PHYS003: Fission bomb design & history
In this short thread, we're going to learn about "critical mass", timing circuits and with them, we'll combine what we learn in PHYS001 & PHYS002 to learn how the ultimate weapon was created:
The nuclear bomb!
Let's discuss how it works too!
In the previous instalment, we learnt about conventional bomb design and the importance of casing, timing and symmetry.
As it were, this is even *more* important for nuclear bombs. But keep it in mind as well as the principle of fission as we move forward.
Nuclear fission is a chain reaction, but it exhibits an interesting phenomenon. For each type of reaction (slow, fast neutron etc.),there is a probability of the reaction taking place. We call the total reaction rate area as the "cross-section".
Every atom/reactant pair has one!
Just like decay rate, lifetimes of daughter particles and time to fission, there is no physics model that predicts cross-sections.
They MUST be measured experimentally, across all energies and relative velocities of incoming neutrons.
Apparatus used is out of our current scope.
[Aside: You'll note, there are resonances and different cross-sections depending on whether you want fission or capture. This can be exploited, for example, to filter out neutrons from a neutron source that aren't of a certain energy.]
[Aside: accurate cross-sections are secret.]
Let's look at the fission cross-sections of Plutonium-239 and Uranium-235. We can note some things:
* Uranium "prefers" slow ("thermal") neutrons.
* Plutonium "prefers" neutrons of a certain energy.
* Plutonium has a higher fission probability (cross-section) than Uranium.
These cross-sections are still relatively small compared to the very high probability of a reaction in a chemical explosives.
Neutrons can actually move some distance away from the fissile material without reacting.
Each materials also generate a different average # of neutrons!
When the total number of neutrons escaping our fissile material ("pit") is equal to the fission event neutrons generated inside, we call this a "critical mass".
We are in fact interested more in a super-critical mass because it means generating exponentially more energy!
In summary, each fissile material has a fission cross-section, and if shaped as a sphere, each material under normal atmospheric conditions has a certain critical mass requirement to undergo a sustained chain reaction.
You need ~5 times more Uranium than Plutonium.
Great, so let's just get a critical mass going... oh wait. That's not a very good idea is it?
Of course not, baka! It'll produce a huge amount of radiation or may even explode the moment it gets a neutron event. Not like a nuke but enough to kill, wound and sicken you.
We conclude that it's important to keep the fissile material as a sub-critical mass, until we want to detonate the bomb.
Also, just like the chemical explosive, conservation of momentum will tend to want to blow the critical mass apart -- stopping the reaction.
We need a casing.
The most primitive design takes the above experiment and puts it into a chamber. This is known as a "gun-type" assembly and was dropped on Hiroshima.
It was inefficient, produced lots of fall out, as most of the material didn't undergo fission before it blew through its casing.
A far better design was the very first one detonated: The implosion type design. A sub-critical mass and neutron source (initiator) are surrounded by electronically detonated explosives.
With precise timing, all charges detonate, compression the material into super-critical mass.
The higher compression meant the effective critical mass was lower than required. In fact, Fat Man used 6.4kg, not the 10kg required at normal pressures as a result.
The precision timed deformation and strong casing (bomb weighted 6 tons) itself caused the super-criticality.
The casing/assembly keeps the detonation focused on the fission material, generating a huge shockwave internally, imploding. This creates a critical mass which then more rapidly undergoes fission.
Thus, this nuclear bomb is essentially an amplifier of a chemical explosive!
BOOM!
It is important to note the presence of a Uranium-238 casing around the plutonium. This acts as an "inner-casing", holding the supercritical mass together.
It also provides it with fast neutrons, and reflects the fission generated neutrons back, creating a smaller critical mass!
This is known as a "tamper" and it is very important in nuclear weapon design. This "neutron reflector" demonstrates how efficiency can be increased using static material in a clever manner.
Note also, "merely" a change in geometry caused this massive nuclear explosion to happen.
What happens to the energy produced by the nuke? It depends on the surrounding material.
In air, the energy is absorbed by the atmosphere. This strips them of electrons, creating a plasma. This extremely hot plasma expands, creating a deadly shockwave!
It also produces thermal energy (heat), x-rays (same thing as heat but higher energy/frequency) and residual radiation in the form of short-lived isotopes/fallout.
The latter is either desirable if vou want to render an area uninhabitable or undesirable if you don't.
Distinctive to nukes is the creation of a plasma, which is also centred on a point.
You see, a chemical explosion can never do this, the energy produced can only ionise a small percentage of atoms. Most of what's generated is heat and a shockwave!
[Aside: Plasmas carry charge!]
Another tell, everyone knows hot air rises due to buoyancy... but there's a limit as it will encounter more and more cold and lower pressure air as it does.
Due to the extreme temperatures involved, nuclear bombs will create mushroom clouds that rise rapidly and to a tall height!
