For context here, these defensive lines are littered with AT mines in advance of the dragons teeth with shallow trenches that stop wheeled vehicles. Obstacle belts are not impenetrable defenses nor are they meant to be. They offer staggered obstacles that must be cleared one by ImageImageImage
one. This diagram is a good example that typifies a lot of these lines. Before and after the anti tank (probably should be called anti-vehicle, narrower trenches can be crossed by tanks)ditch will be AT mines covering the width. So your breaching force needs to first clear a hole Image
through the mines. Mind you this is a very narrow hole that all follow on vehicles must follow. And if this is being watched by drones the enemy now knows the only path you can cross & makes that area a priority artillery/mortar/guided munitions target. So you have this narrow
path through which only tracked vehicles that can bridge the first ditch can get across until bridging assets are placed (all while under fire). Now the far side of the anti-tank ditch must be cleared of mines, again, a very narrow lane (which must be done super speedily). Now
tracked & wheeled vehicles can cross (in a super well defined targeting area for the enemy) but the dragons teeth must also be cleared. And owing to the continuous issue with mines, tanks/breaching vehicles can't just full speed ahead & pray their momentum overcomes the dragons
teeth. Some of them will get knocked out in the process, some will face issues displacing dragons teeth/get stuck. Invariably a portion will reach them & breach them, and hope to God the other side is not yet another mine belt. At this point your actual breach force, the tanks,
IFVs, HMMWVs etc etc can push through & begin assaulting the defended trenches (or treelines) and hope they're minimally defended/enough of the assault force survived to get there. But your follow on forces are still having to stream through these narrow channels to slowly get
enough forces through the gap. Hopefully you've made multiple successful beaches so any one effort failing or stalling doesn't ruin your push. All the while you hopefully have reserve engineering forces to widen the breaches: for follow on forces, to evacuate casualties, or in
case an effort fails, that you can safely exit without getting trapped.

Ukraine knows all of this. Ukraine's allies know all of this. Ukraine is getting equipment to help deal with this. But even for highly funded modern militaries who train extensively on just this type of
operation, conducting a breach of extensive prepared defensive obstacles against an enemy you can only do so much to degrade before the push (especially without broadcasting where exactly you're going to attack) is one of the most dangerous offensive actions you can take. My
point with all this is not "Ukraine can't do this". They can. They have proven time & time again they're up to offensive action. My point is, like everything else, these obstacle belts are incredibly dangerous, will eat up a lot of Ukrainian lives & equipment, & it's unwise to
laugh them away like they're not a very deadly impediment to Ukraine expelling the Russian attackers. Even a lackluster defense of prepares obstacles can completely shut it down if things don't go perfectly. You clear a lane two vehicles wide and then two vehicles hit a landmine
your lane is not useless & needs to be cleared of those wrecks, or a new lane made. Russia correctly interprets imagery from thousands of drones along the FLOT and guesses where the breach will be/assigns enough artillery assets there. An overnight heavy rain makes wheeled vics
impossible to use, etc etc etc. But make no mistake, the dozens of videos we've seen of Ukraine training to breach extensive obstacle belts means they sure as fuck aren't laughing off dragons teeth or vehicle ditches. Nor should you.
I do want to reiterate because I think this is missed in a lot of these conversations: the entire time this is happening you are under Fire. Given the flat terrain of Ukraine in most places that likely means every weapon the enemy has is firing at you. This is unbelievably hard.
Tagging an armor officer who would have experience training and executing breaches of prepared defenses. @MarkHertling

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ukraine Memes for NATO Teens

Ukraine Memes for NATO Teens Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LivFaustDieJung

May 12
If you've ever played a certain Falklands War wargame in an academic or other setting, you are probably familiar with the style of wargame where the two sides do not see each other and work in different rooms. A deciding factor I've found, in any wargame setup this way, is not
the tactical choices you make. It's not the broader strategic approach or leadership style you bring to the fight. It's not the randomness of the dice fucking you over/helping you out. It's not the brilliance of your teammates.

