2. Big Disinformation has policies to ban ”true content” on COVID-19 vaccines. Simultaneously, social media police "vaccine misinformation" while Big Pharma pays them hundreds of millions of dollars for advertising.
3. In late 2021, I published a blockbuster BMJ investigation on corruption in Pfizer's COVID-19 clinical trial. @IamBrookJackson provided The BMJ dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails.
4. @IamBrookJackson repeatedly notified her company of failings and then reported this to the FDA, which never investigated.
Here's a company email some days before Jackson noticed FDA--her company was in a panic. "THE FDA IS COMING SOON"
5. Jackson's company started lying to reporters, saying she was never on the Pfizer Clinical trial. But we had internal emails proving she was.
This email is for a "clean up call" to fix data on Pfizer's trial. Just one example. We also had secret recordings.
6. This investigation was the most highly cited science publication of 2021, and the second highest ever by Altmetric.
I was also a finalist for a journalism prize.
7. Some weeks after it appeared, Australia's government started demanding answers from Pfizer. That same day, a Facebook "fact checker" called LeadStories started censoring the article.
8. BMJ sent Mark Zuckerberg an open letter calling his company’s fact check “inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible.”
Articles in other outlets began calling out Facebook and LeadStories for censorship and incompetence.
9. I later told @mtaibbi: "They’re not fact checking facts. What they’re doing is checking narratives. They can’t say that your facts are wrong, so it’s like, 'Aha, there’s no context.' Or, 'It’s misleading.' But that’s not a fact check. You just don’t like the story."
10. Some months back, documents became public from a lawsuit by Attorney's General suing the Biden Administration for censoring Americans by proxy--colluding w/ social media companies to throttle speech.
Here' the Free Speech Clause of the 1st Amendment
11. This documents shows that months before BMJ published my investigation, Facebook cut a deal with the Biden White House to limit "true content" on vaccines.
This is exactly what Facebook's "fact checker" LeadStories did.
12. #TwitterFiles show that the Stanford Virality Project was doing the same thing, while advising Twitter, taking action on "true posts which could fuel hesitancy."
Basically, truth the conflicted w/ Biden administration policy.
13. NEW #TWITTERFILE Sure enough, Twitter flagged my BMJ investigation, when #Pfizergate started trending.
14. Twitter reviewed the tweets and decided to not take any action. But they would continue to monitor it.
"Should the rhetoric change, please let us know and we will review again."
Again, these tweets were true.
15. This #TwitterFile shows that Twitter began working with their client J&J on "messaging strategy" to sell their COVID-19 vaccine.
QUESTION: How Twitter be trusted to call out "vaccine misinformation" when J&J is paying them to market their vaccine?
16. QUESTION: How many vaccine clients does Facebook, Youtube, Instagram, and other social media companies have, and how much are these companies paying them?
17. Washington Post reported in March 2020 that pharmaceutical and health-care brands spent nearly $1 billion just on Facebook mobile ads.
Top 5 pharma advertisers spent $152 million in US on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter in 2020. Pfizer was the top spender at $55 million.
1) I'm on vacay and have gotten several calls from Hill staff and Trump officials about this @emilyakopp "exclusive" that repeats old stories--some OTHERS broke.
One IC official told me, "There's nothing new. This is just sleazy."
Emily has done this numerous times before; let's review
@Dylan_Housman
@_EricLieberman_
@VinceCoglianese
@JohnCFLoftus1
@DailyCaller
@SenJoniErnst
@tuckercarlson
@robbysoave
@RisingTheHill
@CarlHigbie
@lizlyons47
@ianmSC
@paulsperry_
#KOPPyKAT
2) EXAMPLE 1
Emily Kopp "exclusive" first reported by @SharriMarkson
#KOPPyKAT
3) EXAMPLE 1
Sharri Markson broke this story a few months back in 2021.
1) NIH Director released new priorities for national research. I was leaked a copy of document. Follow along.
"To rebuild public trust, NIH is enhancing oversight of funded research abroad and reinforcing its commitment to responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars."
2) DEI and affirmative action are out and replication in research is in.
3) A strategic plan on AI is coming.
Lots more nutrition research, it appears, with focus on long term studies to ID good and bad diets, starting before birth.
Max Koslov and the #sciomm writers at @Nature continue putting out fake news and propaganda. Koslov's publisher Springer Nature won't say if they got a DOJ letter from @EagleEdMartin, but I published that letter to Springer Nature a month ago.
Koslov just can't do journalism.
2) Here's the letter DOJ sent to Springer Nature's journal Nature Medicine, which published the corrupt "Proximal Origin" paper.
1) Trump administration has pivoted to investigate the much ballyhooed "Proximal Origin" paper by @scrippsresearch Kristian Andersen.
Read DOJ's letter to @NatureMedicine. Trump officials believe the paper was a quid pro quo for a Fauci grant. tinyurl.com/ykr7vxpv
2) Suspicions have long dogged this study, as emails have found the authors ran it past funders Tony Fauci and Francis Collins at the NIH, as well as @JeremyFarrar when he was at the Wellcome Trust.
In one email, Kristian Andersen praised them for "advice and leadership."
3) When Nature Medicine published the paper, editor in chief Joaa Monteiro claimed the paper “put conspiracy theories” about the pandemic’s possible lab origin to rest.
Is labelling an alternative hypothesis a "conspiracy theory" normal in science?
1) @ScienceMagazine interviewed @NIHDirector_Jay and then pretended he lied to them in the interview, kicking of a storm on #Bluesky.
I'm releasing the entire interview and a transcript.
The behavior is appalling, not the first time Science has been caught in unethical acts.
2) @AshleyRindsberg released a story for @tabletmag w/ emails catching @sciencemagazine Jon Cohen in salacious behavior. tinyurl.com/yrtjp5dw
3) In this case, Science Magazine claimed in two stories that Bhattacharya dismissed a Nature article "that NIH planned to suspend subawards for foreign collaborators"