Thread by @PatriotsControl

I have finally gotten around to writing this thread about the evils of feminism – all waves of them, including the first. Especially the first.

How many times have you heard men and women in conservative circles proclaim:
‘Modern-day feminism has gone way too far. It’s no longer a legitimate struggle for the female right to vote.’

Or words to that effect. Well, I’m here to tell you that in western societies women have never been oppressed, were always put on a pedestal and that feminism is a Marxist creation to destroy the family unit,

the most important unit mankind has ever known, and by extension the entire fabric of society.
It al started in the mid 1900’s with the suffragette movement.

Common accepted knowledge is that this first wave of feminism was about women’s right to vote. After all, “suffrage” means the right to vote.
But where did this movement originate? With ordinary disenfranchised lower-class housewives?

No, it came from upper-class women and it was all about… property rights. You see, back in the day voting rights were extended only to people who owned mansions and land, male or female.

If a woman was married to a wealthy landowner she would not automatically enjoy co-ownership of her husband’s property, as it was the male who had generated the wealth, not the female.

Thus the first feminist struggle was for the legal entitlement of single women to the property and wealth of their ex-husbands after divorce or death, as well as the right women to co-own property and wealth during marriage.

It just so happened that with that property came voting rights and therefore societal power and influence.
I am already getting serious gold digger vibes. And you?

Was this really a struggle of oppressed working-class women or of selfish, materialistic and power-hungry noblewomen?

If this was truly a civil struggle against oppression, how come these women didn’t have a care in the world about the 6 out of 10 men who were also denied voting rights because they didn’t own property?

And have you ever heard about the White Feather Girls? These women publicly shamed men into enlisting and fighting and dying in the trenches during the Great War (1914-1918) by sticking a white feather onto their jackets.

Apparently, the “equality” these women sought did not apply to the equal right to fight and perish in a war, that was still a man’s job and men were expendable.

Those that did survive the horrors of war very often received a so-called Dear John letter, in which women whose freedom these men were out to defend notified their husbands or boyfriends they had moved on to another guy. More gold digger vibes right there.

To this day, no feminist has ever fought for the right to be drafted into war. They can now join the army, yes, but very few make it to the front in foreign wars, because whaddayaknow they get pregnant all of a sudden.

It’s like breaking the so-called “glass ceiling” to get cushy, airconditioned office jobs with lots of power, but making no efforts whatsoever to do anything about the “glass basement” to pick up trash or build roads or do any other kind of heavy lifting.

Women have always been the privileged class, at least here in the West.
But there’s a darker, more sinister side to the first wave of feminism. What the history books very often neglect to mention is that public shaming is not the worst these women did to men.

Violence and even terrorism was also involved, including bombings. This whole movement was radicalized from the get-go.
And then there’s Margaret Sanger, another well-to-do and very evil woman who became highly influential in the movement.

Sanger had obvious ties to the eugenics movement. That’s right, the very movement that spawned Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, George Soros, Henry Kissinger and all the evil characters behind (world) wars and, most recently, the vaccine rollout in order to depopulate the planet.

The American eugenics movement was much revered by Adolf Hitler, who based his “racial hygiene” policies on this doctrine and who was bankrolled by American industrialists and politicians, including none other than Henry Ford and Prescott Bush, Dubya’s granddaddy.

Margaret Sanger was a proponent of social Darwinism. It’s a little-known fact that Darwin himself considered black people to be inferior human beings.

In fact, the now accepted (but faulty) theory that man descended from apes in the mind of Charles Darwin originally held that only BLACK people descended from apes.

In the 1900’s and even the early 20th century it was very common to see black people displayed at zoos and traveling circuses in a cage, sometimes together with apes.

Social Darwinism was about exterminating “unwanted” segments of the population, including freed black slaves that had moved from Southern plantations to work in factories in the North.

Margaret Sanger wanted to prevent this former slave population from generating offspring and therefore founded Planned Parenthood, the world’s first abortion clinics. To this day, the majority of Planned Parenthood clinics can be found in poor black neighborhoods.

