Daily reminder that the big international student boom at the college level wasn't due to falls in domestic enrollment, or government cutbacks. Rather, it's a bunch of institutions opening branch campuses in the GTA in an empire-building exercise.
There is *no* compelling public policy reason why a college in Sarnia needs to build satellite campuses in Mississauga and Toronto.
Here's the full college enrollment data set, from the Ontario government. Tons of fun stuff in there: data.ontario.ca/dataset/colleg…
RE: Housing. My understanding is that Lambton College (to use them as an example), has a 280 residence spots in Sarnia, and none for their new Mississauga and Toronto campuses.
I'm 99.9% sure that's right, but if it's wrong please let me know.
They'd describe it as "33,000 square feet of classrooms, labs, student areas and administration offices in two buildings."
After the @CHRA_ACHRU event, I've been thinking about things like vacancy taxes, and crackdowns on short-term rentals.
As an immediate, temporary response to the current crisis, I think they make a fair bit of sense.
As a long-term policy, they're likely harmful. A thread:
Right now, we have a whole lot of renters (thanks to slow home building and faster-than-expected population growth), and no inventory. In that circumstance, it's logical to want to make sure we're as efficient as possible with housing. No bedroom should go "unused" in a shortage
But there's two long-term problems with hyper-efficiency and trying to drive down vacancies:
1. Efficiency comes at the cost of resilience. 2. A low vacancy market creates a power imbalance between landlords (high power) and renters (low power).
The City of Ottawa needs to increase homebuilding by 157% to reach their provincial target. Yet they're taking their sweet time at instituting reforms. Makes zero sense.
Though looking at needed housing completion increases, in percentage terms, there are a lot of communities with higher hills to climb than Ottawa.
I should also point out that, if anything, these housing targets are too low, as they don't incorporate recent changes to immigration targets, nor do they consider international student enrollments that were higher than forecast in 2022-23.
Morning reminder:
- Over 70,000 people, on net, move out of the GTA (Defined as City of Toronto, Peel, York, Durham and Halton regions) to other parts of Ontario
- This trend continues to grow
- This phenomenon pre-dates the pandemic by several years.
And who is leaving the GTA? Mostly people in their early 30s and kids under age 5.
Where are they going? Thorold, Brantford, Woodstock, Tillsonburg, as well as bigger centres like London.
The 416 and 905s inability to house their growing populations is causing large strains across rural SW Ontario. Oxford (home to communities like Woodstock, Tillsonburg, and East Zorra) is grappling with land use issues from population growth.
Our discourse has this early 20th century idea of international migration... that a newcomer to Canada shows up to Pier 21 or whatever and boom, and obtains permanent residency as an immigrant.
But that's not really how our system functions.
There are many pathways to gain permanent residency... one is through becoming an international student.
Study for four years in Canada, stay for three years under the Post-Graduation Work Permit Program, then immigrate to Canada.
What we're seeing across Southern Ontario metros is folks moving in from Toronto, causing house prices to rise, and existing residents to move to less expensive locales.
A few examples...
Here's metro Kitchener-Cambridge-Waterloo. Gains about 6,000 people a year, on net, to Toronto. But also loses hundreds to Stratford, London, Brantford, and Woodstock. And nearly *2000* to rural Ontario (shown as "Area outside CMAs).
That exodus is causing a lot of rural sprawl
Here's Hamilton. Same story - a net gain of 10,000 from Toronto, but loses to London and Norfolk. Not surprisingly, big net outmigration to Brantford, St. Catharines-Niagara, and rural Ontario.