In the appeal arguments over the disbarment trial of John Eastman, the California bar's attorney is already starting out with obvious lies. She said that Eastman said there was fraud in the 2020 election. The left loves to use that word because it's very difficult to prove the elements of fraud. The reality is Eastman was concerned laws were broken, wrongdoing, corruption etc. See how they have to lie to get anywhere?
---
Respondent made repeated and intentional false statements to the courts, the media and the microphone closer to you, and just that, during your whole oral argument, I'll start again. Respondent made repeated and intentional false statements to the courts the media and Vice President Pence that the 2020, presidential election had been stolen from Trump as a candidate who was his client through outcomes of terminative fraud, and that there were legally valid Trump electors available to stop this deal. These lies were part of a coordinated plan with Trump to deceive Vice President Pence into believing that he had both a factual basis and the legal authority to unilaterally stop the electoral count. Respondent knew that his statistical evidence was not evidence of fraud. He knew that his so called experts had no experience in elections, and he knew that their voter record numbers were wrong. He knew that there were no dual slate of electors because no state legislature had acted to certify a second slate, and he knew the president of the Senate did not have the power to reject certified electors or delay the counting of their votes. The whole point was to create the illusion of fraud, of active litigation and of multiple slaves of electors in order to convince pence to discard or delay the counting of electoral votes. He did not care whether the lawsuits were successful. He did not even know what was going on in Arizona, Nevada or New Mexico. But that did not keep him from recommending to Vice President to not count for their electoral votes, and he also didn't want his vetted by anyone. He knew that no court would ever say that the Vice President would have the authority to reject votes. And he also exploited his knowledge of President Trump's personality in order to bring in my voice to conspiracy. And basically, when you look at the six page memo, responded, effectively confesses that he's willing to cheat. That's why he says we're no longer playing by meeting their rules. Therefore, now his actions, the whole point of the conspiracy was to delay or stop the counting of the electoral votes. His actions culminated in the events of January 6, where he, working in concert with President Trump, told the same repeated lies about the factual basis for a stolen election, and he told the same lies about the Vice President having unilateral authority to reject the vote, and these misrepresentations in that volatile environment, naturally and foreseeably contributed to the harm that occurred on January 6. The whole point of this conspiracy was to delay the electoral count, and that's exactly what they did on January 6, but because all of the other efforts had failed. He turned to the crowd, in order to use them to do that. In the appeal arguments over the disbarment trial of John Eastman, the California bar's attorney is comparing his behavior to that of a woman who took the bar exam for her husband, stating it's similar harm. Disgusting.

Live oral arguments now starting in the DC Bar disciplinary proceedings against Trump's former official Jeffrey Clark. A board has issued a preliminary recommendation suspending his license, which he is objecting to. He is being disciplined for merely drafting a letter that was never sent to Georgia officials advising them of their actions after the botched 2020 presidential election.

Watch now - youtube.com/watch?v=kG0sHj… The attorney for the DC Bar just referred to the letter Jeffrey Clark drafted re the 2020 election that was never even sent as a "false letter." 🤡🤡🤡🤡One of the attorneys on the disciplinary board wasn't even buying it, she responded that the attorneys ethics rules don't prohibit attorneys from disagreeing with their superiors.

In the disbarment trial of Trump's former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark, operational security expert Harry Houry said risk limiting audits look at whether the counts and registration of precinct tickets and ballots seem to be accurate. But they don’t look at it holistically. Extremely small portion of what's required to determine whether or not a system is secure in a particular use context.
Auditable items is an affirmative requirement, so the destruction of them is against the concept of the risk management framework. A risk management framework analysis wasn’t done after Georgia 2020 election.
There was a total breach. Election wasn’t conducted according to the law. No signature verification - 160k votes in the system that weren’t supposed to be there. No cure possible. The election was not valid by cybersecurity standards. He said this is my area of expertise. Scanning at night in Fulton County - an operational security breach that inserted an unknown number of invalid ballots into the system against the rules of conduct of the election.

In the disbarment trial of Trump's former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark, VoterGA's Garland Favorito, the DC Bar's attorney Hamilton Fox is asking Favorito if he has evidence of actual fraud, not just the opportunity for fraud. He requested ballot images. Found many of them had been destroyed against state law. Fulton County ballot images were digitally altered before certification. That is actual fraud that has not been investigated to this day. Another example of actual fraud is mail-in ballots - not on correct paper stock, marked with toner not pens, sworn affidavits of senior workers revealed this. He said this was "clear evidence of fraud."

Kari Lake's new book went on sale today and it is full of fascinating insights and shocking stories. You won't be able to put it down. She's an excellent writer and it's obvious it wasn't ghostwritten, with her clever hilarious style. I highly recommend it. Here are some of the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… My colleague @ConradsonJordan provides more dish from the book here - "President Trump was the 'archetype' of Lake’s strategy on the campaign trail and her vision for Arizona. Trump was Kari Lake’s blueprint to Make Arizona Great Again while sparring with the media propagandists… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

Utterly devastating testimony in Kari Lake's trial today by Maricopa County Level 1 signature reviewer Andy Meyers. He said the Level 2 reviewers wouldn't even bother reviewing the signatures when they got too busy. He also said there weren't enough Level 2 reviewers. He said only about 1/10 of the signatures that should have been rejected were. There should have been 12,000 rejected out of 60,000 a day, but only 800-1,000 were.

Attorney Alexis Danneman, who works for leftist Perkins Coie, is arguing against Abe Hamadeh at his election contest hearing that the statutes don't allow for his efforts challenging the election. Bwahahahaha you can't make this stuff up. She's now saying if Abe Hamadeh is allowed to inspect the ballots, then he says it would "probably change the results" which is "speculative." Bwahahahah he's not saying it would probably change the results, that's a lie; he's CERTAIN it will change the results.

I have a bombshell article coming out at The Arizona Sun Times tomorrow regarding last year's bogus election in Arizona. My mind is still reeling from what I just found out. This is one of those legendary things we'll be citing for years. Won't be easy for the left to refute. I will say this, based on what I know about election fraud at this point, the only way these gutless wonders we have for judges (and I say this with my dad as a retired judge) are ever going to say there’s evidence is if multiple operatives admit they were paid to fix elections.

And here's my write-up about the explosive testimony Thursday to the Arizona Legislature alleging racketeering involving a cartel, Arizona officials, judges, election fraud and hacking Maricopa County databases. Guess what? I'd heard about this for years. arizonasuntimes.com/2023/02/25/exp… Many of the Maricopa County Supervisors over the years have been in the real estate business, particularly developers and homebuilders. When I was at MCAO, we tried to prosecute one of them - phoenixnewtimes.com/news/before-do… But the system was so corrupt he destroyed us instead.....