@MisinformNoMore @WeiZhangAtmos 1/ That's complete nonsense.

Given the constraints of limited fossil fuels, negative carbon feedbacks (which remove CO2 from the air), and logarithmically diminishing warming effect, we might eventually get as much as 1°C of additional warming from CO2. Probably less.
@MisinformNoMore @WeiZhangAtmos 2/ 1°C is the temperature change ("climate change") you get from an elevation change of about 500 feet.
@MisinformNoMore @WeiZhangAtmos 3/ At mid-latitudes, 1°C is about the temperature change you get from a latitude change of just 60 miles.

How different are the flora and fauna 60 miles from where you live?
@MisinformNoMore @WeiZhangAtmos 4/ °C is less than the "hysteresis" (a/k/a "dead zone") in your home thermostat, which is probably 2-3°F. Your home's "constant" indoor temperatures are continually fluctuating that much, and you probably don't even notice it.
@MisinformNoMore @WeiZhangAtmos 5/ In the American Midwest, farmers can fully compensate for 1°C of climate change by adjusting planting dates by about six days.
sealevel.info/des_moines_spr…
sealevel.info/wichita_spring… Image
@MisinformNoMore @WeiZhangAtmos 6/ Growing ranges for most important crops include climate zones with average temperatures that vary by tens of °C. Major crops like corn, wheat, potatoes and soybeans are produced from Mexico to Canada. Compared to that, 1°C is negligible.
@MisinformNoMore @WeiZhangAtmos 7/ What's more, one of the nice things about "global warming" is that it isn't very global. It disproportionately warms frigid winter nights at chilly high latitudes. The tropics are warmed less, which is good, because they're warm enough already.
@MisinformNoMore @WeiZhangAtmos 8/ By objective standards, most of the Earth is much too cold. That's why scientists call the periods of warmest climate Climate Optimums: because they are better than colder periods.

Cold kills far more people than heat does. Here's a paper:
thelancet.com/journals/lance…
@MisinformNoMore @WeiZhangAtmos 9/ Note esp. this figure from the paper:
sealevel.info/Gasparrini2015… Image
@MisinformNoMore @WeiZhangAtmos 10/ Even at low latitudes cold kills more people than heat does. But at high latitudes the disparity is enormous. This is for the UK:
sealevel.info/Gasparrini2022… Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton

✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ncdave4life

May 25
@Badumtish97 ⟦1/7⟧ "In less than a lifetime," eh?

Have you ever wondered why all the harms from climate change are promised for the distant future, but the benefits are measurable, right now?


sealevel.info/Africans_go_ba… Image
@Badumtish97 ⟦2/7⟧ It's because the benefits are real, and the harms are not.

Thousands of rigorous peer-reviewed studies have confirmed the benefits. (You'll find them mostly in the agronomy literature, not the heavily politicized "climate science" literature.)
sealevel.info/negative_socia…
@Badumtish97 ⟦3/7⟧ All major crops have been studied. They ALL benefit from more CO2.

The benefits of CO2 for crops are long-settled science. That's why commercial greenhouses use CO2 generators to drastically raise daytime CO2 levels in greenhouses.
co2science.org/data/plant_gro… Image
Read 7 tweets
May 23
Read 15 tweets
May 22
1/12》Many climate activists just PRETEND to be worried about #ClimateChange. They LIKE being alarmed.

The proof is in their reactions. When a "worse than we thought" story hits the press, they're gleeful. But when you show them good news, they're angry.
sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
2/12》If the good news comes from a conservative source, they disparage it, regardless of the strength of the evidence. If it's from "their side," like this NASA article & video, they pretend it away.
nasa.gov/feature/goddar…

Either way they're angry.
3/12》They LIKE believing their dark delusions, and they actively avoid learning anything that might offer hope. If you try to show them balanced information, or balanced debates between experts on both sides of the issue, they won't even look at it.
sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
Read 12 tweets
May 22
Read 5 tweets
May 20
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(