You know who wins these wargames? The side with CoC
experience. The side with data management skills.

The side that fills every white board in the room with every piece of data they can get. The side that is tracking not just enemy losses but clearly displaying their remaining strength, force allocations, logistics constraints
Read 12 tweets
May 12
Weather happens. Task saturation happens. Unexpected enemy air defense happens. 10 minutes until they can get to you happens.

The idea we'll always have instant air support is an air force fantasy in any conflict, even COIN. Forces need to be able to kill every threat if & when
friendly air can't arrive. Does that mean every Specialist or Lance Corporal needs to be able to smoke a tank from 2000m? No (ok maybe actually). But it does mean the infantry squad either needs something organic to it or one echelon away that can deal with the sudden appearance
of enemy armor, drones, and to a lesser extent, enemy air. This bizarre assumption we'd never ever get into a war where we don't have air superiority before ground troops ever arrived only works if the US gets to choose every war we're involved in & prep for it. Most of the prep
Read 9 tweets
May 11
Excellent thread and it ties together my recent comments on why I think the decision to send (western- bear in mind hundreds of T-72s were sent before this decision) tanks was best served when it could be a whole of NATO. Approach. January saw a ton of announcements from tank
donors, with very vague timelines. That would gradually reveal itself as training nations began publishing video of Ukraine training on their tanks. And Western partners like Gen Milley commented on them being formed into actual battalions & brigades not just being sent back as
combat replacements. The difference being, combat replacements are inserted into existing units where they need to learn the unit, learn the SOP, and become integrates. Wholesale training of battalions & brigades let's tank crews become familiar with platoon leadership. Platoons
Read 8 tweets
May 11
T-55s, T-62s, older T-72s all deserve mockery that Russia can't field enough modern armor.

All will still kill you. Tank duels are super rare in Ukraine & if you don't have friendly armor or an ATGM all those tanks have to do to survive is stay a few hundred meters past your
RPG/SMAW/CG/LAW etc effective range. And even with those, it usually takes multiple shots to land an effect kill/disable shot. All whilst a 100-125mm cannon and multiple machine guns are aimed at you.

Please do mock Russia for using ancient tanks. But recognize the troops facing
it don't really care if it's T-54 circa 1961 or a T-90M if they can't hurt it & it sits far enough away to dump HE and machine gun fire on them.

A fucking Sherman tank at 1000m away is going to be hell for modern infantry with nothing but handheld AT rockets to defend themselves
Read 14 tweets
May 6
Realistically Russia will *never* be back to where it was militarily in Jan 2022. They had *50* + years of accumulated military equipment they've burned through in barely a year. You don't rebuild that as a struggling economy. Only the Soviets could.

defenseone.com/threats/2023/0…
Russia has lost, per @oryxspioenkop and @Rebel44CZ documented losses *alone*, over TEN THOUSAND pieces of military equipment. This is like wiping out 3/4 of NATOs available combat power. This equipment was amassed over more than half a century, most of which was pre-1991. There Image
is no conceivable point where Russian industry can replace these losses, nor even the ABILITY to (much less the money) anytime in the next 25 years. Their armor industry is so handicapped they're restoring T-62s instead of building new T-90s in any appreciable numbers. They still
Read 9 tweets
May 5
Hand in hand with my comments about the west needing to adopt sUAS as attritable strike platforms, I think the various articles & think tank pieces on the role of drones as strike platforms in Ukraine is missing the forest for the trees. The articles focus on how novel it is,
almost treating it like "wow the future is crazy" and "what an interesting sideshow" instead of the reality that the war in Ukraine is undeniably altered at a strategic level because of COTS & craft built small UAS that are providing tactical impact that adds up to strategic
change. Taken as individual events each successful strike is a vehicle destroyed or damaged, a couple of guys wounded or killed. And if you look it solely that way, it's hard to see the bigger picture. But in Ukraine, *daily* & increasingly so as the conflict drags on, at least a
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(