angle.
Demystifying the tale of so called "British-Jat war and invincibility of Lohagarh fort of Bharatpur". The siege of Bharatpur by British commander Gerard Lake in 1805 is mythified in so many legends, modern newspaper and social media article that it is universally believed as
victory of Jats against the British. Even wikipedia articles mention it as such. Hence it is necessary to demystify the whole event, step by step which is missing in all these abovementioned narratives.
So the story starts in 1803. Jat Raja of Bharatpur, Ranjit Singh seeing British succeeding against Sindhia, sent a friendly overture to Lord Lake, and later personally went to meet Lord Gerard Lake in his camp. Soon a treaty was signed by Bharatpur with British.
While neighbouring Bengal was under Íslamic rule for centuries, it would be surprise for some people that Orissa till mid 16th century had not a single muslím living in its territory. It was soon to be changed.
Bengal was then ruled by an Afghans. The afghans of Bengal were not in friendly relations with Mughal emperor Akbar. In Orissa, the remnants of what was once mighty Gajapati empire was on its last leg due to internal problems.
The Ruler of Orissa already accepted nominal Mughal suzerainty and gave asylum to some Afghan rebel of Bengal but since they were friendly with Akbar, Afghans couldnt do anything about it. The Afghan ruler Sulaiman got an opportunity when Akbar was busy with siege of Chittor.
Tomar clan of Rajputs is quite an old one, see below mention of Tomaras in Itihasa-Purana texts.
In Bhishma Parva of Mahabharata, Sanjay describing country of Bharat to Dhritrashtra and mentions Tomaras as one of the peoples living in north and eastern part of the country.
In Matsya Purana, description of a river passing from country of Tomaras.
Kalhana's Rajatarangini composed in year 1150 while describing the downfall of King Harsha tells how because of his misdeeds Harsha was abandoned by everyone including the Rajaputras. Although Rajaputras are praised a lot by Kalhana but at this instant he kind of scornfully
tells how the Rajaputras who claim descent from 36 Kul and even consider themselves at a position higher than the sun itself, finally abandon Harsha. (Harsha by the way was a controversial king)
At another instance, when Harsha's grandfather Anantadeva (reign:1028-1068) was ruling. King calls his son, the prince Kalasha and slaps him, at that time Rajaputra Bijja was with the prince. Although the prince was frightened of his father, but Bijja
A thread: Pakistani newspaper Dawn's front pages from 4th december 1971 to 20 December to see how they kept their own people in the dark. This was on 4th december, after the commencement of war on 3rd december.