Am drafting my article now on the trial court judge's second dismissal of Kari Lake's election contest. He wisely didn't cite the standard the defense used, which he'd appeared to state in his original order setting up the trial, because the Arizona Supreme Court would have never… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Here's the standard from Reyes - In Reyes, the Arizona Court of Appeals did not state that there must be zero signature verification that took place in order to overturn the election. The court said that where “almost one-third of the ballots cast counted without compliance with… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Utterly devastating testimony in Kari Lake's trial today by Maricopa County Level 1 signature reviewer Andy Meyers. He said the Level 2 reviewers wouldn't even bother reviewing the signatures when they got too busy. He also said there weren't enough Level 2 reviewers.
He said only about 1/10 of the signatures that should have been rejected were. There should have been 12,000 rejected out of 60,000 a day, but only 800-1,000 were.
He said despite the volume of signatures to verify doubled in the general after the primary, the county didn't make any changes to accommodate the increase in work. “I told my wife I was going to be working weekends because of the volume, but nothing happened.”
Attorney Alexis Danneman, who works for leftist Perkins Coie, is arguing against Abe Hamadeh at his election contest hearing that the statutes don't allow for his efforts challenging the election. Bwahahahaha you can't make this stuff up.
She's now saying if Abe Hamadeh is allowed to inspect the ballots, then he says it would "probably change the results" which is "speculative." Bwahahahah he's not saying it would probably change the results, that's a lie; he's CERTAIN it will change the results.
She's so awful. She goes, “They had a trial, they had an opportunity to put on their case.” Wow. Just ignores the fact Katie Hobbs withheld undercounted ballots in Pinal County from that trial! Frankly embarrassing hearing an attorney argue that.
I have a bombshell article coming out at The Arizona Sun Times tomorrow regarding last year's bogus election in Arizona. My mind is still reeling from what I just found out. This is one of those legendary things we'll be citing for years. Won't be easy for the left to refute.
I will say this, based on what I know about election fraud at this point, the only way these gutless wonders we have for judges (and I say this with my dad as a retired judge) are ever going to say there’s evidence is if multiple operatives admit they were paid to fix elections.
Just wanted to let everyone know the article is scheduled to come out at 10:30 am EST tomorrow (it's required to be embargoed until then) and will tweet it then too. To ME, it's extremely convincing evidence that Lake, Hamadeh and Finchem won, but it's not court of law evidence.
And here's my write-up about the explosive testimony Thursday to the Arizona Legislature alleging racketeering involving a cartel, Arizona officials, judges, election fraud and hacking Maricopa County databases. Guess what? I'd heard about this for years. arizonasuntimes.com/2023/02/25/exp…
Many of the Maricopa County Supervisors over the years have been in the real estate business, particularly developers and homebuilders. When I was at MCAO, we tried to prosecute one of them - phoenixnewtimes.com/news/before-do… But the system was so corrupt he destroyed us instead.....
I wrote about how they turned it around on us and destroyed our law licenses uncoverdc.com/2023/01/03/mar…. So when people say "let's file a racketeering complaint against them!" I respond and say we did that, and look what happened to us. The left controls the Bar and the legal system