1/ The events of the past days illustrate that the West is committed to a #WesternBalkans policy centered on @avucic, with willful blindness towards his depredations against independent media, justice, and public/civic life and his irridentist designs on neighbors.
3/ Events in Kosovo and Serbia this Friday-Saturday – and the US and EU reaction – demonstrated just how low that policy has brought the West’s vaunted commitment to democratic values and rule of law. Statements of principal officials, including the US Secretary of State…
4/ …and prominent US senators, underscore the deviation from the Biden administration’s proclaimed “democracy vs. autocracy” framing.
5/ One 48-hour period illustrated this with a stark split-screen. In northern Kosovo, the Kurti government’s decision to secure access to municipal buildings for newly-elected mayors with the help of police triggered roadblocks and protests that turned violent.
6/ First the US Ambassador decried the Kosovo government’s actions. Then @SecBlinken followed suit. The Quint followed the US in condemning Prishtina’s move.
7/ The strong wording towards Prishtina was not remotely matched by the expression of “concern” about Serbia’s raising the level of readiness of its Armed Forces at the border with Kosovo. It stands in strong contrast to the very weak language used by the West in response...
8/ …to Belgrade’s political moves that led to the current situation in the north – Serbs resigning from Kosovo institutions and the Serb boycott of the 4/23 local elections. (In some cases, no response was forthcoming at all.)
9/ Meanwhile, in Belgrade, Vučić ensured that thousands – including many compelled public employees as well as people from BiH, Kosovo and even North Macedonia – were bussed to a highly choreographed rally, reminiscent of the playbook used 30+ years ago.
10/ He needed the crowd to be there when he would announce plans for a new party movement, called for unity, and criticized the popular protests sparked by his and @anabrnabic’s (lack of) response to mass shootings earlier this month.
11/ The rally summoned @MiloradDodik (fresh from Moscow), Ivica Dačić (same), Hungarian Foreign Minister Szijjarto – a veritable illiberal pantheon – as speakers.
12/ Yet US Senator Chris Murphy – even after a devastating article by the @nytimes outlining in literally gory detail Vučić’s ultranationalist pedigree and criminal links – still referred to Vučić as “my friend.”
13/ Far from supporting and promoting liberal values in the Balkans, what matters seems to be to #pacify the region while pretending it’s a democratic success, through deals with those pursuing hegemonic designs and appetites. This is bad for the Western Balkans, and for...
14/ ...democracy supporters globally. The evident “theory of change” of US Balkan policy, as also underscored by the senators’ stops in North Macedonia, Albania, and Kosovo, is to bury disputes (by pressuring weaker parties to accept terms from predatory neighbors SRB and HR)
15/ ...with the goal of “accelerating” EU enlargement. The problem w/ this approach – aside from its tone deafness to intra-EU realities – is that it empowers those who least share democratic values while pressuring those championing individual rights and other liberal values...
16/ ...even to the point of framing THEM as the real problem. The perversity of such a policy: it paints those who espouse the broad human dignity values the West proclaims in the context of the war in Ukraine as irritants, if not outright obstacles, to process (and “progress”).
17/ To underscore the hypocrisy, many more demonstrators flooded into Belgrade on a rainy Saturday to protest against the Vucic regime, its unaccountability, and for justice. On these demonstrations, the West has been utterly silent.
18/ In sum, the events of Friday/Saturday encapsulate a US/EU policy that has long since lost its way and needs urgent review and overhaul, based on first principles. Given the postures in Western capitals, it would appear that only...
19/ ...legislative scrutiny and media attention can generate the political cost for executives that is necessary to achieve this goal.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ In advance of tomorrow’s Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on US policy toward the Western Balkans, DPC would like to outline the main questions we hope will be asked and answered.
2/ First, how can the US government defend its Serbia and Vučić-centric policy in light of the devastating reporting by the NY Times that detailed the criminal, violent, and anti-democratic links that permeate Serbian domestic politics and society...
3/ ...and which also frame Serbia’s approach to the rest of the region? This is most clearly manifest in the quasi-official Srpski Svet ideology, which threatens to destabilize Serbia’s neighbors.
1/ The Federation of BiH (FBiH) House of Representatives voted a new government into office yesterday, following a set of impositions by @OHR_BiH High Representative Schmidt on Thursday designed to enable them to do so.
2/ The ugly scenes in & outside parliament, and the means (money, threats, ministerial posts) by which both parliamentary groups, the (now) ruling coalition and the opposition,…
3/ …over the last months have tried to assemble/prevent a parliamentary majority are a vivid demonstration of the dirty political business Schmidt and his Western backers allowed themselves to be drawn into.
1/ Yesterday’s imposition by the High Representative @OHR_BiH of a decision supposed to “unblock” the formation of a government in the Federation of #Bosnia and Herzegovina was the result of a badly executed imposition on October 2, as polls were closing, which was likewise…
2/ …supposed to “unblock” government formation. It has nothing to do with peace implementation – the High Rep’s mandate. It is a doubling-down on a failed policy pursued by the US and the EU to contain the problem and empower local oligarchs as guarantors of “stability.”
3/ The EU opposes such impositions on principle but will be relieved by the result, as short-lived as it will no doubt be. Instead of asking themselves why their Balkan policy keeps making matters worse, the US and the EU are digging in.
1/ As EUSR @MiroslavLajcak is visiting Berlin tomorrow to drum up support for the Ohrid agreement, here is a look at what was actually agreed:
2/ When @JosepBorrellF took the stage late Saturday (March 18) in Ohrid to declare “we have a deal” on the EU Kosovo-Serbia agreement, he left observers puzzled what had actually been agreed on in substance,…
3/ …even after the implementation annex was subsequently released.
1/ In advance of the US-convened 2nd Summit for Democracy, DPC’s latest policy paper,
“Gaslighting Democracy in the Western Balkans: Why Jettisoning Democratic Values is Bad for the Region and the Liberal World,” is now online democratizationpolicy.org/gaslighting-de…
2/ While Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has prompted the West to rally to the cause of defending democracy and freedom against hostile authoritarian powers, the defense of these democratic values has been substantially sidelined in the WB6.
3/ The paper assesses the damage wrought by an increasingly transactional and values-free Western policy, both to the region and US and EU credibility.
1/ There is agreement on a state-level government in Bosnia and Herzegovina – but don’t pop the champagne yet. The deal at state level is cynical transactionalism at its best; Federation governance remains precarious. Re-cap:
2/ The main ostensible rationale for @OHR_BiH’s election night imposition of changes to the election law and FBiH constitution was to eliminate the ability of parties – read the HDZ BiH – to block govt formation via the Croat caucus in the House of Peoples.
3/ Rather than eliminating this capability, the change aimed to reduce the HDZ’s motive to do so by giving it leverage to impede other parties in the FBiH HoP from nominating executives – President/VP – by raising the threshold from about 1/3 to nearly half of delegates (11/23).