Let me break it down what's going on with this spam. 1./
2/ Reply spammers fight a cat & mouse games with platforms like #Twitter.
One way they get spotted is by the platforms examining links.
If spammers hammer a platform by sending the same link in a thousands replies to the same scam site, it's not hard to spot & scale blocking.
3/ Remember spam emails w/misspellings, weird names, blocks of garbage text, mixtures of words & numbers etc?
These were all tactics to avoid spam filtering done by looking at each of these things for patterns.
Each new filtering strategy = new workarounds.
4/ These incessant Twitter replies are doing the equivalent of old school email scammers.
They want targets to get curious & greedy like "oh cool look here's a website with an account that already has a balance...let me just log in & get rich!"
Who falls for this? Well...
5/ People greedily typing in the site URL & "logging in" see a big account balance!
1.5 million dollars in USDT
They are instantly rich!
But to get it out? Well looks like you'll need to talk to the scammers.
& maybe sign up for the "VIP plan"
6/ Here's the thing. Platforms don't just look at the text & links of posts for evidence of spamming.
(Reports help too)
They scrutinize things like IP addresses & tech used for account creation & posting.
Enough signals of badness & you can scale up blocking.
7/ Speculation: anti-bot filtering that should happen before anyone can create an account or post... is failing.
So spam accounts are posting like crazy.
Then avoiding #Twitter's secondary defenses (e.g. text & URL filters) by mucking up their URLs to be less blatant.
8./ Reply spam is a numbers game.
Hope some users see a reply. (e.g. 14 views on a 60k tweet ain't great but...)
Eventually you get one user ready to go the whole way & get conned.
Even if 99.99999999% of us don't, there's still potential for ROI.
9/ Now, here's the thing. You have seen this reply spam for a while because the network has been up before.
A "damaging" leak of tools from a five eyes exploit developer?
Concerning. We need to know what's under this rug.
Big picture: "trusted, vetted" private sector players offensive cyber are not immune to losing control of tooling... with national security consequences 1/
2/ If true, a tooling leak at boutique firm Trenchant wouldn't be the first time that exploits from commercial offensive vendors wind up... in the wrong place.
Many questions.
In the meantime. Remember when Russian APT29..was caught with exploits first used by NSO & Intellexa?
3/ There will always be a push for states to turn towards the private sector to meet offensive needs.
It's appealing. For some, it's very lucrative.
But in practice it brings unavoidable counterintelligence & national security downside risk that shouldn't be downplayed.
NOW: US court permanently bans Pegasus spyware maker from hacking WhatsApp.
NSO Group can't help their customers hack @WhatsApp, etc ether. Must delete exploits...
Bad news for NSO. Huge competitive disadvantage for the notorious company.
Big additional win for WhatsApp 1 /
2/ Although the massive punitive damages jury award against NSO Group ($167m) got reduced by the court, as is expected in cases where it is so large (to 9x compensatory damages)...
This is likely cold comfort to NSO since I think the injunction is going to have a huge impact on the value of NSO's spyware product.
Comes as NSO Group has been making noises about getting acquired by a US investor & some unnamed backers...
3/ NSO also emerges from the @WhatsApp v NSO case with just an absolute TON of their business splashed all over the court records..
NEW: fresh trouble for mercenary spyware companies like NSO Group.
@Apple launching substantial bounties on the zero-click exploits that feed the supply chain behind products like Pegasus & Paragon's Graphite.
With bonuses, exploit developers can hit $5 million payouts. 1/
2/ Apple is introducing Target Flags which speeds the process of getting exploits found & submitters rewarded.
This faster tempo is also a strike against the mercenary spyware ecosystem.
And the expanded categories also hit more widely against commercial surveillance vendors.
3/ If I contemplating investing in spyware companies I'd want to carefully evaluate whether their exploit pipeline can match what @apple just threw down.