Commodities MacGruber Profile picture
May 30 15 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
This was excellent, and I wanted to delay posting prior to getting a chance to digest.

$BTU now has a MC of $2.7B and share price has steadily fallen since the 'Shareholder Returns' announcement.

With $1.3B of cash and Q2 likely to meet/exceed Q1 FCF - AND - 90%+ production
Sold out for '23, I want to remind that BTU is not a proxy for a play on Coal Indexes.

The opaque nature of their sales, has pointed to multi-year agreements, which underperform indexes in 'up' markets - and might overperform indexes in 'down' markets.

The Mkt is now pricing
BTU at 2021 levels when Indexes were lower, the Company was burdened with high debt loads, they had little cash, and 'future' liabilities would be dealt with FAR into the future - assuming they would be dealt with at all.

That said, I think we are massively oversold here and I'm
now nibbling around the edges again.

Also, I believe that the Company is in active Share buyback mode based on very overwrought language w/IR.

I assume they will announce the extent of buybacks timed with Q2 earnings late July.

$159M of buybacks are like $250M of buybacks in
Q4 and Q1 share price. This should not be overlooked and will be an interesting metric to track.

The longer shares can be bought back under $20, the better for the LT health of the Co - and the share price.

Some Random Thoughts:
- I HATE the Shareholder Returns program and the
Prepaid ARO liabilities. This is BAD Capital Allocation.

#1 - A 30c Dividend is pointless and I'd rather see no dividend paid until the share price has a floor in the high 20's.

#2 - 65% of 'Adjusted' FCF are going to Buybacks. I'd like to see an adjustment to remove adjusted
From this measure. 60% of all FCF would be fine.

#3 - Recognizing the shareholder disgust at this price action, I'd like to see a 'new' $50M-$100M of cash utilized for immediate buybacks - as 'they realize that the extraordinary opportunity by the selloff' in the stock.
#4 - This Company LOVES sitting on cash. Q2 earnings are already 'baked'.

I'd like them to start deploying buyback Capital in advance of 'earnings' when earnings are known and the price is depressed.

I'd like to see urgency to hoover up as many shares under $20 as possible.
#5 - The Old Surety deal was backed by an untapped $300M LOC and liens on equipment.

The New Surety deal (so we are told), required $700M of liquidity on hand plus a prepay of all ARO obligations?

I don't buy this at all. This is the worst deal in History - and yet, will help
The Company IF they're aggressive with buybacks now.

#6 - Being debt free sounds great. But in my (tremdously spot on) Aug '22 Debt Threads, I suggested the Company take $500M of '28 or '29 Term Debt.

With ARO being pre-funded (big CF boost) and Retirement obligations also
Pre-funded, then the lack of 'proper' debt for the Company is...STOOOOOOPID

I'd take take $500M and earmark half for Buybacks and the other half for the North Goonyella re-start.

The excess cash yielded from Buybacks would pay for themselves during this period.

Final Thought
The Company is now actively shorted on downwards momentum and is likely to bounce soon.

If the Company can simply communicate Buyback actions/intentions - they can also cause a tremendous amount of short covering.

We will see a bounce and many will speculate about a new buyer,
When the actual case is simply a short who ended a great run.

Lastly, sentiment is completely bombed out.

Our top 'proponents' now ACTIVELY denegrate the stock.

If you ever called for BTU to be over $50-$70 on this site and now actively hijack threads about the company, with
Increasingly dire price targets, you not only are an unethical fuck head, but likely deserve a knock on the door from the SEC.

I would bet an appendage, that one of these people - who did the exact thing in Summer '22 - when I was one of 5 people reading his posts - has been
Actively short in large size, after calling for runs to $50 - $70 in early '23.

I would suggest leaving #coaltwitter immediately.

Tweets - even the deleted ones, are permanent.

For now, I'm going to root for big heat and a #hotcoalSummer

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Commodities MacGruber

Commodities MacGruber Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GoForGrubes2

Jun 5
When I read this last week, it immediately clicked, but after a weekend of reflection, I have to state how profound this is.