Abortion has long been heralded as a “woman’s right to choose” and has taken a worldwide toll of no less than ONE FOURTH of all pregnancies. History will look back on these satanic child sacrifices in horror and shame.

A society that does not take care of its children has no future.
And who do you think considers Margaret Sanger to be one of her examples? None other than Hillary Clinton.

By now it should be obvious that we are dealing with an elitist depopulation plot. And this is just the FIRST feminist wave we’re talking about here, which many on the right consider to be the “good” feminist wave.

Other goals behind feminism were to have women join the workforce so they could be taxed.

An intended side effect was to disparage stay-at-home motherhood and have children at a very early age raised by surrogate mothers in daycare centers.

No-fault divorce was implemented, as well as welfare for single mothers and gender quota, thus eliminating the father as a protector, provider and defender of his family. As women’s influence grew, society became increasingly feminized.

The nuclear family has become all but destroyed and decadence runs rampant, as has been the case with all successful civilizations in their latter stage in the past.

Was this really a “civil rights” movement or just another evil elitist ploy to weaken and divide western nation states? Did you know that second-wave feminist Gloria Steinem admittedly worked for the CIA?

Also, watch this YouTube video I made in 2018 about the female flagbearers of cultural Marxism:



Can western society return to a healthy patriarchy and rid itself of toxic femininity? I believe it can. Here’s my plan:

First of all, restore a merit-based system with equality of opportunity and not outcome. This is paramount. Sure, some women may actually qualify to be in a leadership position (and they are more than welcome), but most of them won’t.

Women are collectivist followers, not individual leaders. But hey, it’s equality, right? Just not the type of equality women like to hide behind, which grants them all sorts of privileges. Now they will actually need to have skills and talents to show for it.

With fewer opportunities available to them, based on their innate capabilities (which don’t hold a candle to those of men), many women will then choose to leave the workplace, get married, start a family and depend on their husbands again as the sole provider.

No need to abolish female jobs, just no more gender quota and other insane state-enforced privileges.
Secondly, introduce a merit-based system to stop women (and weak men) voting socialist goons into office.

Let’s restrict the right to vote to those, male or female, who contribute to and serve their country either economically or militarily. Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.

Why should welfare queens, basement dwellers and convicts have voting rights anyway? No rights without responsibilities.

Since women don’t like taking responsibility, they will drop out of the workforce and military en masse and start baking blueberry pies instead, thus giving up the right to vote. We’ll call it “fair inequality”, how about that?

This should level the playing field considerably. Those women (most likely tomboys with testosterone) willing to put in the extra hours and prove their worth will stay on.

Those that fail miserably at performing their duties and tasks (which is most of them) will either get fired or quit on their own accord.

It literally won’t pay off anymore to be a “strong and independent” female – especially since there’s no welfare system to fall back on, thus forcing women to rely on their husbands once more. Welfare is the life blood of feminism, so let’s choke it at the source.

Furthermore, put an end to legalized abortion, so women will actually face consequences for irresponsible sex. Lastly, take divorce proceedings out of the family court system and place it under contract law.

Breaking up a marriage will then be equal to breaching a business agreement, for which you need to be able to produce factual proof. No more false rape and DV accusations. Custody should be awarded to those that are economically viable to provide for the kids (i.e. men).

No more single moms and feminization of boys.
If we do this right we can close off all avenues and they won’t even know what hit them. Just use the words “fair” and “equal” a lot and appeal to their collectivism by emphasizing the good of the nation.

To save face, the new feminism will be about women choosing to become homemakers themselves, which “conservative” feminist leaders will call “empowering” and a “women’s right.

There’s no such thing as a truly conservative or right-wing female, but once the societal tide turns they will go with the flow, as they’ve always done. Women don’t make decisions based on a sense of duty or loyalty – those are male values.

Women are self-serving, materialistic and hypergamous, so take away all their incentives and sell it as “fairness” and “equality” and they will voluntarily give up voting rights and become wives and mothers again.

There are already signs that this is indeed becoming the new feminism:



True girl power!

@threadreaderapp please unroll