Crémieux Profile picture
May 21 10 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Changes to the Bar exam so far don't seem to have made a dent in the race differences in performance on it.

How large are these differences? In the latest year, 2022, the Black-White gap in California Bar pass rates was 0.97 SDs.

And this matters because we expect a threshold Image
to practice (the Bar exam) to reduce subsequent performance gaps.

But how much should those gaps be reduced?

Let's simulate to find out!

@_twolfram recently provided an estimate for British lawyers' IQs of 110.31: sciencedirect.com/science/articl….

Let's go ahead and assume
there's a threshold that's 0.67 SDs (10 points) above the higher-performing of two groups with equal variances who are separated by 0.97 d.

With simulated group sizes of one million persons each, the mean differences decline, and the SDs do too. The new gap is 0.412 d. Image
But we know that the 0.97 d gap is an underestimate due to range restriction.

Using MBE scores, it looks like the unrestricted gap should be more like 1.22 d. That leaves us with a 0.537 d gap above the threshold.

Do we have subsequent performance measures?

Yes! We have three:
- Complaints made against attorneys
- Probations
- Disbarments

For men, the gaps, in order, are 0.576, 0.513, and 0.564 d. For women, the gaps are 0.576, 0.286, and 0.286 d.

Men fit expectations and women apparently needed less discipline. Source: https://board.calba...
These gaps probably replicate nationally.

For example, here are Texas pass rates from 2004 - a 0.961 d Black-White first-pass gap. The 2006 update to these figures raised the gap to 0.969 d. Source: https://ble.texas.g...Image
Those figures are basically in line with LSAC's national study of Bar exam pass rates. Image
And those are basically in line with New York's gaps. Image
And this should probably be expected, since tests measure the same things. Image
Since all of the people included in these statistics went to ABA-accredited schools, they all had the opportunity to learn what was required to perform well on these tests.

But just like the Step examinations for medical doctors, the gaps on the tests and in real life remain.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Crémieux

Crémieux Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cremieuxrecueil

May 22
A recent paper addressed the causality of this relationship with a set of interesting instrumental variables.

They used

- Cranial capacity
- Ancestry-adjusted UV radiation
- Numeracy in the 19th century

Here's what they found: national IQ differences affect growth rates. Image
The smarter the country's population, the faster the economy tends to grow.

You can use modern national IQ estimates to show this, or you can get similar estimates based on the sizes of those population's brains, a proxy for state history (UVR/distance from equator), or their
numeracy in the 19th-century.

It only takes a look at growth chart updates to see there's not major reverse causality between growth and cranial capacity, nor can there be with numeracy two centuries ago, and obviously UVR isn't caused by growth.

Smarts matter a lot.
Read 4 tweets
May 22
Let's check this out with some public datasets

- High School and Beyond (1980)
- The National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988
- The Education Longitudinal Study of 2002

First, the odds of obtaining a bachelor's degree, controlling for test scores (educational achievement). Image
Second, the odds of working in a prestigious occupation, controlling for test scores. Image
Third, household income (HSB/ELS) and personal income (NELS:88).

For this outcome, it appeared there were some bad differences that remained, but only for household income. Follow-up lengths here were 11 years, 11 years, and 9 years, so incomes were still somewhat unstable. Image
Read 4 tweets
May 21
In light of findings from genome-wide association studies, I do not consider generally improved self-control to be an unsurprising side effect of Ozempic.

Consider this: BMI-related genes are primarily expressed in the brain and CNS rather than through hormones or digestion. Source: https://www.nature....
But we can be more specific: BMI-related gene expression is relatively extreme in the insula and the substantia nigra.

So what? Well, two things. Source: https://www.nature....
First, you may know the insula as the "hidden island of addiction".

There's a lot of human research on the role of the insula in cocaine, heroin, and cigarette addiction, and recently, in obesity. Because it's mostly not causally informative, I'm going to stick to animal models. Link: https://www.cell.com/...
Read 14 tweets
May 20
I've noticed a lot of people misinterpreting these sorts of graphs to mean that underperforming groups must be receiving some form of affirmative action

That may not be what they show. They primarily show two things

- Regression to the mean
- Threshold selection

Consider this: Image
If you have two groups with different means for variable X and you have a threshold for the level of X to get into a classification, the group with more people further out from that threshold will have a higher mean beyond it.

This is purely statistical.
But you see a similar pattern for groups stratified by their parents' education and income levels. This is because of two things.

First, parental SES is not a strong cause. The causal part of the relationship between it and kids' IQs is overstated.

Data:
Read 24 tweets
May 19
Everyone posts this picture, and it is compelling, but in this thread, I'm going to post replications. Check alt-texts for sources.

This is basically a graph repository.

I'll start with the SAT.

The picture posted by @monitoringbias is from the 2008 administration of the SAT. Source 1: https://www.jstor...
The results were the same in 1995. Source: http://www.lagriffe...
The results were the same in 2003. Source: https://journals.sa...
Read 26 tweets
May 18
I have officially had a Twitter account for two months. I'm thankful for all 14,100 of you who are following me.

Once @elonmusk approves me for subscriptions, you'll be able to subscribe to

- DM me
- See subscriber-only posts including long posts and summary posts

Review time:
Gender-affirming care has really taken off.

The social class of your parents is less related to your IQ than the social class you attain.

Read 207 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(