There are at least 5 things Congress calls “spending.”
1. Budgets from budget committee.
2. Authorizations to spend money from various committees.
3. Appropriations from approps committee.
4. Entitlements/nondiscretionary spending by law.
5. Debt limit.
BUDGET
It’s an aspirational guideline that typically covers 10 years. It’s reported from the House Budget committee. Years 2 thru 10 are routinely ignored. It considers discretionary and non-discretionary spending. Ironically it’s not very relevant to Congressional spending.
AUTHORIZATIONS
An example would be the Science committee authorizes $5 billion per year for 6 years to be spent at NASA. This makes it legal for Congress to spend UP TO that amount of money.
Surprisingly many government departments are not authorized, and operate on waivers.
APPROPRIATIONS
This is where most of the action is.
Don’t like something? Don’t fund it! Congress is supposed to pass 12 separate approps bills, but most often devolves into passing an omnibus or CR. These bills are due Oct 1, and if not passed, the government shuts down.
NON-DISCRETIONARY
These are government programs like Social Security and Medicare that are not affected by annual appropriations bills. They do not stop during a government shut down. Historically, they constitute about 3/4 of government spending, and they are rarely modified.
DEBT LIMIT
When the prior statutory debt limit is reached, Congress, in order to keep spending money it doesn’t have, typically authorizes debt to be incurred for which Americans will be liable. The debt limit can be raised a certain amount or suspended for a certain time.
If you have followed my thread to this point, you now understand more about the ways in which Congress spends money than I did when I first got elected.
Unfortunately the mainstream media and my colleagues frequently conflate these different methods Congress uses to spend money.
In order to simplify, I’ve left out some details of Congressional process, and in doing so have opened myself up to valid critiques of my technical correctness, but I hope at this point to have established a framework for now conveying my message:
Conditioning an increase in the debt limit upon opaquely negotiated concessions from the President is one way to get things done.
But we can and should control spending more transparently and precisely using powerful Congressional tools such as the upcoming appropriations bills.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
.@SpeakerJohnson is making false claims about my discharge petition that seeks to force a House vote on full release of the Epstein files. Let's set the record straight with this thread...🧵
Claim: “The Massie and the Khanna discharge petition does not have adequate protections [for victims].”
Verdict: FALSE - Section 1(A) of Permitted Withholdings provides explicit protections for victims.
Claim: “In the way it was drafted, they cite they don’t want [CSAM] uncovered, but they cite the wrong provision of the federal code…”
Verdict: FALSE - the bill correctly identifies the primary, controlling federal statutes governing CSAM (18 USC § 2256, 18 USC § 2252-2252(A)).
$300 mil Syria & Iraq military
$118 mil overseas disasters
$15 mil AIDS in Africa
$500 mil Israel
$350 mil Kuwait
$1.27 bil foreign security
$500 mil Taiwan
$500 mil Jordan
$267 mil reimburse countries
🧵
This isn’t 🇺🇸 first. I voted against this, because it won’t Make America Great Again; it will bankrupt us.
🧵
Thank you @RepMTG and @RepTimBurchett for also voting against this misappropriation of military funds.
First graph shows the deficit impact of BBB passing vs a baseline of doing nothing. The BBB adds $500 billion to the deficit each year for the next three years and never lowers the deficit, compared to letting 2017 TCJA (tax cuts) expire.
Second graph: “But wait, we will get some additional tax revenue due to a booming economy that booms every year for ten years! Include that in the graph.”
Ok, this one just adds $400 billion to the deficit every year for the next three years. Two elections from now, it looks OK!
Third graph: “Wait, we should have known 2017 tax cuts would be made permanent in 2025, so don’t count their cost! Um, but do count tips, overtime, and seniors tax cuts toward deficit and say they expire in 3 years!”
This gimmickry still adds billions to deficit for next 3 yrs.
🧵Key Takeaways: The January 6 pipe bombs played a role in diverting resources and facilitating the breach of the Capitol.
🧵Our report details, “[d]espite the threat the pipe bombs posed to Congress and the public…federal law enforcement has refused to provide substantive updates to Congress about the status of the investigation.”
🧵 Last night Trump endorsed the idea of eliminating the Department of Education!
On February 7th, 2017, the US Senate confirmed Betsy DeVos as Trump’s Secretary of Education.
Purposefully, on that same day, I introduced HR 899, a bill to terminate the Department of Education.
🧵 I remember meeting Betsy DeVos for the first time at the White House Christmas party and that uncomfortable moment when I told her I was trying to eliminate her department.
To my surprise she quietly agreed.
She said publicly this week she would eliminate the department!
🧵 I have reintroduced this bill each Congress, and I have taken care that it is always designated as HR 899.
Many people like that my bill is only one sentence long. No beating around the bush.