$BTU is trading at an adjusted '20 Level.

- Tons of cash

- Debt free ('28 Convert is 3.25%)

- Higher Coal Prices

- Tons of 'Pre-Sales' for '23 and '24
- Pre-Funded ARO program

What the market completely discounts is the Value of the Cash, but MORESO the Value of the Assets.

North Goonyella (soon to be restarted) is estimated to have $1B of in-place infrastructure value.

What's the value of ALL plants? Particularly in an
Inflationary environment. $7B-$8B?

Isn't this much of the off-shore driller story?

While we got hit by a 4 Standard Deviation Winter (h/t @Seawolfcap), the Story doesn't end there.

Also, what happens when massive monetary printing begins in '24 and drives inflation higher?
Read 6 tweets
Mar 15
Bought 10K more shares of $BTU, my largest position by far

At ~$23

- $14-$15 of cash at the end of Q1

- NO DEBT

- Greater FCF in '22 than Netflix

- '23 is 90% pre-sold

The best buy on my board
I would also add that for those who can plug their nose and stomach this - that IMO the market has the energy trade completely wrong

This will allow BTU to start buybacks at massively reduced prices. It's absolutely an amazing opportunity if you don't care about the price for
30 days...this is far more accretive than starting buybacks at $30+

I would go straight to market first and I think Elliot will agree.

Big gift IMO
Read 4 tweets
Mar 11
Some random thoughts on the fall of SIVB and what happens next:

Losers - Banks. Estimates are high as 80% recovery for deposit holders, but this will wound smaller banks, who are the lifeblood of lending to their community.

The lack of faith in 'the system' will cause deposit
holders to convert to Treasuries - or - move to larger banks.

JPM, B of A will be obvious winners.

Winners - Treasuries. Rates will go down as long as there is 'fear' in the system and risk of contagion is high.

The treasury rates are much higher than bank rates, which
will twist the knife even more.

As a RE developer, 'finished product' is quoted off the 10-Yr Rate (~3.7%) plus 1.7%.

Yesterday's decline was one of the largest since GFC.

I have a $10.5M loan on a new apartment building, which I can lock a perm rate on in July.

I began
Read 12 tweets
Feb 16
Sold some $BTU $30 Feb-24 puts in the final hour yesterday - a starter position.

I wrote earlier that had the Company simply issued a PR in Mid-December that we'd be debt free by end of Jan, the stock wouldn't have dipped below $30

Being debt free, while great, isn't the end
Game in the slightest...it's merely a cash shuffle

BTU earnings typically take awhile to digest - and I suggested on Tuesday that it may take a week+

The real catalyst - likely in the next 45 days is Surety Resolution and the corresponding Shareholder Retuns.

Selling before
Honestly feels foolish to me...in fact, with the right move, we could see the biggest move in Co History

Also, the obsession with Elliot's next moves is beyond overwrought to me

If they want out on any - or all of their position, those would be the easiest shares to buy back
Read 4 tweets
Aug 7, 2022
As a follow-up to my $BTU debt update, I've now gone further down the rabbit hole

A brief BTU primer:
$2.775B MC
$1B+ Cash
$937M Debt (my calcs)
$270M Hedge Cash returning in 2H
$800M Conservative 2H FCF

- The Provocative Question -

***Where can we be by Year End?***

1/13
For Starters, here's the debt w/restrictions re: buybacks & dividends

2024 - $239M today w/$109M of offers O/S to reduce. Only real restriction is that it must be paid from the Wilpinjong Entity🔑

2025 - $378M - No restrictions

2028 - $320M - No restrictions

2/13 Image
The restrictions on buybacks & dividends appear to be solely linked to the Surety Agreement - which backs it's mining reclamation obligations

The Co has $725M of ARO on it's BS

It also has an untapped $300M LOC which supports the SA along w/2nd liens on equipment, etc

3/13
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(