CEO of Biocarbon Amalgamate (Founder of subsidiary ®Biocarbanate Amalgamate) Creators of ©Ephemerol; Chair of Scanner Control Group; #VoteHarderAZ2024
9 subscribed
9 subscribed
9 subscribed
2/4...it is absolutely CRUCIAL that Poll Workers properly report - on the PBR - the # of ballots counted by each tabulator as indicated by the "Public Counter Screen" after polls close. But the Precinct Ballot Reports from 14 Vote Centers are COMPLETELY BLANK for BOTH Machines... 
2/2 Richer states clearly that a "poll location" is subject to ARS 16-564(A). That's why he couldn't retrieve ballots from dropboxes until after polls closed. A Vote Center is a "poll location" according to the Maricopa County Recorder. That law was VIOLATED at all 223 locations.
2/3 In our #1 tweet re Door 3 Ballot Interference-we presented 2 other PBR's with blank "SECURITY SEALS" sections-making the total 5 so far. And here are 3 more👇for a total of 8 Vote Centers with signed certifications by the Election Board re the content of the REQUIRED reports: 
2/2 See previous Tweet👇re Altrain Vote Center. @KariLake team - whether intentionally or otherwise - continues to file papers stating only 446 Tabulators were used. FALSE - we have documented that 28 were replaced with new machines:
2/2 Look at the attached Precinct Ballot Report from Church LDS Gilbert Vote Center, where the Poll Worker wrote & certified:
2/2 It doesn't matter how many Door 3 misread ballots there are. Commingling is a bad ruse. There were only 661 Sitebook Check-Ins so there should only be AT MOST 661 ballots tabulated by the units. Yet Tally Tapes, Audit Logs & PBR confirm 688 ballots tabulated. BIG PROBLEM:🚨👇 
2/2 It's MORE than 100 Vote Centers & 536 ballots affected by Dominion machines FAILURE to "record" "all" ballots tabulated on each machine's protective counter, but MC has only given us Audit Logs for 179 Vote Centers NOT the 44 where tabulator results were mysteriously trashed. 
2/4 It goes back to SCOTUS case before the Younger precedent - Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479 (1965). Since Arizona is investigating same issues as GA & DC, there's a REAL threat of more prosecutions for constitutionally protected activities, which Trump has right to pursue.
2/3 POTUS might've said, "Fleeing the Capitol to avoid prosecution could violate 18 USC 1073. Peacefully turn yourselves in." 
2/2 Why does CORCORAN use "Custodian of Records" (also Bobb) re June 22 subpoena to the "Trump Organization" while using "custodian of records" as to her re Office of FPOTUS - while preparing Certification for HER to sign as "Custodian"?
2/4 The May 5 warrant app affidavit👇states that Trump Attorney 1 (Corcoran) "was advised" that only the "STORAGE ROOM" contained documents responsive to the subpoena. The affidavit alleges that such advisement obstructed Corcoran's search. BUT on Aug 30, DOJ altered this fact... 
2/2 If you now go back to the Indictment transcript & tape, it makes PERFECT sense when he says they just brought me this stack papers "This was him. This was Milley." The article👇tells you that's exactly how he used "papers" to push back on his enemies:
2/2 The 2d Circuit stated it perfectly: a former POTUS is entitled to "unrestricted" "unrestrained" "unfettered" access to his Presidential records "completely privately". That means in his home. The PRA grants him this with no restrictions at all for classified docs or storage. 
2/2 PRA §2205(1) "access" to docs "in the custody of" NARA is for employees. In (2) docs are "made available" to Courts POTUS & Congress. Doesn't use "access" or "in custody" of NARA here. Docs are "made available" by who? NARA or former POTUS having lawful possession as per (3). 
Why haven't ANY of Trump's legal or PR team mentioned these laws which completely defeat the Indictment?
