Amid optimism about the forthcoming offensive and the future UKR joining NATO, the West is losing in UKR and on the world stage.
Weapons win wars. Putin’s weapons are bombs delivered to UKR from distant sanctuary airports and launch sites, mass cannon fodder, and a primitive but enduring economy.
China is helping Putin economically and diplomatically to humiliate the US and NATO, making self-isolated from West Russia a cheap game full of resources.
Putin’s strategy is a war of attrition and an incremental slicing of UKR territory.
NATO's strategy is to stay as long as it takes in the hope of negotiated settlement.
A negotiated settlement is, by definition, something less than the already existent negotiated settlement of UKR – Russia border defined in 2003 treaty signed by Putin.
Restoration of this border is the definition of the defeat of the invasion and the fair settlement ending the war under international norms established and supported by the US and the West.
The US and NATO weapons are superior and could do the job, but they are not given to UKR in quantity and especially the quality required to defeat Russia's invasion.
The only reason why a stronger West yield to a weaker Russia is its bow to Putin’s nuclear blackmail, which, if successful in UKR, would be repeated by any nuclear-armed adversary anywhere.
As UKR will lose chunks of territory, the West will lose credibility and global influence favoring Russia, China, and undemocratic forces.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A choir of voices calls for a “realistic” settlement in Ukraine, with Russia gaining at least Crimea. One can only imagine what will happen after that in the long run. Thread.
2084.
Xi IV to Putin IV: I decided to grant Russia the privileged status of province in my Heavenly Communist Kingdom.
I appoint you the governor of the new province —two reasons for this promotion.
Putin again threatened the West with nuclear weapons. The Biden Administration refuses to send long-range missiles and F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine.
Both news broke out almost simultaneously. Coincidence? Causation. Thread of 8.
Putin, like I, was a part of the Soviet foreign policy bureaucracy - the KGB (Foreign ministry). He knows that after the Cuban missile crisis, the Kremlin dropped the illusory doctrine of winning a nuclear war.
He inherited the reality of mutually assured destruction in case of nuclear conflict. It has not changed. So, unleashing a nuclear war is suicidal.
But threatening it is not.
Two opposing justifications are implied for not defeating Russia in Ukraine. It is too strong, a superpower that will use nuclear weapons. It is too weak, an almost failed state that will fall into chaos. Thread.
The imminence of both hazards is exaggerated. Their realistic appraisal leads to an opposite conclusion. Russia can and should be defeated in UKR.
Putin and his clique, like their Soviet predecessors, are aware that nuclear war cannot be won and must not be fought.
Tanks, no tanks. Tanks and now. But the real problem is that NATO has a self-defeating strategy. Thread of 8.
NATO vows to “stay with Ukraine for as long as it takes.” To accomplish what exactly? It’s for Kyiv to decide.
But that is a self-deceptive if not perfidious answer since the West decides against supplying weapons that Kyiv decides it needs to defeat Russian aggression.
For Ukraine "No negotiations with Putin" is detached from reality as "Start negotiations now."
Ukraine's unambiguous heroic stance in response to Putin’s aggression is in the heart of the strong American and international support. This stance should continue to be realistic to maintain support and combat “Ukraine fatigue.”
Let's face it. Unfortunately, Putin's regime might be in the Kremlin for a long time even after a defeat in the UKR. But in any case, only after the defeat the Kremlin will negotiate for real.
Yes. Putin’s words should be taken seriously despite the threats to the West are empty. He is losing, and should be met with more weapons to UKR and sanctions on Russia.
On the pictures he is drinking Voss and wearing the Loro Piana, the brands from the NATO member states.
His threats are not empty only for Russians who are to supply more cannon fodder. But the initial reaction of over booked flights and trains from Russia is telling. It will fail as the small victorious war in Ukraine has done.