They are also far less susceptible to wind, drift and the smoke is generated mostly below the luminous parts, not mostly above as combustion particles.
[As shown above, the cloud isn't just fascinating, we can in fact estimate the yield of a nuclear explosion by its height!]
There is another important distinction due to creation of a plasma: The explosion, depending on its height, through both the action of the shockwave and the plasma, will create a large crater and crack/ pulverise the soil around ground zero.
Site access is a must for assessment!
Depending on the yield and either surface depth or elevation of the nuclear explosion, the soil can also remain hot for a lot longer than a conventional explosion, which only reaches ~3000-4000 deg C in the very initial phase.
Nukes reach tens of millions of degrees with ease.
That's it for PHYS003! Key take aways:
Nuclear bombs do not detonate on their own, require precise timing of explosives.
Critical mass is not an intrinsic figure to a material but a result of environmental conditions and geometry, cross-section.
Next PHYS004: Fusion bombs + more!
Of* a material
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A deeply flawed and demonic chaos parasitic species, created by an enemy of our super-species. Almost eradicated by our ancestors (my species, Cro-Magnons), but we could only seemingly get rid of their males.
The chapter of interest is "White Blood and Red Milk".
This details the ancient confusion of the origin of milk. Most societies assumed that mothers converted their blood into milk. I discussed this in part 3 of the thread "Red vs White" species.
The other chapters are also interesting, e.g. "blood as the source of life", but one thing at a time.
It's important to understand how ancient, medieval and renaissance thinkers understood milk and blood for numerous reasons. This book starts with a quote from the latter era:
"If we would define or describe what Milk is, it seemeth to be nothing but white blood", wrote the English physician and naturalist Thomas Moffett (1553–1604) in his dietetic rules for a healthy body. "If one examines
blood somewhat more closely, one will detect that it is almost nothing but milk [. . .] milk, just slightly coloured", -- Dutch physician Cornelis Bontekoe (1647–1685)
Fine structure constant.
How strange. Accurate to 0.03%. I don't feel confident enough to include this amazing thing in my paper so I'll share it on here. Has anyone encountered this approximation before?
[My head hurts and I want to finish this thing. I'm sorry I tried my best.]
It's bizarre because ln(8R/a) is in the toroid inductance formula. If you identify R/a=1/alpha, then you get something very close to an integer out of the logarithm... What?!
To re-emphasise it's not out of no where. It came from identify the Compton wavelength with R and the classical radius with a. This formula brought out the electron mass to within 3.6% accuracy. The trouble is the R on the outside is different: It has to use a Hopfin fibration and torodial/polodial twists, resulting in Compton wavelength/(4*pi^2).
I can't explain it and my head hurts from all the other stuff which I've worked on (more significant in many ways if I can't close this), so I have to admit defeat and leave this in someone else's hands. Someone smarter than me I hope!
The 8 comes pure from ring geometry.
The "a" is saying physically -- if you had a sphere that contained the charge necessary to produce the field of a electron what radius would it be if it also equalled the energy of the electron.
The R comes from the wavelength we've detected.
The 7? I have no idea. Maybe it's just a coincidence.
Einstein with his ret*rded idea has held back physics for more than a century. Even Robert Millikan, who measured the photoelectric effect's frequency dependence, told him to let go of the idea.
I'm going to explain it, for the first time I've seen explained by others and I spent 3 days making sure no one else has thought of such a simple thing before. I was shocked.
It's not a property of the field, it's a boundary condition on the genesis of an electron-positron pair.
Well, well, @AnthropicAI pulled the rug on all of its users.
It introduced Sonnet 4.5, under the pretense that it was better than Opus 4.1. The benchmarks were all cooked. Opus 4.1 is still superior to Sonnet 4.5.
Yet they used this as an excuse to lower usage limits on Opus!
@AnthropicAI If you subscribe to their non-API plan they're not even transparent about how much usage you're getting.
They got people hooked to this and now they're raising the price by 10x as layoffs continue. This is the expert squeeze happening live.
@AnthropicAI Zero accountability from the so-called government who is meant to regulate this sort of scam.
We will be contacting the @acccgovau, over this rug pull. What a load of sh*t @AnthropicAI. You sell people onto Max x20, you announce an inferior LLM, then reduce their usage by 10x?
There was never a "chosen people" if the context is God.
You're likely thinking of Satan (Yahweh) and the "divine council" where Elohim (plural) got to divide up humanity and Yahweh got assigned the most evil bloodline in the world.
(it's in the Torah lol, several places too)
The funniest thing about arguing with Torah believers is using their own material against them.
The real purity is in the gospel and nothing else but the true words of Jesus Christ our only saviour.
Just wait until you find out what Deutoronomy says Moses's last words were (people were complaining about Yahweh's treatment towards them so he was like, look this was the Elohim assigned to us... don't blame me, then Yahweh killed him. He had just killed his brother)