Leo Donofrio, Esq. Profile picture
May 25 8 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
@KariLake has EXCELLENT grounds for a Rule 59(a) Motion For A New Trial. There are 7 exhibits👇 for this SPACE at 11:15AM ET; 8:15AM PT.


December Motion To Dismiss by Maricopa Defendants Image

Judge Thompson's December 19th Ruling dismissing signature verification. Image

Judge Thompson's May 22d Ruling against @KariLake Image

Maricopa Recorder Richer's Official .gov website as of May 22, 2022 Image

Maricopa Recorder Fontes' .gov website as of April 2020 Image

Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 59(a) Image

Opinion from Arizona Public Integrity v Fontes Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Leo Donofrio, Esq.

Leo Donofrio, Esq. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LCDLAW1

May 26
1/2🚨 WAKE UP TEAM @KariLake LFG!

A closer review of the SCOAZ Remand Opinion makes clear that you missed a huge HINT when they VACATED ¶26-30 in the AppCt Opinion. Neither the SCOAZ Opinion, nor the 5 vacated AppCt paragraphs mention ballot review speed issues. SCOAZ instead... ImageImage
2/3...acknowledged that the original @KariLake complaint said magic words: "In Count three of her
complaint, which alleged a violation of A.R.S. § 16-550(A)..." SCOAZ then turned to "registration record" & whether MC violated 16-550(A) by misapplying sig ver "policy" thereto...
3/3 MC gave sig verify policy in '22 Election Plan re multi-sig history. But MC never published a speed of review policy so there's NO WAY to attack application of "policy" that doesn't exist. SCOAZ wants to review MC application of reg record. @BlehmLawAZ made Rey fumble. USE IT
Read 5 tweets
May 24

Maricopa County APPLIED an Illegal Definition Of "Registration Record" To Their Signature Verification Process...and they knew it 💯.

EXHIBIT #1 to SPACE (later today): Recorder Richer's official page as of MAY 22, 2022
👇🚨 Image
A Voter's registration record contains a registration form or forms if they reregistered, driver's license & other documents related to registration. But the signature "on" the registration record is the sig used to register.
Now compare 16-550 w 16-153: "in" vs "on"👇 Image
EXHIBIT 3: Fontes ALSO published at the official Maricopa Recorder site that an Early Ballot affidavit signature must be compared to THE SIGNATURE on what? Anybody? The "original registration form"👇 Image
Read 5 tweets
May 20
You've heard from the Court, the attorneys, the pundits, and now you're going to hear complete LEGAL CLARITY about the 2d trial in Lake v Hobbs just completed May 17-19. You are going to UNDERSTAND the law, precedents, mistakes and best chances for appeal. twitter.com/i/spaces/1mrxm…

Reyes v. Cuming
191 Ariz. 91 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997)


Declaration of Rey Valenzuela: 5.16.2023

Read 10 tweets
May 19
1/2 @JenWEsq You said Maricopa should "NOT" have used "real-time Provisional Ballot" process in past, but that you saw no evidence they used it in '22 or in Abe & Kari's races. Here's proof MC still uses RTPB since 16-579 was updated...AT THEIR SITE NOW👇
elections.maricopa.gov/voting/just-th… Image
2/2 @JenWEsq We need your integrity and expertise to EXPOSE this illegality in Maricopa Elections. See👇at MC site. On same page it says "tabulators cannot read provisional ballots" but later says "the voter is issued a real time provisional ballot" - which IS tabulated on site. ImageImageImageImage

elections.maricopa.gov/voting/just-th… ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
May 19
That Maricopa etal didn't rest after @KariLake rested May have been a strategic error bc Liddy's exam of Valenzuela opens the door on 2 key points:

1. He testified 25 heads have Level 2 review login credentials. The strongest chance Kari has is by proving...
2/3...that L2 couldn't possibly do legit review of 267k ballots in time allowed. Her witnesses testified there were only 3 L2 heads. High MC officials like Rey may have L2 power but he only did 1600, while the main 3 were doing bulk. Kari is entitled now to log discovery as to...
3/3...EXACTLY how many ballots were sig reviewed in '22 by top level login IDs. It's probably ZERO for most. RICHER & JARRETT have L2 authority but they weren't doing much grunt work.

2. See my previous tweets👇about putting Rey on clock and crossing him on this 1ballot/sec BS.
Read 4 tweets
May 18
So Valenzuela just said he can do accurate signature review in less than a second. Ok, request a real demonstration in Court ON THE CLOCK with a random sample of ballots. Make him prove it @KariLake attorneys 💯🚨
On cross-exam ask Valenzuela if there are log files showing him personally conducting signature review in a second or less. You can't just let him say drop that PREJUDICIAL CRAP without PROOF. They have log records. Did he approve sigs THAT fast this election? DEMAND LOG FILES🚨
THEY MUST CHALLENGE THAT 1sec/ballot Valenzuela super ballot review hype. IT'S MEGA PREJUDICIAL. @KariLake deserves DISCOVERY.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!