Covid-19 mRNA vaccines are “vaccines.” Like it or not, mRNA vaccines are no less a vaccine than other vaccines. For everyone sending me friendly messages such as “STOP CALLING THEM A F--ING VACCINE,” I have bad news: Covid-19 vaccines are “vaccines.” aaronsiri.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccine…
Let me suggest reading the Substack article first before commenting. The entire point of publishing this article was to address many of these comments all at once. Thanks!
CAUTION: this tweet requires reading the article attached to it.
1/5 Pfizer's Prevnar-13 vaccine licensed based on clinical trial comparing it to Pfizer's Prevnar-7 vaccine.
And Prevnar-7 was licensed based on clinical trial comparing it to another experimental vaccine. (I can't make this stuff up, see sources below.)
2/5 Prevnar-13 trial found:
"Serious adverse events reported following vaccination in infants and toddlers occurred in 8.2% among Prevnar 13 recipients and 7.2% among Prevnar 7 recipients."
Meaning, equally safe by FDA standards. But equally unsafe by any other standard.
3/5 "Serious adverse event" means something very serious like death, life threatening, hospitalization, disability, birth defect, or medical or surgical intervention to prevent permanent harm. fda.gov/safety/reporti…
1/5 If you think it’s an outrage Congress gave pharma financial immunity for harms from C19 vaccines, you should be absolutely incensed Congress gave financial immunity for harms from childhood vaccines. Truly, you should be.
2/5 For virtually all consumer products, you can sue for harms. That threat is what drives their safety. But, of ALL products, you can't sue for harms caused by products injected into babies and infants dozens of times?!
3/5 Eliminating the market force that assures safety by neutering product liability and class action attorneys from being able to sue for childhood vaccine injuries is insane. Think about it. It leaves no monied interest pushing back against pharma regarding vaccine safety.
1/4 Responding to 100s of comments about mandates sent to me:
The safety valve for the human errors, mistakes, and conflicts attendant with the development, trial, licensure, and sale of any medical product is the ability to say no without penalty.
2/4 There may not currently be a medical product you are mandated to receive that you do not want, but the day may come when there is a mandated medical product you don't think appropriate for you or your loved one. Then what will you do?
3/4 Power ceded to the government is difficult to recapture. Ceding to the gov't the right to dictate what is injected into your body is a grave error. It creates a ready path to profit for a very powerful industry that already enjoys immunity to financial liability for injury.
1/4. Pfizer's website for its C19 vaccine tells patients to advise their vaccination provider if they have any of the following medical conditions. I wonder how many vaccine providers ever bother asking about these before injecting.
Without ado, in Pfizer's own words:
2/4.
"Tell your vaccination provider about all of your medical conditions, including if you:
- have any allergies
- have had myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) or pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart)
- have a fever
3/4.
- have a bleeding disorder or are on a blood thinner
- are immunocompromised or are on a medicine that affects your immune system
1 - As an example of why gov't should at most recommend medical treatment, but never ever mandate, let's take a closer but quick twitter style look at the claim C19 vaccines do not cause variants.
Here we go:
2.1 - Here is the CDC's first claim about C19-V and variants:
"MYTH: COVID-19 vaccines cause variants. FACT: COVID-19 vaccines do not create or cause variants of the virus that causes COVID-19."
2.2 – Here’s the legal demand, on behalf of @ICANdecide, we sent to CDC regarding this claim and demanding it provide:
“All documents sufficient to support that COVID-19 vaccines do not create or cause variants of the virus that causes COVID-19.”